Impact on travel average time produced by transport infrastructure.

Application in urban area

Authors

  • Diego Alexander Escobar García, Ph.D. Universidad Nacional
  • Francisco Javier García Orozco, Ph.D. Universidad Nacional
  • Oscar Correa Calle Universidad Nacional

Keywords:

Spatial Coverage, accessibility, graphs, impact assessment, mobility

Abstract

The Municipality of Manizales is currently
implementing the “Piezas Intermedias de
Planificación (PIP)”, which are instruments of
urban planning that normalize the proposed land
use and new transport infrastructure, seeking to
generate an adequate mobility, sustainable and
efficient. This research applies a methodology
based in accessibility analysis in the operating
characteristics of road network; also, it allows
to compute the impact of a set of transport
infrastructure, depending on operating variables,
new mobility channels, densification and future
population that would have the sectors in which
works are being done. The results show how a
set of transport infrastructure provide greater
accessibility to a particular urban area, linking the
areas of greatest gain in average travel time with
areas of higher density population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Izquierdo, R., et al. (1994). Transportes un EnfoqueIntegral. España: CICCP.

2. Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L., Wigan, M. R.,(1979): Accessibility indicators in transport planning.Transportation Research A 13, 91–109.

3. Zhu, X. & Liu, S. (2004): Analysis of the impactof the MRT system on accessibility in Singapore using anintegrated GIS tool; Journal of Transport GeographyVol. 4. No. 12. pp. 89-101.

4. Geurs, K. and Ritsema van Eck, J. (2001).Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications.Evaluation of Accessibility Impacts of Land-useTransport Scenarios, and Related Social and EconomicImpacts. National Institute of Public Health and theEnvironment.: Availeble in: http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/408505006.pdf.

5. Biehl, D. (1991). The role of infrastructure in regionaldevelopment. (Pion, Ed.) Infrastructure and RegionalDevelopment , 9-35.

6. Loyola et al. (2009). Flujo, Movilidad y Niveles deAccesibilidad en el centro de Chillan año 2007. Propuestade mejoramiento mediante SIG. Revista Urbano, Vol.12, No. 19, mayo, 2009, pp. 17-27. Universidaddel Bío Bío. Chile.

7. Gutiérrez, J. (1998). Redes, espacio y tiempo. Analesde geografía de la Universidad Complutense , 18,65-86.

8. Gutiérrez, J., Condeco-Melhorado, A., &Martín, J. (2010). Using Accessibility indicators andGIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infraestructureinvestment. Journal of Transport Geography , 18,141-152.

9. Kotavaara, O., Antikainen, H., and Rusanen, J.(2011). Population change and accessibility by road andrail networks: GIS and statistical approach to Finland1970–2007. Journal of Transport Geography , 19(4), 926-935.

10. Schürman, C., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M.,1997. Accessibility indicators. Berichte aus dem Institutfür Raumplanung, 39, IRPUD, Dortmund.

11. López, E., Gutiérrez, J. and Gómez, G.,(2008). Measuring regional cohesion effects of largescaletransport infrastructure investment: an accessibilityapproach. European Planning Studies 16 (2), pp.277-301.

12. Rietveld P. and Nijkamp P. (1993), Transportand regional development. In: J. Polak and A. Heertje,Editors, European Transport Economics,European Conference of Ministers of Transport(ECMT), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

13. Universidad Nacional de Colombia (2005). Plande Movilidad para el Municipio de Manizales. Fases 0 y 1.Manizales, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-01

How to Cite

Impact on travel average time produced by transport infrastructure.: Application in urban area. (2013). Avances: Investigación En Ingeniería, 9(1), 51-58. https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/avances/article/view/2734

Most read articles by the same author(s)