And who cares for the caregivers?. A participatory action research approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.1.2019.6077Keywords:
Participatory action research, young, caregivers, disability, teachers, perception, emotionalAbstract
Introduction: The Participatory Action Research (IAP) aims to be a bridge towards more satisfactory ways of explaining everyday reality, and a tool of action to transform it.
Objective: Know the perception of people who serve young people with different abilities, about the effects caused by their professional work.
Methods: A Participatory Action Research was carried out, with scope until diagnosis, in two groups that provide services to young people with different abilities, in March 2018. The design was transversal, not experimental and field. An unstructured questionnaire was used, preceded by an introductory video and the projection of allusive images (photo paper) to the theme of disability. During the projection of the photo paper, the participants were asked to write the first thing that came to mind when observing each image, explaining later the reason for its text.
Results: The perception of the teachers, in both groups and their occupational activities, was eminently emotional.
Conclusions: The motivation of the professors surveyed about the importance of their work performance can be the engine that impels them to stay in their positions, without making a difference in the salary received. However, it is necessary to continue the research to promote the idea that they find an alternative that allows their emotions do not overflow to the detriment of their health.
Downloads
References
Olive JM. La investigación-Acción participativa. Estructura y fases. En: Olive JM, Montañes MS, Rodríguez-Villasante PT (coord.) La investigación social participativa. El Viejo Topo: España.
Balestrini M. Cómo se Elabora el Proyecto de Investigación. (3ª ed.). Caracas, Venezuela: Editorial Consultores Asociados; 2003.
Banister P. Cap. 7: Investigación-acción. En: Métodos cualitativos en psicología: una guía para la investigación. Universidad de Guadalajara. Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud; 2004.
Pérez S. Cap. IV: La investigación acción. En: Investigación cualitativa. Fundación Dialnet; 2010. pp 265-279.
Fals BO, Rodriguez BC. La investigación participativa y la participación social. Instituto del Hombre Ediciones de la Banda Oriental: Montevideo; 1986. pp 9-21.
OMS. Temas de salud. Discapacidades; (s.f.). Disponible en: https://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/es/
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, México –INEGI-, salud y seguridad social, discapacidad; 2010. Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/discapacidad/.
Muyor J. La (con) ciencia del trabajo social en la discapacidad: Hacia un modelo de intervención social basado en derechos. Documentos de trabajo social. 2011; 49: 9-33
Toboso MM, Arnau RMS. La discapacidad dentro del enfoque de capacidades y funcionamientos de Amartya Sen, Araucaria. 2008; 10(20): 64–94.
Brogna P. El nuevo paradigma de la discapacidad y el rol de los profesionales de la rehabilitación. Cad ESP. 2006; 2(2): 7-11.
Blacher J, Neece CL, Paczkowski E. Families and intellectual disability. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005. 18(5): 507-513.
Luque PDJ, Luque-Rojas MJ. Conocimiento de la discapacidad y relaciones sociales en el aula inclusiva. Sugerencias para la acción tutorial. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 2011; 54(6): 1-12
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2019-06-30 (2)
- 2021-03-04 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Colombiana de Salud Ocupacional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.