CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Authors

  • LILIANA ELIZABETH RUIZ ACOSTA Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
  • DAVID ANDRÉS CAMARGO MAYORGA Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
  • OCTAVIO CARDONA GARCÍA Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2020v18n32.7116

Keywords:

social performance, financial performance, scientometrics, research trends, sustainability

Abstract

This article presents a bibliometric analysis of 994 documents published during the period between 1973 and 2018. The objective was to identify authors, topics and classify in clusters the publications that relate the social and financial performance of companies. For this purpose, a quantitative systematic review of the information retrieved from Google Scholar, Dimensions, Scopus and Web of Science was carried out using the Publish or Perish and VOSviewer software. As a result, seven clusters were obtained: social responsibility and implications; environmental responsibility; communication and social and environmental reports; corporate social responsibility and financial performance; communication with the consumer; ethics, accounting and administrative tools; sustainability. In addition, it was found that the subject has generated more articles but these are less and less cited; that stakeholder theory predominates as the main axis of the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and financial performance; and that the documents come mainly from English-speaking countries, which at the same time are the ones that generate the most connections with each other in the citations of the articles.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210418905

An, X., & Wu, Q. (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88(1), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0374-1

De Bakker, F.; Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society; Chicago, 44(3), 283-317. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/10.1177/0007650305278086

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 197-218.

Batista, P.; Campiteli, M.; Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.

Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.299

Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, (34), 39-48.

Carter, C., & Rogers, D. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38(5), 360-387.

Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of management review, 20(1), 92-117.

Darko, A.; Chan, A.; Huo, X., & Owusu-Manu, D-G. (2019). A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Building and Environment, 149, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.059

Dorta, M., & Dorta, P. (2016). ¿Se ajustan las ventanas fijas de citación a las velocidades de maduración del impacto de las revistas científicas? Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información, 68, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.02.004

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.

Feng, Y.; Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.-H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.018

Figge, F.; Tobias, Hahn; Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339

Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9

Gray, R.; Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77.

Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.

He, Q. (1999). Knowledege Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-159. Recuperado de: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/8267/librarytrendsv48i1i_opt.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Herrera, J.; Larrán, M.; Lechuga, M., & Martínez-Martínez, D. (2015). Evolución de la literatura sobre la responsabilidad social en pymes como disciplina científica. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 24(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2014.06.001

Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.

Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.

Jaén, M.; Auletta, N.; Bruni, J., & Pocaterra, M. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of indexed research on corporate social responsibility in Latin America (2000-2017). Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 31(1), 105-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-06-2017-0190

Lulewicz-Sas, A. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Light of Management Science – Bibliometric Analysis. Procedia Engineering, 182, 412-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.124

Martínez, A.; Cabeza, L., & Marbella, F. (2013). Responsabilidad social corporativa y resultado financiero: evidencia sobre la doble dirección de la causalidad en el sector de las Cajas de Ahorros. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 16(1), 56-68.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.

Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. (2010). Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management. Scientometrics, 85(2), 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0270-0

Mitchell, R.; Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Orlitzky, M.; Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.

Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916.

Ruiz, L.; Camargo, D. & Muñoz, N. (2020). Relación entre responsabilidad social empresarial y rentabilidad: una revisión de literatura. Encuentros, 18(02). https://doi.org/10.15665/encuen.v18i02.2406

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.

Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.

Sikacz, H. (2017). CSR Reporting as an Object of Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications. Raportowanie CSR Jako Obiekt Analizy Bibliometrycznej Publikacji Naukowych, (474), 160.

Sidiropoulos, A.; Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253-280.
Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.

Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y., & Wang, B. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 1072-1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.183

Zhang, C. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One, 4(5), e5429.

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2021-01-21

How to Cite

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. (2021). Criterio Libre, 18(32), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2020v18n32.7116