The Urgenda Climate Case: Reexamining its Legal Rationale, Debates and Implications Four Years Later

Authors

  • Riccardo Perona Profesor Asociado, Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, y miembro del grupo de investigación Filosofía del Derecho, Derecho Internacional y Problemas Jurídicos Contemporáneos, Universidad de Cartagena (Colombia). Doctor en Ciencias Jurídicas, Universidad de Pisa (Italia). Director, Instituto Jurídico Internacional de Turín “IgiTo” (Italia). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-3554
  • Josefina Del Carmen Quintero-Lyons Doctora en Empleo, Relaciones Laborales y Diálogo Social en Europa. Universidad de Castilla - La Mancha. Máster en Teorías Críticas del Derecho y la Democracia En Iberoamérica. Democracia E Integración Regional. Universidad Internacional de Andalucía. Especialista en Instituciones Jurídico- Laborales. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Directora del Grupo de Investigación de Derecho del Trabajo y Seguridad Social. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-4886
  • Fernando Luna-Salas Profesor investigador del Dpto. de Derecho Procesal y Probatorio de la Universidad de Cartagena. Magíster en Derecho de la Universidad de Cartagena y Especialista en Derecho Procesal de la Universidad Libre. Doctorando en Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y Criminológicas de la Universidad de Valencia-España. Conjuez de la Sala Especializada Civil-Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cartagena- Bolívar, director del grupo y del semillero de investigación Ciencia y Proceso y codirector del grupo de investigación Derecho Privado, Procesal y Probatorio. Miembro del Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal (ICDP). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4574-6335

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2024v19n1.11358

Keywords:

Urgenda case, legal reasoning, climate change mitigation, scientific evidences

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal rationale behind the key judgments in the Urgenda climate case, including the initial verdict, appeal, and Netherlands’ Supreme Court ruling, exploring the pivotal aspects that sparked debates. By shedding light on these dynamics, some years after the final judgment, the study aims to provide insights relevant to current

discussions on climate change mitigation strategies, legal obligations, and the need for multidimensional approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anant, T. C. A., & Singh, J. (2002). An Economic Analysis of Judicial Activism. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(43), 4433–4439. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412779

Barresi, P. (1997). Beyond fairness to future generations: An intergenerational alternative to intergenerational equity in the intergenerational environmental arena. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 11, 3.

Backes, C., & van der Veen, G. (2020). Urgenda: the Final Judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 17(3), 307-321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01703004

Bergkamp, L. (2015). A Dutch Court’s ‘Revolutionary’ Climate Policy Judgment: The Perversion of Judicial Power, the State’s Duties of Care, and Science, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 12(3-4), 241-263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01204002

Bedoya Jiménez, A. M. (2023). Reflexiones frente a los rellenos sanitarios en Colombia: impacto, tratamiento y pautas para la mitigación de los daños ambientales. Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D´Filippo, 15(30), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.32997/22562796-vol.15-num.30-2023-4249

Bickel, A. M. (1986). The Least Dangerous Branch. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1nqbmb

Burgers, L. & Staal, T. (2019). Climate Action as Positive Human Rights Obligation: The Appeals Judgment in Urgenda v the Netherlands. In: Nijman, J., Werner, W. (eds) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2018. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol 49. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-331-3_10

De Graaf, K. J., & Jans, J. H. (2015). The Urgenda Decision: Netherlands Liable for Role in Causing Dangerous Global Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(3), 517– 527. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqv030

Drenovak-Ivanović, M. (2020). Standing In Environmental Law After Urgenda, Juliana And Covid-19 Crises: Who Should Force Governments To Act In Environmental Issues Related To Climate Change?. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 4, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11893

Eliantonio, M. (2016). The Urgenda case in the EU multi-level governance system. Milieu & Recht, (3), 207-211. [M en R 2016/35]

Government of the Netherlands (2021, September 21). 2022 Budget Memorandum: Resilience and further steps forward. Retrieved from: https://www.government.nl/latest/news/2021/09/21/2022-budget-memorandum-resilience-and-further-stepsforward (last access: July 2023).

Graser, A. (2019). Vermeintliche Fesseln der Demokratie: Warum die Klimaklagen ein vielversprechender Weg sind – Eine Replik auf Bernhard Wegener, Urgenda – Weltrettung per Gerichtsbeschluss? Klimaklagen testen die Grenzen des Rechtsschutzes. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, 5, 271-278

Harvard Law Review. (2019). State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation. Harvard Law Review, 132. Retrieved from https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-132/state-ofthe-netherlands-v-urgenda-foundation/

Kaminski, I. (2022, May 25). Urgenda two years on: What impact has the landmark climate lawsuit had? Retrieved from: https://www.the-wave.net/urgenda-two-years-on/ (last access: July 2023)

Leijten, I. (2019). Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 37(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919844375

Maxwell, L., Mead, S., & van Berkel, D. (2022). Standards for adjudicating the next generation of Urgenda-style climate cases. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 13(1), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2022.01.02

Mayer, B. (2019). The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation: Ruling of the Court of Appeal of The Hague (9 October 2018). Transnational Environmental Law, 8(1), 167-192. doi:10.1017/S2047102519000049

Meguro, M. (2020). State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 729-735. doi:10.1017/ajil.2020.52

Míguez Núñez, R. (2018). Le avventure del soggetto. Milan: Mimesis.

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2019, December 20). Bachelet welcomes top court’s landmark decision to protect human rights in climate change. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2019/12/bachelet-welcomes-top-courts-landmark-decision-protect-human-rightsclimate?LangID=E&NewsID=25450

Perona, R. (2020). II caso Urgenda: aspetti di interesse e spunti di riflessione in prospettiva giuspubblicistica. In H. M. Dias, W. P. Gavião Filho, E. A. Velandia Canosa (Eds.), Anais

do IV Congresso Mundial de Justiça Constitucional: justiça constitucional e os direitos fundamentais de terceira dimensão (pp. 85-96). Belo Horizonte: Editora Dialética.

Rodríguez García, N. (2016). Responsabilidad del Estado y cambio climático: el caso Urgenda contra Países Bajos. Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, 7(2), 1-38.

Roy, S. (2019). Urgenda II and its Discontents. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 13(2), 130– 141. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26739660

Roy, S. (2016). Situating Urgenda versus the Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1132825

Schyff, Gerhard. (2020). The Urgenda Case in the Netherlands on Climate Change and the Problems of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Constitutional Review. 6. 210. DOI: 10.31078/consrev622

Supreme Court of The Netherlands. (2019). The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation.

Taylor, K. (2021a, February 21). Germany’s RWE uses Energy Charter Treaty to challenge Dutch coal phase-out. Euractiv. Retrieved from: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/germanys-rwe-uses-energy-charter-treaty-to-challenge-dutch-coalphase-out/ (last access: July 2023)

Taylor, K. (2021b, April 21). Energy Charter Treaty strikes again as Uniper sues Netherlands over coal phase-out. Euractiv. Retrieved from: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/energy-charter-treaty-strikes-again-as-uniper-sues-netherlands-overcoal-phase-out/ (last access: July 2023)

The Hague Court of Appeal. (2018). The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation. ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2591

The Hague District Court. (2015). Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands. ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196

Tremmel, J. C. (2009). A Theory of Intergenerational Justice. Routledge.

Van Zeben, J. (2015). Establishing a Governmental Duty of Care for Climate Change Mitigation: Will Urgenda Turn the Tide? Transnational Environmental Law, 4(2), 339357. doi:10.1017/S2047102515000199

Watts, J. (2020, April 24). Dutch officials reveal measures to cut emissions after court ruling. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/24/dutch-officials-reveal-measures-to-cut-emissions-after-court-ruling (last access: July 2023)

Wegener, B. (2019). Urgenda – World Rescue by Court Order? The “Climate Justice”Movement Tests the Limits of Legal Protection. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 16, 125-147. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01602003

Wewerinke-Singh, M., & McCoach, A. (2021). The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for future rights-based climate litigation. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. (RECIEL), 30, 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12388

Published

2024-02-12 — Updated on 2025-02-11

Versions

Issue

Section

Law and Political Science

How to Cite

The Urgenda Climate Case: Reexamining its Legal Rationale, Debates and Implications Four Years Later. (2025). Saber, Ciencia Y Libertad, 19(1), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2024v19n1.11358 (Original work published 2024)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 185

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.