Critérios de desempenho para a tomada de decisões em organizações esportivas: uma revisão sistemática da literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.8769Palavras-chave:
Desempenho Organizacional, Tomada de Decisões, Inovação, Produtividade, Organizações esportivasResumo
No campo da gestão organizacional, a medição do desempenho é de grande relevância, pois mede a capacidade das organizações de atingir seus objetivos. Desta forma, a administração da empresa pode analisar sua gestão em diferentes níveis em relação a processos, objetivos, recursos, estratégias e cultura. Entretanto, as organizações esportivas têm diferentes públicos de interesse e diferentes tipos de análise de acordo com sua estrutura e comportamento organizacional, o que gera disparidade nos processos de verificação e controle associados à medição de desempenho para a realização dos objetivos organizacionais. É por isso que é necessário gerar conhecimento nesta área. Esta pesquisa visa identificar variáveis de medição de desempenho aplicáveis às organizações esportivas que contribuem para fortalecer a tomada de decisões. A metodologia utilizada foi uma revisão sistemática da literatura, seguida por uma análise utilizando o software NVivo. O principal resultado foi a descoberta de sete variáveis principais de medição de desempenho aplicáveis às organizações esportivas: criatividade, inovação, produtividade, eficiência, eficácia, competitividade e lucratividade.
Downloads
Referências
ADAMS, Pamela; BODAS, Isabel-Maria; FONTANA, Roberto. Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. In: Journal of Business Research. 2019. vol. 97, p. 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.071
ANTONY, Job-P.; BHATTACHARYYA, Sanghamitra. Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs – Part 1: A conceptual framework. In: Measuring Business Excellence. 2010. vol. 14, no. 2, p. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011047812
BALDUCK, Anne-Line. Effectiveness in Sport on Micro and Meso Management Level. Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Physical Education. Ghent: Universiteit Gent 2009. 202 p. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/761935/file/4335052.pdf
BENET-RODRÍGUEZ, Mikhail; ZAFRA, Sandra-Liliana; QUINTERO-ORTEGA, Sandra-Patricia. La revisión sistemática de la literatura científica y la necesidad de visualizar los resultados de las Investigaciones. En: Revista Logos, Ciencia & Tecnología. vol. 7, no. 1. 2015. p. 101-103. https://www.redalyc. org/pdf/5177/517751487013.pdf
BONVOISIN, Jérémy; HALSTENBERG, Friedrich; BUCHERT, Tom; STARK, Rainer. A systematic literature review on modular product design. In: Journal of Engineering Design. 2016. vol. 27, no. 7. p. 488-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1166482
BRAND-ORTIZ, Jorge. Impacto de la creación y la captura de valor sobre el desempeño de las organizaciones deportivas: el rol mediador de la co- innovación y la co-creación de valor.Tesis doctoral para optar al título de Doctor en gestión de la tecnología y la innovación. Medellín: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. 2018.
BRAVO-LINARES, D.; ACEVEDO-MELO, Andrés-M.; RUIZ-PATIÑO, Alejandro.; RICAURTE, Luisa; LUCIO-ARIAS, Diana; CARDONA, Andrés-F. Scientific Productivity and Cancer-Related Mortality:A Case Study of a Positive Association in Colombia. In: Journal of Global Oncology. 2019. vol. 5, p. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.19.00164
CAMERON,Kim;WHETTEN,David.Organizational effectiveness:a comparison of multiple models.1.ed.NewYork:Academic Press,1983.292 p. ISBN 0121571807. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10457-6
CHELLADURAI, P. Discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. In: Journal of Sport Psychology. 1984. vol. 6, p. 27-41. https://doi.org/ 10.1123/JSP.6.1.27
CORIAT, Benjamin. El taller y el cronómetro: ensayo sobre el taylorismo, el fordismo y la producción en masa.Traducido por Juan Miguel Figueroa Pérez. 1. ed. Madrid: Siglo XXI. 2000. 216 p. ISBN 978-84-323-0433-0.
CRESWELL, John-W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4. ed. Los Ángeles: Sage Publications. 2013. 273 p. ISBN 978-1-4522-2609-5. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
CROWE, Michael; SHEPPARD, Lorraine.A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor:Alternative tool structure is proposed. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011. vol. 64, no. 1, p. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008
CYERT, Richard. M.; MARCH, James. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. ed. 1. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 1963. 332 p.
DASZYŃSKA-ŻYGADŁO, Karolina; SŁOŃSKI,Tomasz; DZIADKOWIEC,Anna. Corporate social performance and financial performance relationship in banks: sub-industry and cross-cultural perspective. In: Journal of Business Economics & Management. 2021. vol. 22, no. 2, p. 424–444. https://doi.
org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13892
DUROWOJU, Olatunde. A.; CHAN, Hing-Kai; WANG, Xiajun; AKENROYE, Temidayo. Supply chain redesign implications to information disruption impact. In: International Journal of Production Economics. 2021. vol 232. p. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107939
EGGER, Matthias; SMITH, George-Davey; ALTMAN, Douglas. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Ed. 2 London: BMJ Books. 2008. 412 p.
ESCAMILLA-FAJARDO, Paloma; NÚÑEZ-POMAR, Juan Manuel; GÓMEZ-TAFALLA, Ana María. Exploring environmental and entrepreneurial antecedents of social performance in Spanish sports clubs: a symmetric and asymmetric approach. In: Sustainability. 2020. vol. 12, no. 10. p. 4234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104234
ESPINOSA-LUNA, Carolina. ¿Cómo se toman las decisiones organizacionales? Una revisión clásica. En: Sociológica. 2016. vol. 31. p. 43–78. http://www. redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305043762002
GÓMEZ, Sandalio; OPAZO, Magdalena; MARTÍ, Carlos. Características estructurales de las organizaciones deportivas. En: IESE Business School – Universidad de Navarra. 2007. no. 704. p. 1-24. https://bit.ly/3tCvK00
GULLU, Sevim; SAHIN, Suleyman; KIZILOGLU, Esra.The effect of internal and external motivation on organizational trust: a case study on a sport organization in Turkey. In: International Journal of Higher Education. 2018. vol. 7, no. 5. p. 127-137. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n5p127
HU, Kuang-Hua; HSU, Ming-Fu; CHEN, Fu-Hsiang; LIU, Mu-Ziyun. Identifying the key factors of subsidiary supervision and management using an innovative hybrid architecture in a big data environment. In: Financial Innovation. 2021. vol. 7, no. 10. p. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020- 00219-9
KAZANCOGLU, Ipek; SAGNAK, Muhittin; KUMAR-MANGLA, Sachin; KAZANCOGLU, Yigit. Circular economy and the policy: a framework for improving the corporate environmental management in supply chains. In: Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021. vol. 30, no. 1. p. 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2641
KHAN, Sania. Impact of human resource accounting on organizations’ financial performance in the context of SMEs. In: Accounting. 2021. vol. 7, no. 3. p. 621–628. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.12.016
KITCHENHAM, Barbara. Keele University. Procedures for performing systematic reviews.TR/SE-0401. Keele, UK: Software Engineering Group, 2004. 33 p. https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf
KOCK, Alexander; GEMÜNDEN, Hans-Georg. How entrepreneurial orientation can leverage innovation project portfolio management. In: R&D Management. 2020. vol. 51, no. 1. p. 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12423
LAMÉ, Guillaume. Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction. In: Proceedings of the Design Society International Conference on Engineering Design. 2019. vol. 1, no 1. p. 1633-1642. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169
LAZAREVIĆ, Dragan; DOBRODOLAC, Momčilo; ŠVADLENKA, Libor; STANIVUKOVIĆ, Bojan.A model for business performance improvement: a case of the postal company. In: Journal of Business Economics & Management. 2020. vol. 21, no. 2. p. 564–592. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.12193
NGUYEN,Thi-Ngoc-Lan;NGUYEN,Van-Cong.The Determinants of Profitability in Listed Enterprises:A Study fromVietnamese Stock Exchange.In:
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020. vol. 7, no. 1. p. 47–58. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO1.47
NUGROHO, Mulyanto. Corporate governance and firm performance. In: Accounting. 2021. vol. 7, no. 1. p. 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.
ac.2020.10.019
NVivo. Fueling Academic Research. February 20, 2021. En: https://bit.ly/3eO300h
OSORIO-BARRETO, Daniel; LANDÍNEZ-MARTÍNEZ, Daniel-Alfredo; CHICA-MESA, Juan-Carlos. Neuroeconomía y toma de decisiones financieras:
aproximación desde una revisión sistemática de literatura. En: Revista CEA. 2022. vol. 8, no.16. p. 2390-0725. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.1911
PARÍS-ROCHE, Fernando. La planificación estratégica en las organizaciones deportivas. 4. ed. Barcelona: Editorial Paidotribo. 2007. 180 p. ISN 84-
-284-4
QUINN,Robert-E.;ROHRBAUGH,John.ASpatialModelofEffectivenessCriteria:TowardaCompetingValuesApproachtoOrganizationalAnalysis.
In: Management Science. 1983. vol. 29. p. 363-377. https://.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
ROETHLISBERGER, Fritz. J.; DICKSON, William. J. Management and the worker: an account of a research Program Conducted by the Western
Electric Company, Hawthorne Works. 1. ed. Chicago: Harvard University Press. 1966. 615 p.
SCOTT, Richard-William. Organizations: rational, natural and open systems. 1. ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 1981. p. 381. ISBN 0136419771.
SETIAWANTA, Yulita; UTOMO, Dwiarso; GHOZALI, Imam; JUMANTO, Jumanto. Financial performance, exchange rate, and firm value: the
indonesian public companies’ case. In: Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies. 2020. vol. 11, no. 22. p. 348–366. https://doi.org/10.15388/
OMEE.2020.11.37
SARTA, Andrew; DURAND, Rodolphe; VERGNE, Jean-Philippe. Organizational adaptation. In: Journal of Management. 2021. vol. 47, no. 1. p. 43–75.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320929088
SMITH, Edward-E.; PATALANO, Andrea-L.; JONIDES, John. Alternative strategies of categorization. In: Cognition. 1998. vol. 65, no. 2. p. 167–196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00043-7
TEDESCHI, James; SCHLENKER, Barry ; BONOMA,Thomas. Conflict, Power & Games:The Experimental Study of Interpersonal Relations. 1 ed. New York : Routledge, 2017. 280 p. e-ISBN 9781315080642. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080642
WINAND, Mathieu; VOS, Steven; ZINTZ, Thierry; SCHEERDER, Jeroen. Determinants of service innovation: A typology of sports federations. In : International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing. 2013.Vol 13, no 1. p. 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2013.055194
WINAND, Mathieu; ZINTZ,Thierry; BAYLE, Emmanuel; ROBINSON, Leigh. Organizational performance of Olympic sport governing bodies: dealing with measurement and priorities. In: Managing Leisure. 2010. vol. 15, no 4. p. 279-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2010.508672
WEMMER, Felix; EMRICH, Eike; KOENIGSTORFER, Joerg. The impact of coopetition-based open innovation on performance in nonprofit sports clubs. In: European Sport Management Quarterly. 2016. vol. 16. p. 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2016.1164735
YUNIARTY, Yuniarty; PRABOWO, Harjanto; ABDINAGORO, Sri-Bramantoro. The role of effectual reasoning in shaping the relationship between managerial-operational capability and innovation performance. In: Management Science Letters. 2021. vol. 11, no 1. p. 305–314. https://doi. org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.002
ZHANG,Yali; SUN, Jun;YANG, Zhaojun;WANG,Ying. Critical success factors of green innovation: technology, organization and environment readiness. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. vol. 264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Entramado
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
