Problem Solving as Variational Ways of Thinking in Math Teachers in Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2023v18n1.10232Keywords:
Problem solving, ways of understanding, ways of thinking, Diophantine linear equations, grounded theory, teachers in trainingAbstract
The purpose of the work was to characterize problem solving as a way of thinking manifested by a group of students who are trained to be math teachers. The research with a qualitative approach and a design from the grounded theory was focused on answering the question, how are the ways of understanding and ways of thinking of a group of mathematics teachers in training when they solve problems in discrete domains? The participants were 21 students who took a course in Number Theory in a program that trains professors of Mathematics at the Francisco de Paula Santander University (Cúcuta, Colombia). For the analysis of data from nine teaching experiments and a semi-structured retrospective interview, open, axial and selective coding processes were used. Among the findings is the way the participants interpreted necessary conditions, sufficient conditions, relationships, convergents and the infinite solutions to each problem. These ways of interpreting led students to understand relationships, patterns, and strategies for convincing and solving problems in local contexts. At the core of the theory, ways of understanding and thinking were characterized as a variational process ranging from interpretation as a way of understanding problem solving in local contexts to establishing relationships, creating strategies for generalization, and testing as ways of thinking about problem solving in a variety of contexts.
Downloads
References
Berth, E. y Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology. Reidel.
Bryant, A. y Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656
Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical Thinking: The Struggle for Meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics. Education, 15(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/748986
Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research:Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3ª. ed.). Sage Publications.
Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (2017). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4ª. ed.). Sage Publications.
Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. En D. Tall (ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (Vol. 11, pp. 25-41). Springer.
Ernest, P. (1993). Constructivism, the psychology of learning, and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues. Science & Education, 2(1), 87-93.
Falk, M. (1994). Enseñanzas acerca de la naturaleza y el desarrollo del pensamiento matemático extraídas de la historia del álgebra. Boletín de Matemáticas, 1(1), 35-59.
Gagne, R. (1965). The Conditions of Learning. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ginsburg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the learning of mathematics, 1(3), 4-11.
Harel, G. (2008a). What is mathematics? A pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. En B. Gold y R. Simons (Edits.), Proof and other dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy (pp. 265-290). Mathematical Association of America.
Harel, G. (2008b). DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction: Focuson Proving, Part I. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 487-500.
Harel, G. (2008c). A DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction, Part II. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0146-4
Harel, G. (2010). DNR-based instruction in mathematics as a conceptual framework. En B. Sriraman y L. English (eds). Theories of Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 343-367). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_34
Harel, G. (2013). Intellectual Need. En K. Leatham (ed.), Vital Directions for Mathematics Education Research (pp. 119-151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-46146977-3_6
Harel, G. y Sowder, L. (2005). Advanced Mathematical-Thinking at Any Age: Its Nature and Its Development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0701_3
Koshy, T. (2007). Elementary number theory with applications (2ª. ed.). Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.
Kupisiewicz, C. y Choluj, M. (1964). O efektívnosti problémového vyučovania: výskum vyučovacích metód matematicko-prírodovedných predmetov. Slov. pedagog. nakl
Mason, J., Burton, L.y Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically (2ª. ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Mayer, R. (2010). Problem Solving and Reasoning. International Encyclopedia of Education, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00487-5
Morgan, C. T. (2010). Psikolojiye Giriş. Eğitim Yayınevi.
Norton, A. (2022). The Psychology of Mathematics: A Journey of Personal Mathematical Empowerment for Educators and Curious Minds (1ª. ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181729
Polya, G. (1945). How To Solve It. Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical Discovery. Wiley.
Schoenfeld, A. (1987). Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (1ª. ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062685
Schoenfeld, A. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641-649.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1- 38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Soto, O., Siy, K. y Harel, G. (2022). Promoting a set-oriented way of thinking in a U.S. High School discrete mathematics class: a case study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 809-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01337-7
Steffe, L. P. y Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh y A. E. Kelly (eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267- 307). Erlbaum.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luis-Fernando Mariño, Rosa-Virginia Hernández, César-Augusto Hernández-Suárez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.