Diretrizes, normas e padrões editoriais para revisões sistemáticas da literatura em administração
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7682Palavras-chave:
Revisão sistemática, Revisão de literatura, Artigo científico, Publicações, Pesquisa de gestão, Gestão baseada em evidênciasResumo
Dada a falta de diretrizes únicas ou padronizadas para revisões sistemáticas de literatura no campo da administração, este artigo compila informações sobre diretrizes de publicação em revistas indexadas e padrões internacionais a fim de analisá-las e ter uma visão mais ampla das diretrizes ou requisitos que devem ser seguidos para a publicação de Revisões Sistemáticas de Literatura (SLR) no campo da administração. A estratégia metodológica contemplou a busca e seleção de padrões internacionais para Revisões Sistemáticas, a análise das diretrizes das revistas que publicam SLR no campo da gestão encontradas a partir de uma busca sistemática e a comparação dos padrões e das diretrizes das revistas.
Downloads
Referências
AGREE. Instrumento Agree Ii Instrumento Para La Evaluación De Guías De Práctica Clínica. [EN LÍNEA]. 2009. <http://www.guiasalud.es>
ALKHARS, Mohammed; MIAH, Fazlu; QUDRAT-ULLAH, Hassan; KAYAL, Aymen. A Systematic Review Of The Relationship Between Energy Consumption And Economic Growth In Gcc Countries. En: Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 9. 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093845
AMSTAR, Amstar. Assessing The Methodological Quality Of Systematic Reviews. [EN LÍNEA]. 2017. <https://amstar.ca/About_Amstar.php>
BENAINE, Shawn. Performance Gaming: A Systematic Review Of The Literature In Public Administration And Other Disciplines With Directions For Future Research. En: International Journal Of Public Sector Management. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 5., p.497-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0191
BENGTSSON, Maria; RAZA-ULLAH, Tatbeeq. A Systematic Review Of Research On Coopetition: Toward A Multilevel Understanding. En: Industrial Marketing Management. 2016. Vol. 57. p.23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003
BOISSONNEAULT, Michaël; MULDERS, Jaap-Oude; TUREK, Konrad; CARRIERE, Yves. A Systematic Review Of Causes Of Recent Increases In Ages Of Labor Market Exit In Oecd Countries. En: Plos One. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231897
CABELLO, Juan. Plantilla Para Ayudarte A Entender Estudios De Cohortes. [EN LÍNEA]. 2005. <http://www.redcaspe.org/system/tdf/materiales/cohortes11.pdf?file=1>
CARRIZO, Dante; MOLLER, Carlos. Methodological Structures Of Systematic Literature Review In Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study. En: Ingeniare. 2018. Vol. 26. p.45-54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052018000500045
CEBMA, Critical Appraisal Checklist For A Meta-analysis Or Systematic Review. [EN LÍNEA]. 2014. <https://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Critical-Appraisal-Questions-for-a-SR-or-MA.pdf>
CEIPEK, René; HAUTZ, Julia; MAYER, Michael; MATZLER, Kurt. Technological Diversification: A Systematic Review Of Antecedents, Outcomes And Moderating Effects. En: International Journal Of Management Reviews. 2019. Vol. 21. No. 4., p.466-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12205
CHICAÍZA-BECERRA, Liliana; RIAÑO, Martha, ROJAS-BERRIO, Sandra; GARZÓN, Claudia. Revisión Sistemática De La Literatura En Administración. En: Documentos Escuela De Administración Y Contaduría Pública Fcecid. 2017. Vol. 2. p.1-18. http://www.fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/CentroEditorial/documentos/documentosEACP/documentos-EACP-29.pdf
CIAPPONI, Agustín. Quadas-2: Instrumento Para La Evaluación De La Calidad De Estudios De Precisión Diagnóstica. En: Evidencia, Actualización En La Práctica Ambulatoria. 2015. Vol. 18. No. 1. http://www.bris.ac.uk/quadas
COOPER, Harris; HEDGES, Larry. The Handbook Of Research Synthesis And Meta-analysis. Research Synthesis As A Scientific Process. 2 ed. [s.l.]. :Russell Sage Foundation, 2009. 3-17 p.
DE KOCK, François; LIEVENS, Filip; BORN, Marise. The Profile Of The ‘good Judge’ In Hrm: A Systematic Review And Agenda For Future Research. En: Human Resource Management Review. 2020. Vol. 30. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.09.003
ERGUÍA, Raul. ¿Revisión Sistemática, Revisión Narrativa O Metaanálisis?. En: Revista De La Sociedad Española Del Dolor. Madrid: Ediciones Doyma, 2014. Vol. 21. No. 6., p.359-360. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1134-80462014000600010
ELSEVIER DEVELOPERS, Elsevier Developer Portal. [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://dev.elsevier.com/sc_search_tips.html>
EMERALD PUBLISHING, About. [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/about?distinct_id=1720532bdde1cd-01b391d6556c24-d373666-100200-1720532bde02ea&_ga=2.134593841.1534825693.1602561840-1147469355.1589225111>
EVERS, Silvia; GOOSSENS, Mariëlle; DE VET, Henrica; VAN TULDER, Maurits; AMENT, André. Criteria List For Assessment Of Methodological Quality Of Economic Evaluations: Consensus On Health Economic Criteria.. En: International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care. Abril, 2005. Vol. 21. No. 2., p.240-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462305050324
FIGUERÓ, Paola; RAUFFLET, Emmanuel. Sustainability In Higher Education: A Systematic Review With Focus On Management Education. En: Journal Of Cleaner Production. Noviembre, 2015. Vol. 106. p.22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.118
GEYSKENS, Inge; STEENKAMP, Jan-Benedict; KUMAR, Nirmalya. Generalizations About Trust In Marketing Channel Relationships Using Meta-analysis. En: International Journal Of Research In Marketing. 1998. Vol. 15. No. 3., p.223-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00002-0
GISBERT, Javier; BONFILL, X. ¿Cómo Realizar, Evaluar Y Utilizar Revisiones Sistemáticas Y Metaanálisis?. En: Gastroenterología Hepatol. 2004. Vol. 27. No. 3., p.129-149. ISSN 0210-5705
GROOTEN, Wilhelmus Johannes; TSELI, Elena; OLOV, Björn; BOERSMA, Katja; STÅLNACKE, Britt-Marie; GERDLE, Björn; ENTHOVEN, Paul. Elaborating On The Assessment Of The Risk Of Bias In Prognostic Studies In Pain Rehabilitation Using Quips—aspects Of Interrater Agreement. En: Diagnostic And Prognostic Research. 2019. Vol. 3. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0050-0
HALLINGER, Philip; SURIYANKIETKAEW, Suparak. Science Mapping Of The Knowledge Base On Sustainable Leadership, 1990-2018. En: Sustainability (switzerland). 2018. Vol. 10. No. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846
HUTTON, Brian; CATALÁ-LÓPEZ, Ferrán, MOHER, David. La Extensión De La Declaración Prisma Para Revisiones Sistemáticas Que Incorporan Metaanálisis En Red: Prisma-nma. En: Medicina Clinica. 2016. Vol. 147. No. 6., p.262-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025
ISPOR, Ispor - Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (cheers) - Explanation And Elaboration. [EN LÍNEA]. 2013. <https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/good-practices-for-outcomes-research/article/consolidated-health-economic-evaluation-reporting-standards-(cheers)---explanation-and-elaboration>
KETELSEN, Meike; JANSSEN, Meike; HAMM, Ulrich. Consumers’ Response To Environmentally-friendly Food Packaging - A Systematic Review. En: Journal Of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123
KOHTAMÄKI, Marco; RABETINO, Rodrigo; MÖLLER, Kristian. Alliance Capabilities: A Systematic Review And Future Research Directions. En: Industrial Marketing Management. Enero, 2018. Vol. 68. p.188-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.014
LATINDEX, Características De Calidad Del Catálogo 2.0 (metodología). [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://www.latindex.org/latindex/meto2>
MOHER, David; SHAMSEER, Larissa; CLARKE, Mike; GHERSI, Davina; LIBERATI, Alessandro; PETTICREW, Mark; SHEKELLE, Paul; STEWART, Lesley; PRISMA-P GROUP. Prisma Checklist. [EN LÍNEA]. 2009. <http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/Checklist.aspx>
MORAGA, Javier; CARTES-VELÁSQUEZ, Ricardo. Cheklists, Part Ii: Quorum And Prisma. En: Revista Chilena De Cirugia. 2015. Vol. 67. No. 3., p.325-330. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-40262015000300015
MORENO, Begoña; MUÑOZ, Maximiliano; CUELLAR, Javier; DOMANCIC, Stefan; VILLANUEVA, Julio. Revisiones Sistemáticas: Definición Y Nociones Básicas. En: Revista Clínica De Periodoncia, Implantología Y Rehabilitación Oral. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 3., p.184-186. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0719-01072018000300184
NAVARRO, Claudia; RAMÍREZ, María. Mapeo Sistemático De La Literatura Sobre Evaluación Docente (2013-2017) . En: Educação E Pesquisa. São Paulo, 2018. Vol. 44. p.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201844185677
NEUMANN, Ignacio; PANTOJA, Tomás; PEÑALOZA, Blanca; CIFUENTES, Lorena; RADA, Gabriel. El Sistema Grade: Un Cambio En La Forma De Evaluar La Calidad De La Evidencia Y La Fuerza De Recomendaciones. En: Revista Medica De Chile. 2014. Vol. 142. No. 5., p.630-635. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872014000500012
NIHR, Prospero International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews. [EN LÍNEA]. Octubre de 2020]. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#aboutpage
REN, Lily; PAETZOLD, Ramona; COLELLA, Adrienne. A Meta-analysis Of Experimental Studies On The Effects Of Disability On Human Resource Judgments. En: Human Resource Management Review. 2008. Vol. 18. No. 3., p.191-203.
RIBES-GINER, Gabriela; PERELLO-MARÍN, María; PANTOJA-DÍAZ, Odette. Revisión Sistemática De Literatura De Las Variables Clave Del Proceso De Co-creación En Las Instituciones De Educación Superior. En: Tec Empresarial. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 3., p.41-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/te.v11i3.3365
RUDOLPH, Cort; KOOIJ, Dorien; RAUVOLA, Rachel; ZACHER, Hannes. Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-analysis Of Antecedents And Outcomes. En: Journal Of Organizational Behavior. Febrero, 2018. Vol. 39. No. 2., p.229-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2264
SÁNCHEZ-CUADRADO, Sonia; MORATO-LARA, Jorge; PALACIOS-MADRID, Vidente; LLORENS-MORILLO, Juan; MOREIRO-GONZÁLEZ, José-Antonio. De Repente, ¿todos Hablamos De Ontologías? [And suddenly, everybody is talking about ontologies?]. En: El Profesional De La Información. Agosto, 2007. Vol. 16. No. 6., p.562-568. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2007.nov.03
TARRAHI, Farid; EISEND, Martin; DOST, Florian. A Meta-analysis Of Price Change Fairness Perceptions. En: International Journal Of Research In Marketing. 2016. Vol. 33. No. 1., p.199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.10.004
THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE, Checklist For Systematic Reviews And Research Syntheses Critical Appraisal Checklist For Systematic Reviews And Research Syntheses 2. [EN LÍNEA]. 2017. <http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.htmlwww.joannabriggs.org>
UOC, Business Source Complete (ebsco). [EN LÍNEA]. Biblioteca De La Uoc. 2013. <http://biblioteca.uoc.edu/es/recursos/recurso/business-source-complete-ebsco>
UPTC, Bases De Datos Bibliográficas. [EN LÍNEA]. Departamento De Biblioteca Uptc. <http://www.uptc.edu.co/servicios/sistema_bibliotecas/bibliotk_dig/bdat_bbliog/>
VAN IDDEKINGE, Chad; ARNOLD, John; FRIEDER, Rachel; ROTH, Philip. A Meta‐analysis Of The Criterion‐related Validity Of Prehire Work Experience. En: Personnel Psychology. 2019. Vol. 72. No. 4., p.571-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12335
VAN KERKHOVE, Maria; MUMFORD, Elizabeth; MOUNTS, Anthony; BRESEE, Joseph; LY, Sowath; BRIDGES, Carolyn; OTTE, Joachim. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (h5n1): Pathways Of Exposure At The Animal‐human Interface, A Systematic Review. En: Plos One. 2011. Vol. 6. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014582
WEB OF SCIENCE, Web Of Science. [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://www.webofknowledge.com/>
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Entramado
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
