What is territorial between migration and new rurality

Authors

  • Andres Cuesta Beleño, ACB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2016v11n1.496

Keywords:

Migration, Territory, Habitability, Development, New ruralit

Abstract

The present article tries to answer the following question: Why the migratory processes in the municipality of Yopal and its borders generate territorial disarticulation to the detriment of the quality of life of its members? In order to answer this question, it is based on a conceptual theoretical aspects related to the new rurality and territory as spatiality and complex unity, which brings together the spatial and multidimensional aspects of the human being. Methodological meta-processes are used, structured observation, stories and re-signification of the experiences in the informal neighborhoods and in the Populated Centers. Then, a characterization of the migratory processes is presented in the municipality of Yopal, whose consequences are reflected in the disarticulation of both urban and rural territory. It is possible to find a typification of migratory processes, which mark a characterization of territorial disarticulation, such as: migration towards the urban center, direct migration towards the populated centers, stepped migration and rotating migration, in which an alternative production potential is identified on the exploitation of oil, socio-cultural hybridization and the diversity of the potential of natural resources.

Downloads

Author Biography

  • Andres Cuesta Beleño, ACB

    Estudiante de sexto semestre de Contaduría Pública de la Universidad de Cartagena. Integrante del semillero de investigación en estudios medio ambientales SIDEMA, adscrito al grupo de investigación GIDEA. Correo electrónico: carmenrosalesg04@gmail.com

References

AVILA, Cristian O. (2009). “Dinámica de la acumulación de capital humano en Yopal. (Casanare)” Revista Apuntes del CENES. Vol. XXVII-N°46. Colombia.

CUESTA A. (2012). “Ecotono Urbano: Introducción conceptual para la alternatividad al desarrollo urbano.” Ediciones Unisalle. Bogotá Colombia

CUESTA A. (2013). “Sistemas Urbanos: entre lo contextual y lo autorreferencial” Ediciones Unisalle. Bogotá Colombia.

GALVIS A, Luis A. (2002). “Determinantes de la migración interdepartamental en Colombia, 1988- 1993”. Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional No. 29, Banco de la República – Centro de Estudios Económicos Regionales (CEER), Cartagena de Indias, junio.

GALVIS O. (2009) Dinámica de la acumulación de capital humano en Yopal (Casanare). Revista Apuntes del CENES- Vol. XXVII – N°46 Pág. 6

GINI, Conrado, COLINA, María (1946). “La teoría Europea y la teoría Americana de las Migraciones Internacionales” Revista Mexicana de Sociología; Vol.8 No 2. (May – Agosto), pp. 167-194.

MEDINA, C., y C.M. Posso.(2009) “Colombian and South American Inmigrants in the United States of America: Education levels, job qualifications, and the decision of go back home”. Borradores de Economía, 572.

OIM Colombia. Organización Internacional para las Migraciones.(2010) “Perfil Migratorio de Colombia”. Julio. Bogotá, Colombia

PEREZ, E. et. al.(2006) “La nueva ruralidad en América Latina: Avances teóricos y evidencias empíricas” Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia.

MOLANO A. (2011). “De llanos y selvas”. En la Revista Semana: La Nueva Colombia. Publicaciones Semana.

SÁNCHEZ, Fabio; MARTINEZ, Mariana; MEJIA, Carolina (2006), Estructura económica actual del Casanare y posibilidades futuras de crecimiento y competitividad Tomo I y II, documento CEDE.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Cuesta Beleño, A. (2016). What is territorial between migration and new rurality. Saber, Ciencia Y Libertad, 11(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2016v11n1.496

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.