Legitimacy of mobile operators in Medellín, Colombia, users: theoretical and empirical approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.7876

Keywords:

Legitimacy, Mobile Services, Customer, Stakeholders, Mobile Service Provider

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to measure the perception of the legitimacy of mobile operators by the users of Medellín, Colombia, founding from a theoretical model based on the relationship between the cognitive, moral, and pragmatic dimensions of legitimacy. The data was obtained from a survey of a sample of 1,094 mobile phone users from the city. The model was validated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The findings show that the cognitive, moral, and pragmatic legitimacy of the users of the services mobile operators are related, from which it is inferred that the operators must develop communication strategies considering all the dimensions of legitimacy to have a better acceptance of their customers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Carlos Vargas-González, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín Colombia

    Universidad de Medellín -Medellín, Colombia- Research Professor of Public Accounting. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9746-6058

    Correspondence author

  • Ivan-Darío Toro-Jaramillo, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - Medellín, Colombia.

    Research professor and editor of the Revista Cuestiones Teológicas, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - Medellín, Colombia.

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-3567

References

ALDRICH, Howard; FIOL, Marlene. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. In: Academy of management review. 1994. vol. 19, no. 4, p. 645-670. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412190214

ALEXIOU, Kostas; WIGGINS, Jennifer. Measuring individual legitimacy perceptions: Scale development and validation. In: Strategic Organization. 2019. vol. 17, no. 4, p. 470-496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018772862

ARORA, Swapan; CHAKRABORTY, Anirban. Legitimate and illegitimate consumer complaining behavior: a review and taxonomy. In: Journal of Services Marketing. 2020. vol. 34, no. 7, p. 921-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2019-0490

ASHFORTH, Blake; GIBBS, Barrie. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. In: Organization science. 1990. vol. 1, no. 2, p. 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.177

BAHRI-AMMARI, Nedra; BILGIHAN, Anil. Customer retention to mobile telecommunication service providers: the roles of perceived justice and customer loyalty program. In: International Journal of Mobile Communications. 2019. vol. 17, no. 1, p. 82-107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2019.096518

BITEKTINE, Alex. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. In: Academy of management review. 2011. vol. 36, no. 1, p. 151-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.55662572

BITEKTINE, Alex; HAACK, Patrick. The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. In: Academy of Management Review. 2015. vol. 40, no. 1, p. 49-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318

BOLLEN, Kenneth. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Jhon Wiley y Sons, 1989. 540 p.

BOSE, Indranil; CHEN, Xi. Detecting the migration of mobile service customers using fuzzy clustering. In: Information & Management. 2015. vol. 52, no. 2, p. 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.11.001

BOWEN, Frances. Marking their own homework: The pragmatic and moral legitimacy of industry self-regulation. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2019. vol. 156, no. 1, p. 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3635-y

BRAVO, Gonzalo; WON, Doyeon. Organisational legitimacy in sport management programs: an application of a scale. In: International Journal of Management in Education. 2016. vol. 10, no. 3, p. 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2016.077504

CALVO-PORRAL, Cristina; LÉVY-MANGIN, Jean. Switching behavior and customer satisfaction in mobile services: Analyzing virtual and traditional operators. In: Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. no. 49, p. 532-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.057

CALVO-PORRAL, Cristina; OTERO-PRADA, Luis. A profile of mobile service users in a mature market: from “uninvolved pragmatics” to “potential switchers”. In: Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2020-0046

CALVO-PORRAL, Cristina; NIETO-MENGOTTI, Mnauel. The moderating influence of involvement with ICTs in mobile services. In: Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC. 2019. Vol. 23, no. 1, p. 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-08-2018-0036

CAPPONI, Giovanna; CORROCHER, Nicoletta; ZIRULIA, Lorenza. Personalized pricing for customer retention: Theory and evidence from mobile communication. In: Telecommunications Policy. 2021. vol. 45, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102069

CERTO, Trevis; HODGE, Frank. Top management team prestige and organizational legitimacy: An examination of investor perceptions. In: Journal of Managerial Issues. 2007. vol. 19, no. 4, p. 461-477.

CHUAH, Sthepanie; MARIMUTHU, Malliga; KANDAMPULLY, Jay; BILGIHAN, Anil. What drives Gen Y loyalty? Understanding the mediated moderating roles of switching costs and alternative attractiveness in the value-satisfaction-loyalty chain. In: Journal of retailing and consumer services. 2017. no. 36, p. 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.010

CLAUSSEN, Jörg; ESSLING, Christian; KRETSCHMER, Tobias. When less can be more–Setting technology levels in complementary goods markets. In: Research Policy. 2015. vol. 44, no. 2, p. 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.005

COHEN, Body; DEAN, Thomas. Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2005. vol. 26, no. 7, p. 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.463

COMISIÓN DE REGULACIÓN DE COMUNICACIÓN. Data Flash 2020-006- Portabilidad numérica Móvil. 2020. https://www.postdata.gov.co/dataflash/data-flash-2020-006-portabilidad-numérica-móvil

CORTINA, Adela. Ética de la empresa. Claves para una nueva cultura empresarial. Madrid: Trotta, 1996. 152 p.

CORTINA, Adela. ¿Para qué sirve realmente…? La ética. Madrid: Paidós, 2013. 184 p.

DAVALBHAKTA, Samira; ADVANI, Shailesh; KUMAR, Shobhit; AGARWAL, Vishwesh; BHOYAR, Samruddhi; FEDIRKO, Elizabeth; MISRA, Durga; GOEL, Ashish, GUPTA, Latika; AGARWAL, Vikas. A systematic review of smartphone applications available for corona virus disease 2019 (COVID19) and the assessment of their quality using the mobile application rating scale (MARS). In: Journal of medical systems. 2020. vol. 44, no. 9, p. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01633-3

DAVIS, Keith. Attitudes toward the legitimacy of management efforts to influence employees. In: Academy of Management Journal. 1968. vol. 11, no. 2, p. 153-162. https://doi.org/10.5465/255253

DAVIS, Keith. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. In: Academy of Management journal. 1973. vol. 16, no. 2, p. 312-322. https://doi.org/10.5465/255331

DEEPHOUSE, David; BUNDY, Jonathan; TOST, Leigh; SUCHMAN, Mark. Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In: GREEN, Royston; OLIVER, Christine; LAWRENCE, Thomas; MEYER, Renate. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017. 928 p.

DEEPHOUSE, David; CARTER, Suzanne. An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. In: Journal of management Studies. 2005. vol. 42, no. 2, p. 329-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.463

DIEZ-MARTIN, Francisco; BLANCO-GONZÁLEZ, Alicia; PRADO-ROMAN, Camilo. Factors affecting individual decisions based on business legitimacy. In: Journal of Promotion Management. 2019. vol. 25, no. 2, p. 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2018.1443308

EESLEY, Charles; LENOX, Michael. Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. In: Strategic management journal. 2006. vol. 27, no. 8, p. 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.536

ELSBACH, Kimberly. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. In: Administrative science quarterly. 1994. vol. 39, no. 1, p. 57-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393494

FREEMAN, Edward. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. New York: Cambridge university press, 2010. 276 p.

GIRSCHIK, Verena. Managing legitimacy in business‐driven social change: The role of relational work. In: Journal of Management Studies. 2020. vol. 57, no. 4, p. 775-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12544

GOLANT, Benjamin; SILLINCE, John. The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. In: Organization Studies. 2007. vol. 28, no. 8 1149–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607075671

HUANG, Eugenia; LIN, Sheng; FAN, Ya. MS-QUAL: Mobile service quality measurement. In: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2015. vol. 14, no. 2, p. 126-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.01.003

JEONG, Young; KIM, Tai. Between legitimacy and efficiency: An institutional theory of corporate giving. In: Academy of Management Journal. 2019. vol. 62, no. 5, p. 1583-1608. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0575

KATZ, Michael; SHAPIRO, Carl. Systems competition and network effects. In: Journal of economic perspectives. 1994. vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93

KOMULAINEN, Hanna; SARANIEMI, Saila. Customer centricity in mobile banking: a customer experience perspective. In: International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2019. vol. 37, no. 9, p. 1082-1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2017-0245

KUMAR, Archana; LIM, Heejin. Age differences in mobile service perceptions: comparison of Generation Y and baby boomers. In: Journal of services marketing. 2008. vol. 22, no. 7, p. 568-577. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040810909695

KURUPPU, Sanjaya; MILNE, Markus; TILT, Carol. Gaining, maintaining and repairing organisational legitimacy: when to report and when not to report. In: Accounting, Auditing y Accountability Journal. 2019. vol. 32, no. 7, p. 2062-2087. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1282

LOCK, Irina; SCHULZ-KNAPPE, Charlotte. Credible corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication predicts legitimacy. In: Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 2019. vol. 24, no. 1, p. 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0071

MARTÍN-DE CASTRO, Gregorio. Exploring the market side of corporate environmentalism: Reputation, legitimacy and stakeholders' engagement. In: Industrial Marketing Management. 2020. no. 92, p. 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.010

MARTÍNEZ, Natalia; CUERVO, Tatiana; DEL CASTILLO, Cristina. Legitimacy and Reputation of Organizations: Their Relationship with Management Systems and Financial Performance. In: DÍEZ-DE-CASTRO, Emilio; PERIS-ORTIZ Marta. Organizational Legitimacy. Cham: Springer, 2018, 303 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_9

MASSEY, Joseph. Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organizations in crisis. In: The Journal of Business Communication. 2001. vol. 38, no. 2, p. 153-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360103800202

MÎNDRILĂ, Diana. Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: A comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. In: International Journal of Digital Society. 2010. vol. 1, no. 1, p. 60-66.

MINTIC. Telefonía Móvil. 2022. https://colombiatic.mintic.gov.co/679/w3-propertyvalue-47274.html

MISHRA, Arunodaya; SINGH, Rahul; MOTWANI, Deepak. Multi-criteria assessment of cellular mobile telephone service providers using intuitionistic fuzzy WASPAS method with similarity measures. In: Granular Computing. 2019. vol. 4, no. 3, p. 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-018-0114-5

MITCHELL, Ronald; AGLE, Bradley; WOOD, Donna. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. In: Academy of management review. 1997. vol. 22, no. 4, p. 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

NAGY, Brian; RUTHERFORD, Matthew; TRUONG, Yang; POLLACK, Jeffrey. Development of the legitimacy threshold scale. In: Journal of Small Business Strategy. 2017. vol. 27, no. 3, p. 50-58.

NAVIS, Chad; GLYNN, Mary. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. In: Academy of Management Review. 2011. vol. 36, no. 3, p. 479-499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.0361

NG, Dasmond. Should all Stakeholders be Treated Fairly? Identifying Stakeholders that Legitimately Matter. In: Organization Management Journal. 2019. vol. 16, no. 4, p. 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1679079

OTZEN, Tamara; MANTEROLA, Carlos. Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International journal of morphology. 2017, vol. 35, no 1, p. 227-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037

PATRIOTTA, Gerardo; GOND, Jean; SCHULTZ, Friederke. Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. In: Journal of Management Studies. 2011. vol. 48, no. 8, p. 1804-1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x

PRADO-ROMAN, Camilo; DIEZ-MARTIN, Francisco; BLANCO-GONZALEZ, Alicia. The effect of communication on the legitimacy and performance of organizations. In: Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios. 2020. vol. 22, no 3, p. 565-581. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4071

PRASHANTHAM, Shameen, KUMAR, K. Y BHATTACHARYYA, Sumelika. International new ventures from emerging economies: Network connectivity and legitimacy building. In: Management and Organization Review. 2019. vol. 15, no. 3, p. 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2019.22

PROVASNEK, Anna; SCHMID, Erwin; STEINER, Gerald. Stakeholder engagement: keeping business legitimate in Austria’s natural mineral water bottling industry. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2018. vol. 150, no. 2, p. 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3121-y

SCHEIN, Edgar; LIPPITT, Gordon. Supervisory attitudes toward the legitimacy of influencing subordinates. In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1966. vol. 2, no. 2, p. 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188636600200207

SCHEIN, Edgar; OTT, Steven. The legitimacy of organizational influence. In: American Journal of Sociology. 1962. vol. 67, no. 6, p. 682-689. https://doi.org/10.1086/223233

SCHERER, Andreas; PALAZZO, Guido; SEIDL, David. Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. In: Journal of management studies. 2013. vol. 50, no. 2, p. 259-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12014

SCOTT, Richard. Institutions and organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995. 360 p.

SEMANA. Operadores de telecomunicaciones se quejan ante Ocde por "dominancia" de Claro. 2020. https://www.semana.com/empresas/articulo/operadores-se-quejan-ante-la-ocde-por-presunta-dominancia-de-claro/305370/

SUCHMAN, Mark. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. In: Academy of Management Review. 1995. vol. 20, no. 3, p. 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

THOMAS, Tom. Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. In: Business Strategy and the Environment. 2005. vol. 14, no. 3, p. 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.446

TOST, Leigh. An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. In: Academy of management review. 2011. vol. 36, no. 4, p. 686-710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0227

TSENG, Fan; CHENG, T.C.E.; LI, Kai; TENG, Ching. How does media richness contribute to customer loyalty to mobile instant messaging? In: Internet Research. 2017. vol. 27, no. 3, p. 520-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2016-0181

ÜBERBACHER, Florian. Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. In: Journal of Management Studies. 2014. vol. 51, no. 4, p. 667-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12077

VARGO, Sthephen; LUSCH, Robert. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. In: Journal of marketing. 2004. vol. 68, no. 1, p. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

WANG, Wei; OU, Wei; CHEN, Wen. The impact of inertia and user satisfaction on the continuance intentions to use mobile communication applications: A mobile service quality perspective. In: International Journal of Information Management. 2019. no. 44, p. 178-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.011

WEBB, Justin; TIHANYI, Laszlo; IRELAND, Duane; SIRMON, David. You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. In: Academy of Management Review. 2009. vol. 34, no. 3, p. 492-510. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40632826

YIM, Myungoc; PARK, Hyun. Why legitimacy matters in crisis communication: A case study of the “Nut Rage” incident on Korean Air. In: Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 2019. vol. 33, no. 2, p. 172-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816360

ZHANG, Jianhong; DEEPHOUSE, David; VAN GORP, Désirée; EBBERS, Haico. Individuals’ Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Emerging Market Multinationals: Ethical Foundations and Construct Validation. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2020. no. 176, p. 801-825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04599-x

ZIMMERMAN, Monica; ZEITZ, Gerarld. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. In: Academy of Management Review. 2002. vol. 27, no. 3, p. 414–431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389921

Published

2022-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Legitimacy of mobile operators in Medellín, Colombia, users: theoretical and empirical approach. (2022). Entramado, 18(1), e-7876. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.7876

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.