Analysis of jurisprudence in the frame of special process of restitution and formalization of lands. a view to the context of territorial violence

Authors

  • Rafaela Sayas Contreras
  • Melisa José Caro Benítez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2016v11n1.488

Keywords:

Conflict, Transitional justice, Land, Judges, Restitution, Reparation

Abstract

The rights on the land are a neuralgic point in the history of the country. The economic and social inequalities of the Colombian population are attributed to the struggle for the land. The issuance of the Law 1448 of 2011 involves a political and legal commitment for the construction of the coexistence in Colombia, in which, into a frame of integral repair to the victims of the armed conflict, are laid the foundations for the restitution of despoiled lands, an aspect that implies the joint of institutions, but beyond it, it is a challenge to the judicial branch of the public power. The fundamental point of the restitution of lands relapses into the judge, specifically into the “judge of lands.” This being so, the current article accounts of the judicial practice around the processes of restitution in a regional level, but, at the same time, it reflects about the reconstruction of the territorial armed conflict in the Colombian Caribbean region.

Downloads

References

Congreso de la República de Colombia, Ley 1448 de 2011.

Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sentencia C-1194 de 2008.

Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sentencia C-715 de 2012.

Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sentencia C-099 de 2013.

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (Sentencia de 31 de enero de 2006. Sentencia de 15 de septiembre de 2005). Caso Masacre de Pueblo Bello. Sentencia de 31 de enero de 2006.Caso Masacre de Mapiripán. Sentencia de 15 de septiembre de 2005.

Habermas, J. (1998). Facticidad y validez. Madrid. España: Trotta Editores.

Joinet, L. (1997). Informe final de la cuestión de la impunidad de los autores de violaciones de los derechos humanos (de¬rechos civiles y políticos). New York: Naciones Unidas .

Nash, C. (2005). Seminario Reparación del Daño por violación a los derechos humanos, Universidad Iberoamericana y Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Distrito Federal, Ciudad de México

Ramirez Bastidas, R. (2010). Justicia Transicional. Bogota, Colombia: Editores Leyer.

Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Cartagena, Sala Especializada de Restitución de Tierras, Sentencia. Agosto 1 de 2013, M. S. (Ada Lallemand Abramuck).

Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Cartagena, Sentencia. Mayo 9 de 2013, M. P. Laura Cantillo Araújo.

Velásquez Rivera, E. d. (2007). Historia del paramilitarismo en Colombia. . Scielo brasil História [online]. 2007, vol.26, n.1, ISSN 1980-4369, pp. 134-153. Obtenido de http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742007000100012.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

Issue

Section

Law and Political Science

How to Cite

Sayas Contreras, R., & Caro Benítez, M. J. (2016). Analysis of jurisprudence in the frame of special process of restitution and formalization of lands. a view to the context of territorial violence. Saber, Ciencia Y Libertad, 11(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2016v11n1.488

Similar Articles

1-10 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.