This is an outdated version published on 2023-02-09. Read the most recent version.

Validation of the STANFORD PRESENTEEISM SCALE - SPS 6 for health sector institutions in Colombia

Authors

  • Erika Arevalo Arroyave Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia
  • Valentina Ospina Martínez Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia
  • Rosa Mary Tordecilla Medrano Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia
  • Carlos Eduardo Rivera Molano Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia
  • Lilia Rosa Betancur Aljure Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.1.2023.7756

Keywords:

Presentism, validity, reliability, instrument, nursing, SPS-6, Health institutions, STANFORD PRESENTEEISM SCALE

Abstract

Background: Presenteeism is an organizational phenomenon that involves remaining at work, but with physical factors such as untreated illnesses and/or emotional factors such as stress, family situations, among other distractions. These conditions represent a challenge for companies because it directly impacts productivity and the achievement of institutional objectives, which is why in recent years it has become a topic of interest in research worldwide.

Aim: To validate the Stanford Presenteeism Scale SPS-6 in health institutes through Colombian context adaptation.

Methods: A study of cultural adaptation and validation of the SPS-6 instrument was conducted with 301 nurses. The validation process included: translation and back-translation of the instrument from English - Spanish - English, application of the Delphi method, pilot test and calculation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient.

 Results: Cronbach's alpha index was 0.637, the linguistic adaptation and the Delphi method favored the reliability of the instrument and its validity, this process allowed the respondents to understand the purpose of the instrument.

Conclusion: The SPS-6 in the nursing population showed that those who manifest Presenteeism have an underlying physical or emotional health condition. The research process shows that the SPS-6 is a valid and reliable instrument to be applied in health institutions in Colombia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Erika Arevalo Arroyave, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia

    Psicóloga especialista en Gerencia de la Seguridad y Salud en Salud en el Trabajo

References

Petit RC, Sánchez LC, Vargas VN. El presentismo: un estudio descriptivo de la alteración de la calidad de vida de un trabajador de pequeñas y medianas empresas. Trabajo de grado, Psicología. Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano; 2012.

Willingham J. Managing presenteeism and disability to improve productivity. Benefits and Compensation Digest. 2018; 45(12): 11–4.

Sánchez DC. Ausentismo laboral: una visión desde la gestión de la seguridad y la salud en el trabajo. Rev Salud Bosque. 2015; 5(1): 43–53. Doi: 10.18270/rsb.v5i1.182

Cardoso dSHE, Palucci MMH, Andres FVE. Presenteeism and musculoskeletal symptoms among nursing professionals. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018; 26 : e3006. Doi : 10.1590/1518-8345.2185.3006

Valera LDH. Los costos ocultos del presentismo laboral en las empresas manufactureras de lima: 2012. Tesis doctorado. Ciencias Contables y Empresariales, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos: Lima; 2015. Disponible en: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/323348207.pdf

Ministerio del Trabajo. Decreto 1072 Por medio del cual se expide el Decreto Único Reglamentario del Sector Trabajo. Bogotá: Ministerio del Trabajo; 2015.

Cicolini G, Della PC, Cerratti F, Franza M, Flacco ME. Validation of the Italian version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2016; 24(5):598–604. Doi : 10.1111/jonm.12362

Yoshida M, Miki A. Factors related to presenteeism in young and middle-aged nurses. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2018; 60(2):31–40. Doi : 10.1539/sangyoeisei.17-019-b

Moreno JB, Báez LC. Factores y riesgos psicosociales, formas, consecuencias, medidas y buenas prácticas. España: Instituto nacional de seguridad e higiene en el trabajo; 2010.

López REM, Riaño CMI. Presentismo y su relación con la seguridad y salud en el trabajo: una revisión de la literatura. Rev Mov Cient. 2015; 9(1): 50-59.

Isaacs CMA. Presentismo laboral: una mirada desde la salud ocupacional como nuevo factor de riesgo laboral. Trabajo de grado. Maestría en Salud Ocupacional y Ambiental, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; 2018

Arteaga O, Vera A, Carrasco C, Contreras G. Presentismo y su relevancia para la salud ocupacional en Chile. Cienc Trab. 2007; 9(24): 61-63.

Frauendorf R, de Medeiros Pinheiro M, Ciconelli RM. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Stanford presenteeism scale-6 and work instability scale for ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2014; 33(12):1751–7. Doi : 10.1007/s10067-013-2429-6

Jiménez Paneque R. Metodología de la Investigación: elementos básicos para la investigación clínica. Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 1998.

Letvak SA, Ruhm CJ, Gupta SN. Original research: Nurses’ presenteeism and its effects on self-reported quality of care and costs. Am J Nurse. 2012; 112(2): 30–8. Doi : 10.1097/01.naj.0000411176.15696.f9

Pérez LC. Métodos estadísticos avanzados con SPSS. Madrid: Ediciones Paraninfo; 2005.

Ledesma R, Molina IG, Mora PV. Análisis de consistencia interna mediante Alfa de Cronbach: un programa basado en gráficos dinâmicos. Psico-USF. 2002; 7(2): 143-152

Frías-Navarro D, Pascual-Soler M. Lectura crítica y recomendaciones para redactar el informe de investigación.. En: Research design, analysis and writing of results. Universidad de Valencia. España; 2022. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/kngtp.

Hutting N, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, Staal JB, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG. Development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6). J Occup Rehabil. 2014; 24(2): 268–77. Doi : 10.1007/s10926-013-9453-x

Paschoalin HC, Griep RH, Lisboa MTL, Bandeira de Mello DC. Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale for the evaluation of presenteeism for Brazilian Portuguese. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013; 21(1):388–95. Doi : 10.1590/s0104-11692013000100014

Dai J, Hua Y, Zhang H, Huang L, Fu H. Association between occupational stress and presenteeism among medical staff at grade A tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2015;33(10):723–6.

Lalić H, Hromin M. Presenteeism towards absenteeism: Manual work versus sedentary work, private versus governmental – A Croatian review. Coll Antropol. 2012 ; 36(1):111–6.

Mandiracioglu A, Bolukbas O, Demirel M, Gumeli F. Factors related to presenteeism among employees of the private sector. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(1):80–5. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1017967

Published

2023-02-09

Versions

Issue

Section

Scientific or technological research article

How to Cite

Validation of the STANFORD PRESENTEEISM SCALE - SPS 6 for health sector institutions in Colombia. (2023). Revista Colombiana De Salud Ocupacional, 13(1), e-7756. https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.2.2022.7756

Similar Articles

1-10 of 249

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.