The duty of Transitional Justice: as a principle and not as a rule of law

Authors

  • Raúl Arturo Lasso López Maestría en Ética y Filosofía Política, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/1794-7200/criteriojuridico.2018.v15n1.5372

Keywords:

Transitional justice, peace, truth and reparation

Abstract

This article takes up the concepts of "principles and norms" defined by Uprimny (2014) and collaborators in their document Justice for peace; Atrocious crimes, the right to justice and negotiated peace, and the concepts "on principles and rules" of Atienza and Ruiz (1991) are added to deliver a conceptual approach that superimposes the concept of the duty of transitional justice as a "principle" and that precedes the concept of "regulated rule"; attention is focused on the Colombian case as a scenario in which it is at stake to address the issue of armed conflict as the need for peace, truth and reparation to subsequently move forward in concomitance with the regulatory duty of the State to investigate, prosecute and punish. It is precisely in this aspect that ensures that progress to obtain a stable and lasting peace as promoted by the current negotiations, based on the understanding that the thesis under this article acquires magnitude when trying to ignore and belittle the concept of the principle, prefixed to the rule rule.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Raúl Arturo Lasso López, Maestría en Ética y Filosofía Política, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia

    Candidato a Magíster en Ética y Filosofía Política, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán-Colombia. Magíster en Salud Pública, Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia. Especialista en Administración Hospitalaria, Universidad Escuela de Administración de Negocios, Bogotá-Colombia. Especialista en Salud Ocupacional, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá-Colombia. Especialista en Docencia Universitaria, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Bogotá-Colombia. Administrador de Empresas, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Bogotá-Colombia. Médico y Cirujano, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán-Colombia. Ha ocupado cargos de mediana y alta gerencia en el sector salud, docente universitario de reconocidas instituciones educativas de Colombia

References

1. Atienza - Rodríguez, M., y Ruiz Manero, J. (1991). Sobre principios y reglas. Bogotá: Doxa. Recuperado de https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjX7sKVue7iAhWmo1kKHQYiATYQFjAAegQIBRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cervantesvirtual.com%2FdescargaPdf%2Fsobre-principios-y-reglas-0%2F&usg=AOvVaw0YgS0L_7pV7c7lK2eLzkZA

2. Corte Constitucional Colombiana (4 de diciembre de 1995). Sentencia C-578. [MP Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz].

3. Congreso de la República de Colombia (1991). Constitución Política.

4. Comité Internacional de la Cruz Roja – CICR. (1977). Protocolo, II Adicional a los Convenios de Ginebra de 1949 relativo a la protección de las víctimas de los conflictos armados sin carácter internacional. [Tratado 08-06-1977]. Recuperado de https://www.icrc.org/es/doc/resources/documents/misc/protocolo-ii.htm#2

5. Scharf, M. P. (2006). From the eXile Files: An Essay on Trading Justice for Peace. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 63, 339.

6. Uprimny, R., Duque, L. M. S., y León, N. C. S. (2014). Justicia para la paz: crímenes atroces, derecho a la justicia y paz negociada. Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad, Dejusticia.

Published

2019-06-20

Issue

Section

Articles results of research processes

How to Cite

Lasso López, R. A. (2019). The duty of Transitional Justice: as a principle and not as a rule of law. Criterio Libre Jurídico, 15(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.18041/1794-7200/criteriojuridico.2018.v15n1.5372

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.