Exploring some biases in the ethical judgement of Managers: An empirical Study

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2017v13n2.26240

Palavras-chave:

Ethics, ethical judgment, moral biases, managers

Resumo

One of the main and most challenging tasks of managers is to judge their own actions and, even more, the actions of others. There are different biases that might affect the accuracy of their ethical judgment. Two of the most common biases studied are the group affiliation bias and the want/should conflict. In the present study, by empirical means, we analyzed these biases in the ethical judgment of managers. Examining answers of 153 effective respondents, we found significant differences in some of the four categories of ethical decision making studied, especially in the use of working time, money management and the use of corporate assets. We also explored some demographic characteristics of the managers, finding gender and level of study as the most relevant ones which play an important role on how they assess their own past and future behavior and the behavior of others. Although, we obtained somehow mixed results, they show that there seems to be a tendency within managers, to judge harder moral behavior of others compared to the judgment of their own ethical behavior. Furthermore, managers judge others, contrary to expected, harder if they know them than if they do not.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

AINSLIE, George. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. En: Psychological bulletin. 1975. vol. 82, no. 4, p. 463

BANAJI, Mahzarin., BAZERMAN, Max. y CHUGH, Dolly. How (Un)Ethical Are You? En: Harvard Business Review. 2003. vol. 81, no. 12, p. 56-64

BARON, Jonathan. Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press, 2000. 9780521659727.

BATSON, Daniel, KOBRYNOWICZ, Diane, DINNERSTEIN, Jessica, KAMPF, Hannah y WILSON, Angela. In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. vol. 72, no. 6, p. 1335-1348

BATSON, Daniel, THOMPSON, Elizabeth y CHEN, Humbert. Moral Hypocrisy: Addressing Some Alternatives. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. vol. 83, no. 2, p. 330-339

BAZERMAN, Max. y GINO, Francesca. Behavioral Ethics: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Moral Judgment and Dishonesty. En: Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2012/12/01, 2012. vol. 8, no. 1, p. 85-104

BAZERMAN, Max. y TENBRUNSEL, Ann. Ethical Breakdowns. En: Harvard Business Review. 2011. vol. 89, no. 4, p. 58-65

BAZERMAN, Max., TENBRUNSEL, Ann. y WADE-BENZONI, Kimberly. Negotiating With Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences. En: Academy of Management Review. 1998. vol. 23, no. 2, p. 225-241

BREWER, Marilynn B. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. En: Psychological Bulletin. 1979. vol. 86, no. 2, p. 307-324

CARROLL, Archie B. In search of the moral manager. En: Business Horizons 1987. Vol 30 no. 2 : 7-15.

CARROLL, Archie B. Management Ethics in the Workplace-An Investigation. 1989. En: Management Quarterly. Vol.30 No.3: 40-45.

CARROLL, Archie. y BUCHHOLTZ, Ann. Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management. En: Cengage Learning, 2014. 9781285974712.

CHAIKEN, Shelly. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980. vol. 39, no. 5, p. 752-766

CHWEPKER JR, Charles. Understanding Salespeople’s Intention to Behave Unethically: The Effects of Perceived Competitive Intensity, Cognitive Moral Development and Moral Judgment. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 1999. vol. 21, no. 4, p. 303-316

COLBY, Anne y KOHLBERG, Lawrence. The Measurement of Moral Judgment, Volume 1: Theoretical Foundations and Research Validation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 978-0521244473.

DESHPANDE, Satish P. Managers’ perception of proper ethical conduct: The effect of sex, age, and level of education. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 1997. vol. 16, no. 1, p. 79-85

DUPONT, Ann y CRAIG, Jane. Does Management Experience Change the Ethical Perceptions of Retail Professionals: A Comparison of the Ethical Perceptions of Current Students with those of Recent Graduates? En: Journal of Business Ethics. 1996. vol. 15, no. 8, p. 815-826.

EPLEY, Nicholas y CARUSO, Eugene M. Egocentric Ethics. En: Social Justice Research. 2004. vol. 17, no. 2, p. 171-187

EPLEY, Nicholas y DUNNING, David. Feeling holier than thou: Are self- serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. vol. 79, no. 6, p. 861-875

EPSTEIN, Seymour, PACINI, Rosemary, DENES-RAJ, Veronika y HEIER, Harriet. Individual Differences in Intuitive– Experiential and Analytical– Rational Thinking Styles. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996. vol. 71, no. 2, p. 390-405.

EWEJE, Gabriel y BRUNTON, Margaret. Ethical perceptions of business students in a New Zealand university: do gender, age and work experience matter? En: Business Ethics: A European Review. 2010. vol. 19, no. 1, p. 95-111

FLORY, Steven., PHILLIPS, Thomas J., REIDENBACH, Eric y ROBIN, Donald. A Reply to “A Comment on ‘A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting’ “. En: The Accounting Review. 1993. vol. 68, no. 2, p. 417-421

FORD, Robert C y RICHARDSON, Woodrow D. Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. En: journal of Business Ethics. 1994. vol. 13, no. 3, p. 205-221

GINO, Francesca, MOORE, Don A., and BAZERMAN, Max H.. “No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments.” (2009).

GINO, Francesca, SHU, Lisa L. y BAZERMAN, Max H. Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. En: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 3//, 2010. vol. 111, no. 2, p. 93-101

HIGGINS, Tory., TYKOCINSKI, Orit. y VOOKLES, Jennifer. Patterns of self-beliefs: The psychological significance of relations among the actual, ideal, ought, can, and future selves. En: Self-inference processes: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 6. Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: 1990.

HONEYCUTT JR, Earl., GLASSMAN, Myron, ZUGELDER, Michael. y KARANDE, Kiran. Determinants of Ethical Behavior: A Study of Autosalespeople. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 2001. vol. 32, no. 1, p. 69-79

HUNT, Shelby y VITELL, Scott. A general theory of marketing ethics. En: Journal of macromarketing. 1986. vol. 6, no. 1, p. 5-16.

JONES, Thomas. Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. En: The Academy of Management Review. 1991. vol. 16, no. 2, p. 366-395.

KANNAN-NARASIMHAN, Rangapriya y LAWRENCE, Barbara. Behavioral Integrity: How Leader Referents and Trust Matter to Workplace Outcomes. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 2012. vol. 111, no. 2, p. 165-178

KARDES, Frank. POSAVAC, Stevens. CRONLEY, Maria. Consumer Inference: A Review of Processes, Bases, and Judgment Contexts. En: Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). 06//, 2004. vol. 14, no. 3, p. 230-256.

KOHLBERG, Lawrence. The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. Harper & Row, 1981. 9780060647605

LOEWENSTEIN, George. Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. En: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 3//, 1996. vol. 65, no. 3, p. 272-292

MARTYNOV, Aleksey. Agents or Stewards? Linking Managerial Behavior and Moral Development. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 2009. vol. 90, no. 2, p. 239-249

MESSICK, David. y TENBRUNSEL, Ann. Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics. Russell Sage Foundation, 1996. 9781610443913.

MESSICK, David., BLOOM, Suzanne, BOLDIZAR, Janet. y SAMUELSON, Charles. Why we are fairer than others. En: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1985/09/01, 1985. vol. 21, no. 5, p. 480-500

MILKMAN, Katherine L., ROGERS, Todd y BAZERMAN, Max H. I’ll have the ice cream soon and the vegetables later: A study of online grocery purchases and order lead time. En: Marketing Letters. 2010. vol. 21, no. 1, p. 17-35

MITCHELL, Terence R., THOMPSON, Leigh, PETERSON, Erika y CRONK, Randy. Temporal Adjustments in the Evaluation of Events: The “Rosy View”. En: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 7//, 1997. vol. 33, no. 4, p. 421-448

O’CONNOR, Kathleen M., DE DREU, Carsten K. W., SCHROTH, Holly, BARRY, Bruce, LITUCHY, Terri r. y BAZERMAN, Max H. What We Want to Do Versus What We Think We Should Do: An Empirical Investigation of Intrapersonal Conflict. En: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2002. vol. 15, no. 5, p. 403-418

PARFIT, Derek. Reasons and Persons. OUP Oxford, 1984. 9780191622441.

PETTY, Richard. y CACIOPPO, John. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag, 1986. 9783540963448.

REIDENBACH, Eric. y ROBIN, Donald. Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 1990. vol. 9, no. 8, p. 639-653

REST, James .R. y DEVELOPMENT, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA. CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF ETHICAL. DIT Manual: Manual for the Defining Issues Test. Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota, 1986.

REST, James. Moral development: advances in research and theory. Praeger, 1986. 9780275922542.

REST, James.R. Development in Judging Moral Issues. University Microfilms, 1989. 9781452909745.

RUSTICHINI, Aldo y VILLEVAL, Marie Claire. Moral hypocrisy, power and social preferences. En: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2014. vol. 107, p. 10-24

SCHELLING, Thomas. Choice and Consequence. Harvard University Press, 1984. 9780674127715

SCHWARZ, Norbert. Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. En: Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol. 2. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press 1990, p. 527-561.

SPARKS, John y PAN, Yue. Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 2010. vol. 91, no. 3, p. 405-418

STIGLER, George J. y BECKER, Gary S. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. En: American Economic Review. 1977. vol. 67, no. 2, p. 76-90

STROTZ, Robert. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. En: The Review of Economic Studies. 1955. vol. 23, no. 3, p. 165-180

TAJFEL, Henri y TURNER, John C. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. En: Political psychology: Key readings. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press 2004, p. 276-293.

TAJFEL, Henri. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. En: Social Science Information. 1974. vol. 13, no. 2, p. 65-93

TENBRUNSEL, Ann., DIEKMANN, Kristina, WADE-BENZONI, Kimberly. y BAZERMAN, Max. The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. En: Research in Organizational Behavior. //, 2010. vol. 30, p. 153-173

THALER, Richard. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. En: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 1980/03/01, 1980. vol. 1, no. 1, p. 39-60

TREVINO, Linda., BUTTERFIELD, Kenneth y MCCABE, Donald. The Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors. En: Business Ethics Quarterly. 1998. vol. 8, no. 3, p. 447-476

VALENTINE, Sean. y RITTENBURG, Terril. Spanish and American Business Professionals’ Ethical Evaluation in Global Situations. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 2004. vol. 51, no. 1, p. 1-14

WALSH, Vivian. Rationality, Allocation, and Reproduction. Clarendon Press, 1996. 9780198287728.

WEEKS, William A, MOORE, Carlos W, MCKINNEY, Joseph A y LONGENECKER, Justin G. The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. En: Journal of Business Ethics. 1999. vol. 20, no. 4, p. 301-313

WRIGHT, Scott A., DINSMORE, John, XIAONING, Guo y KELLARIS, James J. Ethical Issues in Marketing: Biasing Effects of Group Affiliation on Ethical Judgment. En: AMA Summer Educators’ Conference Proceedings. 2011. vol. 22, p. 137-138

Publicado

2017-06-01

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Exploring some biases in the ethical judgement of Managers: An empirical Study. (2017). Entramado, 13(2), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2017v13n2.26240

Artigos Semelhantes

1-10 de 20

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.