Judicial discretion and forced displacement, treatment within the Colombian Constitutional Court

Authors

  • Jeffrey Arcos-Troyano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/1794-7200/criteriojuridico.2%20Julio-Di.676

Keywords:

Forced displacement, judicial discretion, Constitutional Court, philosophy of law, Ronald Dworkin, social rule of law

Abstract

There are transcendental matters within national context of value to the Colombian university, forced internal displacement by violence is one of great importance, however, it found -in this research that the treatment is given within the Constitutional Court, throws into question the ability to justify from the doctrine of law the sense of its judgment on this particular issue; therefore it’s imperative to the Colombian university begins to inquire from matters such as ius-theory, the fundamentals that suffer in the statements uttered the Court, reinterpreting the contributions to the issue can give great writers of contemporary legal thought, as those made by the American jurist Ronald Dworkin, who despite not having written for a legal or political as the Colombian context may substantially account for the role of the social rule of law in their obligation to victims of forced displacement, achieving explain judges and lawyers in an educational thought in which the Court is involved when talking repair and recognition for these people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Arango, R. (1999). ¿Hay respuestas correctas en el derecho? Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
2. Corte Constitucional (2004, Enero 22). Sentencia T-025 [MP. Manuel José Cepeda E.]. Bogotá, Colombia.
3. Corte Constitucional (2010, Febrero 4). Sentencia T-068 [MP. Jorge Ignacio Pretelt C.]. Bogotá, Colombia.
4. Decreto 2569 de 2000. (2000, Diciembre 12). Diario Oficial No. 44.263. Bogotá, Colombia: Imprenta
Nacional.
5. Dworkin, R. (1984). Los derechos en serio. Barcelona: Ariel.
6. Dworkin, R., (1985). A Matter of Principle. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Dworkin, R., (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Dworkin, R., (2012). Una cuestión de principios. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno editores.
9. Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press Oxford.
10. Iglesias Vila, M. (1999). El Problema de la discreción judicial. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y
Constitucionales.
11. Ley 387 de 1997. (1997, Julio 18). Diario Oficial No. 43.091. Bogotá, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional.
12. Muñoz Palacios, J. (2014). El desplazamiento forzado interno en la normatividad internacional y en el
ordenamiento jurídico colombiano. Popayán: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
13. Rodríguez, C. (1997). La decisión judicial – El debate Hart-Dworkin. Bogotá: Siglo del hombre editores.

Published

2014-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles results of research processes

How to Cite

Arcos-Troyano, J. (2014). Judicial discretion and forced displacement, treatment within the Colombian Constitutional Court. Criterio Libre Jurídico, 11(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.18041/1794-7200/criteriojuridico.2 Julio-Di.676

Similar Articles

1-10 of 181

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.