Guidelines, standards and editorial norms of systematic literature reviews in administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7682Keywords:
Systematic literature review, Literature review, Publication, Journal article, Management research, Evidence-based decision-makingAbstract
In management there is a lack of unique or standardized guidelines for systematic reviews of the literature. This article compiles information on the publication guidelines in indexed journals in management and international standards to analyze them. This gives a broader panorama about the guidelines or requirements to be followed for the publication of Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR) in the field of administration. The methodological strategy included the search and selection of international standards for Systematic Reviews, the analysis of the guidelines of the journals that publish SLR in the field of management and administration found from a systematic search and the comparison of the standards and guidelines of the journals.
Downloads
References
AGREE. Instrumento Agree Ii Instrumento Para La Evaluación De Guías De Práctica Clínica. [EN LÍNEA]. 2009. <http://www.guiasalud.es>
ALKHARS, Mohammed; MIAH, Fazlu; QUDRAT-ULLAH, Hassan; KAYAL, Aymen. A Systematic Review Of The Relationship Between Energy Consumption And Economic Growth In Gcc Countries. En: Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 9. 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093845
AMSTAR, Amstar. Assessing The Methodological Quality Of Systematic Reviews. [EN LÍNEA]. 2017. <https://amstar.ca/About_Amstar.php>
BENAINE, Shawn. Performance Gaming: A Systematic Review Of The Literature In Public Administration And Other Disciplines With Directions For Future Research. En: International Journal Of Public Sector Management. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 5., p.497-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0191
BENGTSSON, Maria; RAZA-ULLAH, Tatbeeq. A Systematic Review Of Research On Coopetition: Toward A Multilevel Understanding. En: Industrial Marketing Management. 2016. Vol. 57. p.23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003
BOISSONNEAULT, Michaël; MULDERS, Jaap-Oude; TUREK, Konrad; CARRIERE, Yves. A Systematic Review Of Causes Of Recent Increases In Ages Of Labor Market Exit In Oecd Countries. En: Plos One. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231897
CABELLO, Juan. Plantilla Para Ayudarte A Entender Estudios De Cohortes. [EN LÍNEA]. 2005. <http://www.redcaspe.org/system/tdf/materiales/cohortes11.pdf?file=1>
CARRIZO, Dante; MOLLER, Carlos. Methodological Structures Of Systematic Literature Review In Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study. En: Ingeniare. 2018. Vol. 26. p.45-54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052018000500045
CEBMA, Critical Appraisal Checklist For A Meta-analysis Or Systematic Review. [EN LÍNEA]. 2014. <https://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Critical-Appraisal-Questions-for-a-SR-or-MA.pdf>
CEIPEK, René; HAUTZ, Julia; MAYER, Michael; MATZLER, Kurt. Technological Diversification: A Systematic Review Of Antecedents, Outcomes And Moderating Effects. En: International Journal Of Management Reviews. 2019. Vol. 21. No. 4., p.466-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12205
CHICAÍZA-BECERRA, Liliana; RIAÑO, Martha, ROJAS-BERRIO, Sandra; GARZÓN, Claudia. Revisión Sistemática De La Literatura En Administración. En: Documentos Escuela De Administración Y Contaduría Pública Fcecid. 2017. Vol. 2. p.1-18. http://www.fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/CentroEditorial/documentos/documentosEACP/documentos-EACP-29.pdf
CIAPPONI, Agustín. Quadas-2: Instrumento Para La Evaluación De La Calidad De Estudios De Precisión Diagnóstica. En: Evidencia, Actualización En La Práctica Ambulatoria. 2015. Vol. 18. No. 1. http://www.bris.ac.uk/quadas
COOPER, Harris; HEDGES, Larry. The Handbook Of Research Synthesis And Meta-analysis. Research Synthesis As A Scientific Process. 2 ed. [s.l.]. :Russell Sage Foundation, 2009. 3-17 p.
DE KOCK, François; LIEVENS, Filip; BORN, Marise. The Profile Of The ‘good Judge’ In Hrm: A Systematic Review And Agenda For Future Research. En: Human Resource Management Review. 2020. Vol. 30. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.09.003
ERGUÍA, Raul. ¿Revisión Sistemática, Revisión Narrativa O Metaanálisis?. En: Revista De La Sociedad Española Del Dolor. Madrid: Ediciones Doyma, 2014. Vol. 21. No. 6., p.359-360. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1134-80462014000600010
ELSEVIER DEVELOPERS, Elsevier Developer Portal. [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://dev.elsevier.com/sc_search_tips.html>
EMERALD PUBLISHING, About. [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/about?distinct_id=1720532bdde1cd-01b391d6556c24-d373666-100200-1720532bde02ea&_ga=2.134593841.1534825693.1602561840-1147469355.1589225111>
EVERS, Silvia; GOOSSENS, Mariëlle; DE VET, Henrica; VAN TULDER, Maurits; AMENT, André. Criteria List For Assessment Of Methodological Quality Of Economic Evaluations: Consensus On Health Economic Criteria.. En: International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care. Abril, 2005. Vol. 21. No. 2., p.240-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462305050324
FIGUERÓ, Paola; RAUFFLET, Emmanuel. Sustainability In Higher Education: A Systematic Review With Focus On Management Education. En: Journal Of Cleaner Production. Noviembre, 2015. Vol. 106. p.22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.118
GEYSKENS, Inge; STEENKAMP, Jan-Benedict; KUMAR, Nirmalya. Generalizations About Trust In Marketing Channel Relationships Using Meta-analysis. En: International Journal Of Research In Marketing. 1998. Vol. 15. No. 3., p.223-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00002-0
GISBERT, Javier; BONFILL, X. ¿Cómo Realizar, Evaluar Y Utilizar Revisiones Sistemáticas Y Metaanálisis?. En: Gastroenterología Hepatol. 2004. Vol. 27. No. 3., p.129-149. ISSN 0210-5705
GROOTEN, Wilhelmus Johannes; TSELI, Elena; OLOV, Björn; BOERSMA, Katja; STÅLNACKE, Britt-Marie; GERDLE, Björn; ENTHOVEN, Paul. Elaborating On The Assessment Of The Risk Of Bias In Prognostic Studies In Pain Rehabilitation Using Quips—aspects Of Interrater Agreement. En: Diagnostic And Prognostic Research. 2019. Vol. 3. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0050-0
HALLINGER, Philip; SURIYANKIETKAEW, Suparak. Science Mapping Of The Knowledge Base On Sustainable Leadership, 1990-2018. En: Sustainability (switzerland). 2018. Vol. 10. No. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846
HUTTON, Brian; CATALÁ-LÓPEZ, Ferrán, MOHER, David. La Extensión De La Declaración Prisma Para Revisiones Sistemáticas Que Incorporan Metaanálisis En Red: Prisma-nma. En: Medicina Clinica. 2016. Vol. 147. No. 6., p.262-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025
ISPOR, Ispor - Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (cheers) - Explanation And Elaboration. [EN LÍNEA]. 2013. <https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/good-practices-for-outcomes-research/article/consolidated-health-economic-evaluation-reporting-standards-(cheers)---explanation-and-elaboration>
KETELSEN, Meike; JANSSEN, Meike; HAMM, Ulrich. Consumers’ Response To Environmentally-friendly Food Packaging - A Systematic Review. En: Journal Of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123
KOHTAMÄKI, Marco; RABETINO, Rodrigo; MÖLLER, Kristian. Alliance Capabilities: A Systematic Review And Future Research Directions. En: Industrial Marketing Management. Enero, 2018. Vol. 68. p.188-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.014
LATINDEX, Características De Calidad Del Catálogo 2.0 (metodología). [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://www.latindex.org/latindex/meto2>
MOHER, David; SHAMSEER, Larissa; CLARKE, Mike; GHERSI, Davina; LIBERATI, Alessandro; PETTICREW, Mark; SHEKELLE, Paul; STEWART, Lesley; PRISMA-P GROUP. Prisma Checklist. [EN LÍNEA]. 2009. <http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/Checklist.aspx>
MORAGA, Javier; CARTES-VELÁSQUEZ, Ricardo. Cheklists, Part Ii: Quorum And Prisma. En: Revista Chilena De Cirugia. 2015. Vol. 67. No. 3., p.325-330. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-40262015000300015
MORENO, Begoña; MUÑOZ, Maximiliano; CUELLAR, Javier; DOMANCIC, Stefan; VILLANUEVA, Julio. Revisiones Sistemáticas: Definición Y Nociones Básicas. En: Revista Clínica De Periodoncia, Implantología Y Rehabilitación Oral. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 3., p.184-186. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0719-01072018000300184
NAVARRO, Claudia; RAMÍREZ, María. Mapeo Sistemático De La Literatura Sobre Evaluación Docente (2013-2017) . En: Educação E Pesquisa. São Paulo, 2018. Vol. 44. p.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201844185677
NEUMANN, Ignacio; PANTOJA, Tomás; PEÑALOZA, Blanca; CIFUENTES, Lorena; RADA, Gabriel. El Sistema Grade: Un Cambio En La Forma De Evaluar La Calidad De La Evidencia Y La Fuerza De Recomendaciones. En: Revista Medica De Chile. 2014. Vol. 142. No. 5., p.630-635. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872014000500012
NIHR, Prospero International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews. [EN LÍNEA]. Octubre de 2020]. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#aboutpage
REN, Lily; PAETZOLD, Ramona; COLELLA, Adrienne. A Meta-analysis Of Experimental Studies On The Effects Of Disability On Human Resource Judgments. En: Human Resource Management Review. 2008. Vol. 18. No. 3., p.191-203.
RIBES-GINER, Gabriela; PERELLO-MARÍN, María; PANTOJA-DÍAZ, Odette. Revisión Sistemática De Literatura De Las Variables Clave Del Proceso De Co-creación En Las Instituciones De Educación Superior. En: Tec Empresarial. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 3., p.41-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/te.v11i3.3365
RUDOLPH, Cort; KOOIJ, Dorien; RAUVOLA, Rachel; ZACHER, Hannes. Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-analysis Of Antecedents And Outcomes. En: Journal Of Organizational Behavior. Febrero, 2018. Vol. 39. No. 2., p.229-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2264
SÁNCHEZ-CUADRADO, Sonia; MORATO-LARA, Jorge; PALACIOS-MADRID, Vidente; LLORENS-MORILLO, Juan; MOREIRO-GONZÁLEZ, José-Antonio. De Repente, ¿todos Hablamos De Ontologías? [And suddenly, everybody is talking about ontologies?]. En: El Profesional De La Información. Agosto, 2007. Vol. 16. No. 6., p.562-568. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2007.nov.03
TARRAHI, Farid; EISEND, Martin; DOST, Florian. A Meta-analysis Of Price Change Fairness Perceptions. En: International Journal Of Research In Marketing. 2016. Vol. 33. No. 1., p.199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.10.004
THE JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE, Checklist For Systematic Reviews And Research Syntheses Critical Appraisal Checklist For Systematic Reviews And Research Syntheses 2. [EN LÍNEA]. 2017. <http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.htmlwww.joannabriggs.org>
UOC, Business Source Complete (ebsco). [EN LÍNEA]. Biblioteca De La Uoc. 2013. <http://biblioteca.uoc.edu/es/recursos/recurso/business-source-complete-ebsco>
UPTC, Bases De Datos Bibliográficas. [EN LÍNEA]. Departamento De Biblioteca Uptc. <http://www.uptc.edu.co/servicios/sistema_bibliotecas/bibliotk_dig/bdat_bbliog/>
VAN IDDEKINGE, Chad; ARNOLD, John; FRIEDER, Rachel; ROTH, Philip. A Meta‐analysis Of The Criterion‐related Validity Of Prehire Work Experience. En: Personnel Psychology. 2019. Vol. 72. No. 4., p.571-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12335
VAN KERKHOVE, Maria; MUMFORD, Elizabeth; MOUNTS, Anthony; BRESEE, Joseph; LY, Sowath; BRIDGES, Carolyn; OTTE, Joachim. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (h5n1): Pathways Of Exposure At The Animal‐human Interface, A Systematic Review. En: Plos One. 2011. Vol. 6. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014582
WEB OF SCIENCE, Web Of Science. [EN LÍNEA]. 2020. <https://www.webofknowledge.com/>
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Entramado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
