Are modified manual methods valid to establish Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in clinical laboratories?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.6088

Keywords:

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, Westergren, gold standard, concordance, validity

Abstract

Four methods were statistically evaluated for their validity to determine the alternative Erythrocyte sedimentation rate to that of Westergren, which was taken as the “gold standard”. The methods evaluated were Wintrobe (WB), Wintrobe inclined (WI) at 45° and two capillary micromethods, one vertical (MM) and one inclined at 45° (MMI). A total of 419 samples were processed by the five methods. Concordance (C), sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated.  The results for S, E, PPV, NPV and C were: 93.8%, 93.6, 98.8%, 72.8% and 71% for WB; 86.3%, 85.7%, 97.2%, 52.4% and 54% for WI; 94.6%, 66.6%, 94.1%, 71.4% and 54% for MM and 91.9%, 72.4%, 94.8%, 60.8% and 55% for MMI. The kappa index showed “good” agreement between the Westergren method and the Wintrobe method and “moderate” agreement with the WBI, MM and MMI methods. The results of the present study show that the Wintrobe method is reliable for use in the clinical laboratory compared to the Westergren method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Andrey Payán González, Universidad del Valle, Cali - Colombia

     

                    

  • Diana Maritza Jurado Orejuela, Universidad del Valle, Cali - Colombia

                    

References

ALFADHLI S M, AL-AWADHI A M . Comparison of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Measurement by the Automated SEDI system TM and Conventional Westergren Method Using the Bland and Altman Statistical Method. Med Princ Pract. 2005. vol 14, p. 241– 44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085742

ATAS A, CAKMAK A, SORAN M, KARAZEYBEK H. Comparative study between the Ves-matic and microerythrocyte sedimentation rate method. En: J Clin Lab Anal. 2008. vol. 22, p. 70-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fjcla.20219

BARRETT BA, HILL P I. A micromethod for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate suitable for use on venous or capillary blood. En: J Clin Pathol. 1980. vol. 33, p.1118-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.33.11.1118

BREDA L, NOZZI M, DE SANCTIS S, CHIARELLI F. Laboratory Tests in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases. En: An Update Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2010. vol. 40, p. 53–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.12.001

BRIGDEN M. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: still a helpfull test when used judiciously. En: Postgrad Med. 1998. vol. 103, p. 257–274. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.1998.05.493

BULL BS, BRAILSFORD JD. The zeta sedimentation ratio. En: Blood. 1972. vol. 40, p. 550-559. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V40.4.550.550

DANESH J, PHIL D, WHEELER J G, HIRSCHFIELD G M., EDA S, EIRIKSDOTTIR G. et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. En: N Engl J Med. 2004. vol. 350, p.1387-1397. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032804

DOUGLAS SE, RANDOLPH TR. Development of a micro-ESR system with potential for in-home use. En: Clin Lab Sci. 2007. Vol. 20, p.12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17361962

ERIKSSEN G, LIESTØL K, BJØRNHOLT JV, STORMORKEN H, THAULOW E, ERIKSSEN J. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a possible marker of atherosclerosis and a strong predictor of coronary heart disease mortality. En: Eur Heart J. 2000. vol. 21, p. 1614-1620. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2000.2148

Expert Panel on Blood Rheology. ICSH recommendations for measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (Expert Panel on Blood Rheology) En: J Clin Pathol. 1993. vol. 46, no. 3, p. 198–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fjcp.46.3.198

FÅHRÆUS R. The suspension stability of the blood. En: Acta Med Stand. 1921. vol. 55, p. l-228. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1929.9.2.241

GRIMES D A, SCHULZ K F. Uses and abuses of screening tests. En: The Lancet 2008. vol 371, no. 9629, p. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07948-5

GRØNLIE Marianne; HJORTDAHL Pen. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate; its use and usefulness in primary health care. En: Scand J Prim Health Care. 1991. vol.9, no. 2, p. 97–102 https://doi.org/10.3109/02813439109026591

HACKETT MC, HINCHLIFFE RF, LAYCOCK BJ, LILLEYMAN J S . Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: evaluation of a commercial capillary-ESR tube in a paediatric haematology laboratory. En: Med Lab Sci. 1983. vol. 40, no. 2, p. 183-185. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813439109026591

HASHEMI R, MAJIDI A, MOTAMED H , AMINI A, NAJARI F, TABATABAEY A.Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Measurement Using as a Rapid Alternative to the Westergren Method. En: Emergency. 2015. vol. 3, p. 50-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495381

HENRY J B. Diagnóstico y Tratamiento Clínicos por el Laboratorio. Barcelona. Masson, 1992. 776 p. ISBN:9788445800461.

HOCKING MB, O’BRIEN RN. Importance of convection to the enhancement of erythrocyte sedimentation rates in inclined tubes. En: Biorheology. 1987. vol. 24, no. 5, p.473-82. https://doi.org/10.3233/bir-1987-24505

HORSTI J, RONTU R y COLLINGSA A. A Comparison Between the StaRRsed Auto-Compact Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Instrument and the Westergren Method. En: J Clin Med Res. 2010. vol. 2, p. 261–265. https://dx.doi.org/10.4021%2Fjocmr476w

KRATZ A, PLEBANI M, PENG M, LEE YK, MCCAFFERTY R, MACHIN SJ. International Council for Standardization in Haematology ICSH recommendations for modified and alternate methods measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017;39:448- 457. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12693

LAMBERT E. Manual de Técnicas básicas para un laboratorio. OPS. 1983. p. 418-420. http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/3289

LANDIS JR y KOCH G G. The measurement of observed agreement of categorical data. En: Biometrics. 1977. vol. 33, p. 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

LICHTMAN M A., KIPPS T J., SELIGSOHN U, KAUSHANSKY K, PRCHAL J T.. WILLIAMS J. Hematology 8th ed. Mc Graw Hill. 2010, p. 1588.

LLOYD HE. Estimation of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate of capillary blood; description of a new method. En: Ann Rheum Dis. 1958. vol. 17, p. 234-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.17.2.234

MAHLANGU, J. N., & DAVIDS, M. Three-way comparison of methods for the measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2008. Vol. 22, p. 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.20267

MIALE J B. Hematología. Medicina de Laboratorio. Barcelona. Editorial Reverté, S.A., p 373. 1985.

MONDAL SK, NAG DR, BANDYOPADHYAY R, CHAKRABORTY D, SINHA SK. Neonatal sepsis: Role of a battery of immunohematological tests in early diagnosis. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012 vol. 2, p.43-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2F2229-516X.96808

MONREAL-MALACARA A, RUIZ A L. The Micro-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Newborn Infants. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2020. Vo 218, p. 91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.030

PARIDA SN, VERMA IC, SINGH MB, THOMAS S. Evaluation of micro erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. En: Indian J Pediatr. 1980; 47:381-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02759832

PAWLOTSKY Y, GOASGUEN J, GUGGENBUHL P, et al. Sigma ESR: an erythrocyte sedimentation rate adjusted for the hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration. En: Am J Clin Pathol. 2004. vol. 122, p. 802-810. https://doi.org/10.1309/8H4L-45F5-G0G1-VKY1

RAMADANTI A, HIASINTA R, BERMAWI H, BAHAR E. Procalcitonin vs. the combination of micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for diagnosing neonatal bacterial sepsis. Paediatr Indones. 2017 vol. 57,p.205. https://doi.org/10.14238/pi57.4.2017.205-10

SAADEH C. Review The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: old and new clinical applications. En: South Med J. 1998. vol. 91, no. 3, p. 220-251. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199803000-00001

SABINE JC, NICKOLAI DJ. A microhematocrit method and its use with citrated blood. En: Blood. 1952; 7:1128-1131. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V7.11.1128.1128

SOX HC Jr, LIANG MH. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate: guidelines for rational use. En: Ann Intern Med. 1986. vol. 104, p. 515–23. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-104-4-515

STUART J y WHICHER J T. Tests for detecting and monitoring the acute phase response. En: Arch Dis Child. 1988. vol: 63, p. 115–117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fadc.63.2.115

STUART J, BARRETT B A, y PRANGNELL D R. Capillary blood collection in haematology J. En: Clin Pathol. 1974. vol. 27, p. 869–874. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fjcp.27.11.869

THOMAS RD, WESTENGARD JC, HAY KL, BULL BS. Calibration and validation for erythrocyte sedimentation tests. Role of the International Committee on Standardization in Hematology reference procedure. En: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993. vol. 117, p. 719-723. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8323437

TORRES M. Cell Blood Count Clinical Interpretation. En: Rev. Med. Clin. Condes. 2015. vol. 26, p. 713-725. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2015.11.001

WESTERGREN A. The technique of the red cell sedimentation reaction. En: Am Rev Tuberc. 1926. vol. 14, p. 94–100. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/art.1926.14.1.94?journalCode=art

WINTROBE, Maxuel. Wintrobe´s clínical Hematology. 12th ed. USA. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Eds; 2009. ISBN-13: 978-0-7817-6507-7

Published

2019-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Are modified manual methods valid to establish Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in clinical laboratories?. (2019). Entramado, 16(1), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.6088

Similar Articles

1-10 of 588

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.