Evaluation of the obstetric risk in prenatal care in a basic level of complexity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2665-427X/ijeph.2.11029

Keywords:

Pregnancy, Delivery obstetric, Prenatal Care, Pregnancy Complications, pregnancy maintenance, pregnancy trimesters, birthing centers

Abstract

Introduction: Prenatal care (PC) is recommended to be carried out in each pregnant woman aimed at identifying any risks that might compromise her health and that of her fetus, to intervene them for a safe and healthy pregnancy.

Objective: To determine if the Obstetric Risk (OR) classification at the Eastern Health Network (ESE O) meets the shock plan criteria defined by the Secretariat of Public Health (SSP) in 2012.

Methods: An analysis of the case histories of 165 pregnant women was carried out. Follow-up of standards and guidelines were considered.

Results: Adherence of general practitioners (GP) and obstetrician-gynaecologists (OG) to the shock plan OR classification was found; the first PC occurred before week 12 in almost 50% of the pregnant women, however, 70% of the institutions attended the first PC in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. No statistical difference in OR classification was found at the first PC, between GP and OG (p-value=0.06). The opportunity for evaluation by the OG was not done as recommended for high or very high-risk pregnant women, 27.8% of pregnant women did not have an appointment with the OG.

Conclusion: No clear decisions were found aimed at reviewing the initial classification of the OR, expected by the 36 weeks of pregnancy by the GO, generating unnecessary referrals to higher levels of care. The new-born weight was not associated to the OR classification. Systematic evaluations of this type are required in all health entities that care for pregnant women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ignacio Alberto Concha-Eastman, Secretaría de Salud Pública de Cali, Cali, Colombia

    Médico Cirujano UV, Magister en Epidemiología UV y Master of Science U. de Londres

  • José Gravin Fernández Quintero, Red de Salud del Oriente E.S.E., Cali, Colombia; Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Colombia

    Enfermero Universidad del Cauca, Especialista en auditoria y garantía de calidad en Salud con énfasis en epidemiologia Universidad EAN, Maestría en epidemiologia Universidad Libre

  • Sandra Elena Pineda Ospina , Red de Salud del Oriente E.S.E., Cali, Colombia

    Enfermera Universidad del Valle, Magíster en Salud Pública Universidad del Valle

  • Edgar Iván Ortiz Lizcano , Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia

    Especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia, Magister en Salud Pública. Profesor Titular Universidad del Valle.

References

1. Minsalud; Colciencias. Guía de Práctica Clínica para la prevención, detección temprana y tratamiento del embarazo, parto o puerperio. Guías No. 11. Ministerio de Salud; 2013. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/INEC/IETS/Gu%C3%ADa.completa.Embarazo.Parto.2013.pdf

2. OPS/OMS. Recomendaciones de la OMS: cuidados durante el parto para una experiencia de parto positiva. Washington, D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/anc-positive-pregnancy-experience-summary/es/

3. Fescina RH, De Mucio B, Martínez G, Durán P, Mainero L, Rubino M. Sistema informático perinatal (SIP): Historia clínica perinatal: instrucciones de llenado y definición de términos. (CLAP/SMR. Publicación científica 1584. 2a ed. Montevideo: CLAP/SMR; 2011.

4. Fescina RH, De Mucio B, Díaz Rossello JL, Martínez G, Serruya S. Salud sexual y reproductiva: guías para el continuo de atención de la mujer y el recién nacido focalizadas en APS: guía para la práctica básica; 2011.

5. Fescina R, De Mucio B, Ortiz E, Jarquin D. Guías para la atención de las principales emergencias obstétricas. Montevideo: CLAP/SMR. CLAP/SMR. Publicación Científica 1594; 2012.

6. Naciones Unidad UNDP. Objetivo 3: Garantizar una vida sana y promover el bienestar para todos en todas las edades; 2021. Disponible en: https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals#salud-y-bienestar/

7. Secretaria Salud de Cali. Plan de choque para la reducción de la mortalidad materna; 2012. Disponible en: https://www.cali.gov.co/salud/publicaciones/19878/plan_de_choque_para_la_reduccin_de_la_mortalidad_materna/

8. Atalah E, Castro R. Obesidad materna y riesgo reproductivo. Rev Médica Chile. 2004; 132(8): 923-30. Doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872004000800003.

9. UNICEF Sinergias ONG. Herramientas para mejorar la atención en salud de gestantes y recién nacidos. Salud materno – infantil; 2021. Disponible en: https://www.sinergiasong.org/cajasdeherramientas/prenatal/directivas

10. Instituto Nacional de Salud; MINSALUD. Vigilancia y análisis del riesgo en salud pública. Protocolo de vigilancia en salud pública. Bajo peso al nacer a término. Report No.: Versión 03; 2016. Disponible en: https://www.subredsuroccidente.gov.co/sites/default/files/documentos/PRO%20Bajo%20peso%20al%20nacer%20a%20termino.pdf

11. Agudelo-Espitia V, Parra-Sosa BE, Restrepo-Mesa SL. Factores asociados a la macrosomía fetal. Rev Saúde Pública. 2019;53:100. Doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001269

Published

2023-12-13 — Updated on 2024-10-24

Versions

Issue

Section

Cali District Secretary of Health. Street 4B #36-00. Phone 6025542267

How to Cite

Evaluation of the obstetric risk in prenatal care in a basic level of complexity. (2024). Interdisciplinary Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 7(2), e-11029. https://doi.org/10.18041/2665-427X/ijeph.2.11029 (Original work published 2023)

Similar Articles

21-30 of 125

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.