Risk exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and workers’ risk perception in non-healthcare setting in Hong Kong, Nanjing and Wuhan: A qualitative multi-site study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2665-427X/ijeph.2.10409Keywords:
COVID-19, Non-healthcare workers, Qualitative study, Risk assessment, Risk perception, Safety concernsAbstract
Introducción: Understanding risk perception that hinges on health-protective behaviors is central to strategies for prevention.
Aim: To classify the pattern of potential risk of worker exposure to SARS-CoV-2, and to assess association with risk perception among non-healthcare workers
Methods: In a multi-site, qualitative study, we conducted individual in-depth interviews and mini focus group discussions with employees, managerial staff and self-employees from Hong Kong (n=87), Nanjing (n=60), and Wuhan (n=60) between June 2020 and March 2021. Audios were transcribed and categorized by themes following Grounded Theory approach.
Results: We identified seven major types of potential risk exposure pattern by category of parameters. The risk perceptions decreased among Type A workers, working at fixed location in office, and no/little contacts with clients/customers, and increased among workers having the concern of asymptomatic characteristics of SAR-CoV-2, daily contact with large size of the unfamiliar crowds, unhygienic behaviors of clients/customers, and use of public transportation to commute to work. The notion that the sense of safety deriving from the implementation and adherence with safety measures despite stringency, and trust with the government was most frequently reported in Nanjing and Wuhan.
Conclusion: Study examines COVID-19 risks and risk perceptions among non-healthcare workers in three cities. Variations in risk perceptions were found, influenced by factors such as work patterns and safety measures. Trust in government and concerns about international contacts were common themes. The findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions, mental health support, and inclusive policies to address occupational health disparities and promote workplace safety.
Downloads
References
Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. COVID-19 Dashboard: Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
Jayaweera M, Perera H, Gunawardana B, Manatunge J. Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy. Environ Res. 2020;188: 109819. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109819
Zhang R, Li Y, Zhang A, Wang Y, Molina M. Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(26): 14857-14863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009637117.
Blake H, Bermingham F, Johnson G, Tabner A. Mitigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9): 2997. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092997.
Garcia GLR, Jones AE, Anderson TN, Fisher CL, Seeley KML, Beeson EA, et al. Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5): e002553. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002553.
Shah ASV, Wood R, Gribben C, Caldwell D, Bishop J, Weir A, et al. Risk of hospital admission with coronavirus disease 2019 in healthcare workers and their households: nationwide linkage cohort study. BMJ. 2020; 371: m3582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3582
Chen YH, Glymour M, Riley A, Balmes J, Duchowny K, Harrison R, et al. Excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic among Californians 18-65 years of age, by occupational sector and occupation: March through November 2020. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252454. 10.1371/journal.pone.0252454.
Lan FY, Wei CF, Hsu YT, Christiani DC, Kales SN. Work-related COVID-19 transmission in six Asian countries/areas: A follow-up study. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233588.
Mutambudzi M, Niedwiedz C, Macdonald EB, Leyland A, Mair F, Anderson J, et al. Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants. Occup Environ Med. 2020;78(5):307-14. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106731.
Baker MG, Peckham TK, Seixas NS. Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0232452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232452.
Bui D, McCaffrey K, Friedrichs M, LaCross N, Lewis N, Sage K, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities among COVID-19 cases in workplace outbreaks by industry sector — Utah, March 6–June 5, 2020. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020; 69(33);1133–1138. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6933e3
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. COVID-19 Clusters and Outbreaks in Occupational Settings in the EU/EEA and the UK. Stockholm: ECDC; 2020.
Koh D. Occupational risks for COVID-19 infection. Occup Med (Lond). 2020;70(1):3-5. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa036.
World Health Organization. COVID-19: Occupational health and safety for health workers: interim guidance. World Health Organization. WHO; 2021.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). COVID-19 - Hazard Recognition. U.S. Department of Labor; s. f. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/hazards
European Agency for Safety and Health at Wok. COVID-19: Back to the workplace - Adapting workplaces and protecting workers. EU-OSHA; 2020. Available from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/covid-19-back-workplace-adapting-workplaces-and-protecting-workers
Safe Work Australia. COVID-19 Information for workplaces; 2022. Available from: https://covid19.swa.gov.au/covid-19-information-workplaces
Brug J, Aro AR, Richardus JH. Risk perceptions and behaviour: towards pandemic control of emerging infectious diseases: international research on risk perception in the control of emerging infectious diseases. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s12529-008-9000-x
Smith RD. Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(12):3113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004.
Gaube S, Lermer E, Fischer P. The concept of risk perception in health-related behavior theory and behavior change. In: Raue M, Streicher B, Lermer E. Perceived Safety: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 101-18.
Sjoberg L, Moen B, Rundmo T. Explaining risk perception. an evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, C Rotunde Publikasjoner; 2004.
Renn O, Rohrmann B. Cross-cultural risk perception : a survey of empirical studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2000.
Girma S, Agenagnew L, Beressa G, Tesfaye Y, Alenko A. Risk perception and precautionary health behavior toward COVID-19 among health professionals working in selected public university hospitals in Ethiopia. Plos One. 2020;15(10):e0241101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241101.
Puci MV, Nosari G, Loi F, Puci GV, Montomoli C, Ferraro OE. Risk perception and worries among health care workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from an italian survey. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(4): 535. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040535.
Qianlan Y, Liu Y, Chen A, Song X, Cai W, Guanghui D, et al. Risk perception and Emotion evaluation of Health care workers varied during different periods of COVID-19: a repeated cross-sectional research; Int J Public Health. 2021; 26: 66:613057. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.613057.
Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
Nyumba OT, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N. The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evolution. 2018; 9(1): 20-32. Doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Wuhan Municipal Health Commission. The latest situation of the novel coronavirus epidemic. 2021. Available from: http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/ztzl_28/fk/tzgg/202106/t20210614_1720025.shtml.
Government. NM. Coronavirus Epidemic Prevention and Control Service Area; 2021. Available from: http://www.nanjing.gov.cn/zt/yqfk/index.html
Latest Situation of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Hong Kong; 2023. Available from: https://chp-dashboard.geodata.gov.hk/covid-19/en.html
Lohiniva A-L, Sane J, Sibenberg K, Puumalainen T, Salminen M. Understanding coronavirus disease (COVID-19) risk perceptions among the public to enhance risk communication efforts: a practical approach for outbreaks, Finland, February 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(13): 2000317. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.13.2000317.
Charmaz K. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. En Gubrium JF, Holstein JS. Handbook of interview research: context and method. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage; 2003. Pp 675-94.
Serwaa D, Lamptey E, Appiah AB, Senkyire EK, Ameyaw JK. Knowledge, risk perception and preparedness towards coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak among Ghanaians: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Pan Afr Med J. 2020; 35(Suppl 2): 44. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.22630.
Qiao S, Li Z, Liang C, Li X, Rudisill CA. Risk perception of COVID-19 and its socioeconomic correlates in the United States: A social media analysis. medRxiv. 2021; 29:2021.01.27.21250654. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.27.21250654
Adams-Prassl A, Boneva T, Golin M, Rauh C. Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. J Public Economics. 2020;189:104245. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245
Billingsley S, Brandén M, Aradhya S, Drefahl S, Andersson G, Mussino E. Deaths in the frontline: Occupation-specific COVID-19 mortality risks in Sweden. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography. 2020; Doi: 10.17045/sthlmuni.12816065.v2
Muellbauer J, Aron J. Measuring excess mortality: the case of England during the Covid-19 Pandemic. INET Oxford Working Paper No. 2020-11. Institute for New Economic Thinking; 2020
Rogers TN, Rogers CR, VanSant-Webb E, Gu LY, Yan B, Qeadan F. Racial disparities in COVID-19 mortality among essential workers in the United States. World Med Health Policy. 2020;12(3):311-27. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.358.
Chambers L. Data show Covid‐19 Is hitting essential workers and people of color hardest. Data for Justice Project: American Civil Liberties Union Massachusetts; 2020. Available from: https://data.aclum.org/2020/04/07/covid-19-disproportionately-affects-vulnerable-populations-in-boston/?ms_aff=MA&initms_aff=MA&ms_chan=tw&initms_chan=tw
Schumaker E. In NYC, ‘Stark Contrast’ in Covid‐19 infection rates based on education and race. ABC News. 2020. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/nyc-stark-contrast-covid-19-infection-rates-based/story?id=69920706
Kraemer MUG, Yang C-H, Gutierrez B, Wu C-H, Klein B, Pigott DM, et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368(6490):493-7. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4218.
Tian H, Liu Y, Li Y, Wu CH, Chen B, Kraemer MUG, et al. An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science. 2020;368(6491):638-42. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6105.
Ennis-McMillan MC, Hedges K. Pandemic perspectives: Responding to COVID-19. Open Anthropology. 2020; 8(1):
Reny TT, Barreto MA. Xenophobia in the time of pandemic: othering, anti-Asian attitudes, and COVID-19. Polit Groups Identit. 2022;10(2):209-32. Doi: 10.1080/21565503.2020.1769693
Yuen S, Cheng E, Or N, Grépin K, Fu K-w, Yung K-C, et al. A tale of two city-states: A comparison of the state-led vs civil society-led responses to COVID-19 in Singapore and Hong Kong. Global public health. 2021;16:1-21. DOI:10.1080/17441692.2021.1877769
Hartley K, Jarvis D. Policymaking in a low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Policy and Society. 2020;39(3):1-21. Doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783791
Zhong Y, Liu W, Lee TY, Zhao H, Ji J. Risk perception, knowledge, information sources and emotional states among COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China. Nurs Outlook. 2021;69(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.08.005.
De Coninck D, d'Haenens L, Matthijs K. Perceived vulnerability to disease and attitudes towards public health measures: COVID-19 in Flanders, Belgium. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;166:110220. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110220.
Published
Versions
- 2023-12-30 (2)
- 2023-11-28 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Interdisciplinary Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
