Multinational corporations and the foreign corrupt practices act
A legal look at transnational business
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2011v6n1.1759Keywords:
Corporations, multinational, economy, law, marketsAbstract
Multinational Corporations (MNC) play a major role in the world economy and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has had a major impact on how MNC conducts business. The passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by the U.S. government in 1977 was a watershed event in the fight against corruption in the postwar era (Cragg 2002). In the wake of the Watergate investigations, which revealed extensive bribery of foreign officials by American corporations, there was a maelstrom of moral outrage (Brown, 1998). The same sort of moral outrage that was heard in the wake of ENRON and more recently in the Halliburton investigation involving Nigerian contracts. The U.S. government is bringing an increasing number of cases under the banner of the (FCPA), which is intended to curtail bribery committed by both U.S. and foreign corporations. The increase is especially worrisome for companies looking to make international acquisitions, as they face the burden of being saddled with any liabilities under FCPA committed by the company they are buying. It should also concern foreign companies in general, as the U.S. government has shown a willingness to investigate and bring actions against corporations whose presence in the U.S. is limited only to some representation in the capital markets-for instance, a local stock market listing in the form of an American depositary receipt (Friedlander, 2005). The FCPA is just one example of how the U.S. government has sought to regulate the conduct of American MNCs in foreign countries (Borg, 2003). U.S. firms seeking to do business in foreign markets must be familiar with the FCPA. This paper will review the history and parts of the FCPA, its effectiveness, and its current and future impact on American Multinational Corporations.
References
2. Borg, Erin L., 2003. “Sharing the Blame for September Eleventh: The Case for a New Law to Regulate the Activities of American Corporations Abroad” 20 Ariz. J. Int’l & Comp. Law 607, 14-18.
3. Brown, Charles & Zarin, Donald, “Property: Pay Day”, Financial Times Information, July 14, 2003.
4. Brown, Lowell H., 1998. “Parent-Subsidiary Liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act”, 50 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 3-4.
5. Calrlberg, Christopher K., 2003, “A Truly Level Playing Field for International Business: Improving the OEDC Convention on Combating Bribery Using Clear Standards”, 26 B.C. Int’s & Comp. L. Rev. 95.
6. Cantan, Thomas & Joshua, “Bribery Has Long Been Used To Land International Contracts”, The Financial Times Limited, London Edition 1, May 8, 2003.
7. Colton, Natasha, 2001. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, American Criminal Law Review 38”, Georgetown University Law Review, Summer 2001 no. 3 p 891-912.
8. Cragg, W. and Woof, W., 2002. “The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Study of Its Effectiveness”, Business and Society Review 107, 98-100.
9. Department of Justice Website (DOJ), 2004. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Antibribery Provision”, www.usdoj.gov/ criminal/fraud/fcpa/dojdocb.htm.
10. FFHSJ, 1996. “De-Greasing the Wheels of Commerce: U.S. Anti-Bribery Initiatives Signal Stiffening FCPA Enforcement”, www.ffhsj.com/cmemos/0094063.htm.
11. Friedlander, Josh, 2005. “U.S. Acquires Abroad Face more Prosecution; Bump in Cases Under Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Concerns M&A Advisers”. Investment Dealers Digest, June 13, 2005.
12. George, B., Lacey, K., & Birmele, J., 1999. “On the Threshold of the Adoption of Global Antibribery Legislation: A Critical Analysis of Current Domestic and International Efforts Towards the Reduction of Business Corruption”, 32 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 1.
13. Johnson, Sarah, 2011. “Deal-Breaker: Fear of the FCPA”, CFO.com US, February 15, 2011.
14. Kruse, Layne E., 2003. “FCPA Compliance A Challenge For US Oil, Gas Companies”, Oil & Gas Journal 1010, no. 39 (Oct 13, 2003) p. 33-34.
15. Loftus, Kevin, McCallum, Daniel, Ricciardi, Walter & Weiss, Paul, 2009. “FCPA: The Longer Arm of the Law”, Asian Law (July 2009).
16. Low, L. & Atkinson, K., 1997. “Led By The U.S., The World Wages War on Corruption”, Nat’s L.J., March 3, 1997, B9.
17. Maiden, Ben, 2011/ “FCPA Enforcement Faces Attack”, Compliance Reporter, January 17, 2011.
18. Parker, Charles & Williams, Stacy, 2004, “5th Circuit: Some Payments to Overseas Contacts Are Not O-Kay, Copyright 2004 ALM Propertie4s, Inc.”, Texas Lawyer News; Vol. 20; No. 10; p 25.
19. Perkel, Walter, 2003. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act”, American Criminal Law Review 40, no. 2 (Spring 2003) p 683-711.
20. Raphaelson, I., Cohen, A. & Maltby, J., June 2003. “Complying with Sarbanes-Oxley in a Multi-National Business”, NLP IP Company, Inc., a Subsidiary of American Lawyer Media, Inc.
21. Transparency International (TI), 2002, “The Bribe Payers Index 2002”, www.transparency.org/surveys/index. html#bpi.
22. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Montedison,, S.p.A., Civil Action No. 1:96CV02631 (HHG) (D. D.C. Nov. 21, 1996).
23. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Triton Energy Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 1:97CV00401 (RMU) (D.D.C. Feb. 29, 1997).
24. United States of America v. David Kay, (Cr. No. 4-01-914) S.D. Tex, Dec. 12, 2001, 359 F.3d 738.
25. United States v. Lockheed Corporation, Suleiman A. Nassar and Allen R. Love, (Cr. No. 1:94-Cr-22-016) N.D. Ga., Atlanta Division, June 1994.