Surgical smoke and its implications for operating room personnel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.1.2022.7498Keywords:
Surgical smoke, Surgery, Occupational health, Electrocoagulation, ElectrosurgeryAbstract
Background: Use in various surgical procedures of the electrosurgical unit, laser devices, and ultrasonic scalpels allow rapid cutting and coagulation in blood vessels. It has disadvantages for the patient and for the surgical team, especially for health professionals who spend most of their time working in operating rooms. Exposure can be affected the ocular mucosa, nasal, upper and lower respiratory tract. Effect is directly proportional to the exposure time and can be observed in the medium and long term.
Objective: To describe toxic substances derived from electrosurgical surgical smoke in interaction with human tissue, how they affect health personnel and what controls can be applied from safety and health at work.
Reflection: Gases such as benzene, formaldehyde, and blood cell fragments, bacteria and viruses that are volatilized by this technique. Affect the exposed individual in different ways, either as an irritant of the respiratory tract or producing changes at the cellular level that can cause hyperplasias o cellular metaplasias. There are insufficient control measures in their designs and implementation due to costs, comfort, and staff performance, in addition to no regulations and very few studies that allow us to recognize the problem and generate adequate control measures.
Conclusions: Surgical smoke must be a risk factor widely known by the personnel of the operating rooms and it must be intervened. Their health effects should be further investigated, and regulations be created to reduce the effects of their exposure.
Downloads
References
Spruce L. Back to basics: Protection from surgical smoke. AORN J. 2018; 108(1):25–30.
Navarro MC, González R, Aldrete MG, Carmona DE. Cambios en la mucosa nasal de los médicos por exposición al humo por electrocoagulación. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2016;34(2).
Fox-Lewis A, Allum C, Vokes D, Roberts S. Human papillomavirus and surgical smoke: A systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77(12):809–17.
ECRI Institute. Clearing the Air around Surgical Smoke : know the risks. Health Devices [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.ecri.org/EmailResources/Health Devices/Clearing-the-Air-around-Surgical-Smoke_accompanies_H0613.pdf
Benson SM, Novak DA, Ogg MJ. Proper Use of Surgical N95 Respirators and Surgical Masks in the OR. AORN J. 2013;97(4):457–70.
Pennock J. Surgical smoke: articulating the problem. AORN J. 2020;111(1):P16–7.
Limchantra I V., Fong Y, Melstrom KA. Surgical Smoke Exposure in Operating Room Personnel: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):960–7.
Jamal S, Hassan M, Farooqi M, Ali S. Surgical Smoke—Concern for Both Doctors and Patients. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(December):1494–5.
Hill DS, Neill JKO, Powell RJ, Oliver DW. Surgical smoke e A health hazard in the operating theatre : A study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units. Br J Plast Surg [Internet]. 2012;65(7):911–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.02.012
Tomita Y, Mihashi S, Nagata K, Ueda S, Fujiki M, Hirano M, et al. Mutagenicity of smoke condensates induced by CO2-laser irradiation and electrocauterization. Mutat Res Toxicol. 1981;89(2):145–9.
Carbajo-Rodríguez H, Aguayo-Albasini JL, Soria-Aledo V, García-López C. El humo quirúrgico: riesgos y medidas preventivas. Cir Esp. 2009;85(5):274–9.
Sisler JD, Shaffer J, Soo JC, Lebouf RF, Harper M, Qian Y, et al. In vitro toxicological evaluation of surgical smoke from human tissue. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018;13(1):1–11.
Seipp HM, Steffens T, Weigold J, Lahmer A, Maier-Hasselmann A, Herzog T, et al. Efficiencies and noise levels of portable surgical smoke evacuation systems. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;15(11):773–81.
Rincón RJ. Diseño de salas de cirugía. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2000;28(2):117–25.
Marie-Claude Roy. Guía para el control de infecciones asociadas a la atención en salud. International Society for Infectious Diseases; 2018. Available from: https://isid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/22_ISID_InfectionGuide_El_Quirofano.pdf.
ANSI/ASHRAE/ASHE. ASHRAE/ASHE Standard 170-2008 Ventilation of Health Care Facilities. Atlanta, United States; 2008.
Cabrera LF, Ciro MP, Torregrosa L, Figueredo E. Cirugía durante la pandemia del SARS-COV-2 / COVID-19 : el efecto de la generación de aerosoles de partículas en escenarios quirúrgicos. Rev Colomb Cir. 2020; 35: 190-199.
Lee T, Soo JC, LeBouf RF, Burns D, Schwegler-Berry D, Kashon M, et al. Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018; 15(4): 341–50.
Georgesen C, Lipner SR. Surgical smoke: Risk assessment and mitigation strategies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(4):746–55.
Safety O. Alleviating the dangers of surgical smoke. Quick Safety. 2020. Available from: https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/news-and-multimedia/newsletters/newsletters/quick-safety/quick-safety-issue-56/
Okoshi K, Kobayashi K, Kinoshita K, Tomizawa Y, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y. Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel. Surg Today. 2015; 45(8): 957–65.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs , Volumes 1 – 116; 2021. Available from: https://monographs.iarc.who.int/agents-classified-by-the-iarc/
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEIs. ACGIH; 2021.
Rioux M, Garland A, Webster D, Reardon E. HPV positive tonsillar cancer in two laser surgeons: Case reports. J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2013;42: 2–5.
Mowbray N, Ansell J, Warren N, Wall P, Torkington J. Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(9): 3100–7.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-05-26 (2)
- 2022-02-02 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Colombiana de Salud Ocupacional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.