Problem Solving as Variational Ways of Thinking in Math Teachers in Training

Authors

  • Luis-Fernando Mariño Doctor en Educación Matemática. Docente investigador de la Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander – Cúcuta, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-6963
  • Rosa-Virginia Hernández Magister en Educación Matemática. Docente investigador de la Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander – Cúcuta, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2638-671X
  • César-Augusto Hernández-Suárez Magister en Enseñanza de las Ciencias - Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira (Venezuela). Docente investigador de la Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander – Cúcuta, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7974-5560

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2023v18n1.10232

Keywords:

Problem solving, ways of understanding, ways of thinking, Diophantine linear equations, grounded theory, teachers in training

Abstract

The purpose of the work was to characterize problem solving as a way of thinking manifested by a group of students who are trained to be math teachers. The research with a qualitative approach and a design from the grounded theory was focused on answering the question, how are the ways of understanding and ways of thinking of a group of mathematics teachers in training when they solve problems in discrete domains? The participants were 21 students who took a course in Number Theory in a program that trains professors of Mathematics at the Francisco de Paula Santander University (Cúcuta, Colombia). For the analysis of data from nine teaching experiments and a semi-structured retrospective interview, open, axial and selective coding processes were used. Among the findings is the way the participants interpreted necessary conditions, sufficient conditions, relationships, convergents and the infinite solutions to each problem. These ways of interpreting led students to understand relationships, patterns, and strategies for convincing and solving problems in local contexts. At the core of the theory, ways of understanding and thinking were characterized as a variational process ranging from interpretation as a way of understanding problem solving in local contexts to establishing relationships, creating strategies for generalization, and testing as ways of thinking about problem solving in a variety of contexts.

Downloads

References

Berth, E. y Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology. Reidel.

Bryant, A. y Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656

Burton, L. (1984). Mathematical Thinking: The Struggle for Meaning. Journal for Research in Mathematics. Education, 15(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/748986

Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.

Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research:Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3ª. ed.). Sage Publications.

Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (2017). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4ª. ed.). Sage Publications.

Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. En D. Tall (ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (Vol. 11, pp. 25-41). Springer.

Ernest, P. (1993). Constructivism, the psychology of learning, and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues. Science & Education, 2(1), 87-93.

Falk, M. (1994). Enseñanzas acerca de la naturaleza y el desarrollo del pensamiento matemático extraídas de la historia del álgebra. Boletín de Matemáticas, 1(1), 35-59.

Gagne, R. (1965). The Conditions of Learning. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Ginsburg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the learning of mathematics, 1(3), 4-11.

Harel, G. (2008a). What is mathematics? A pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. En B. Gold y R. Simons (Edits.), Proof and other dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy (pp. 265-290). Mathematical Association of America.

Harel, G. (2008b). DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction: Focuson Proving, Part I. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 487-500.

Harel, G. (2008c). A DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction, Part II. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0146-4

Harel, G. (2010). DNR-based instruction in mathematics as a conceptual framework. En B. Sriraman y L. English (eds). Theories of Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 343-367). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_34

Harel, G. (2013). Intellectual Need. En K. Leatham (ed.), Vital Directions for Mathematics Education Research (pp. 119-151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-46146977-3_6

Harel, G. y Sowder, L. (2005). Advanced Mathematical-Thinking at Any Age: Its Nature and Its Development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0701_3

Koshy, T. (2007). Elementary number theory with applications (2ª. ed.). Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.

Kupisiewicz, C. y Choluj, M. (1964). O efektívnosti problémového vyučovania: výskum vyučovacích metód matematicko-prírodovedných predmetov. Slov. pedagog. nakl

Mason, J., Burton, L.y Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking Mathematically (2ª. ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Mayer, R. (2010). Problem Solving and Reasoning. International Encyclopedia of Education, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00487-5

Morgan, C. T. (2010). Psikolojiye Giriş. Eğitim Yayınevi.

Norton, A. (2022). The Psychology of Mathematics: A Journey of Personal Mathematical Empowerment for Educators and Curious Minds (1ª. ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181729

Polya, G. (1945). How To Solve It. Princeton University Press.

Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical Discovery. Wiley.

Schoenfeld, A. (1987). Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (1ª. ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062685

Schoenfeld, A. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641-649.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1- 38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Soto, O., Siy, K. y Harel, G. (2022). Promoting a set-oriented way of thinking in a U.S. High School discrete mathematics class: a case study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 809-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01337-7

Steffe, L. P. y Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh y A. E. Kelly (eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267- 307). Erlbaum.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-19

Issue

Section

Pedagogy and Sociology of Education

How to Cite

Mariño, L.-F., Hernández, R.-V., & Hernández-Suárez, C.-A. (2023). Problem Solving as Variational Ways of Thinking in Math Teachers in Training. Saber, Ciencia Y Libertad, 18(1), 435-458. https://doi.org/10.18041/2382-3240/saber.2023v18n1.10232

Similar Articles

1-10 of 485

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.