Cultural consensus theory and social constructionism

Are they feasible to learn cultural conceptions in occupational safety and health?

Authors

  • Irving M Aurioles-Tapia Universidad de Guadalajara
  • Teresa M Torres-López Universidad Libre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.3.2014.4929

Keywords:

occupational health and safety, cultural conceptions, cultural consensus theory, social constructionism

Abstract

Since labor industrialization, until today, safety
culture has been a key factor in global organizations, a concept defined as
the set of beliefs, norms, attitudes, roles and socio-technical factors to
minimize the exposure of employees, managers, customers and members
of the public to conditions considered dangerous or harmful. Nowadays,
the cultural approach to safety and health consists in identifying and
modeling the culture from an explanatory paradigm.

Objective: Cognitive anthropology and social constructionism offers another perspective to
interpret the culture and provide a more practical view of how this
concept is carried out from within the organizations, and thus achieve to
understand that limitations existing in current cultural models for the
management of occupational safety and health. The theory of cultural
consensus estimates the culturally appropriate or correct questions and
individual differences in cultural knowledge of individual and, social
constructionism as a process by which a selection of socio-historical
responses of ideational contents are studied, on the understanding that
contents as themselves are independent of the socio-historical causation,
therefore inaccessible to sociological analysis.

Conclusions: From the above
assumptions, it is then possible to analyze the cultural concept in
occupational safety and health through cultural conceptions of workers in
any organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D´Andrade, R. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge University Press., 271 (2003).

Noriega, M., Franco, J., Trejo, K., Montoya, A., León, L., Sanabria, C., Cruz, A. Propuesta para la creación del Instituto Nacional sobre Condiciones Laborales, Seguridad y Salud de los Trabajadores. El Cotidiano. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), 1-9 (2010).

Briones, G. Epistemología de las Ciencias Sociales. Programa de Especialización en Teoría, Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación Social. Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior, ICEFES, 232 (2002).

Romney, K., Boyd, J., Moore, C., Batchelder, W., Brazill, T. Culture as shared cognitive representations. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences. 93, 4699-4705 (1996).

Chick, G. Writting culture reliably: The analysis of high-concordance codes. Etnology 39, 365-393 (2000).

Borgatti, S. Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. The Etnographer’s Toolkit Altamira Press 3, 1-26 (1998).

Weller, S. Cultural Consensus Theory: Applications and Frequently Asked Questions. Field Methods, 339-368 (2007).

Romney, K., Weller, S., Batchelder, W. Culture as consensus: A theory of Culture and Informant Acurracy. American Anthropologist, 313-338 (1986).

Brewer D., R.K., Batchelder W. Consistency and Consensus: A Replication. Journal of Quantitativave Anthropology, California EEUU, 195-205 (1991).

Caulkins, D., Hyatt, S. Using Consensus Analysis to Measure Cultural Diversity in Organizations and Social Movements. Field Methods. EEUU., 5-26 (1999).

Borgatti, S. Cultural Domain Analysis. Journal of Quantitativave Anthropology, Columbia, EEUU, 261-278. (1994).

Grant, K., Miller, M. A cultural consensus analysis of marine ecological knowledge in the Solomon Islands. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin, EEUU. 17, 3-13 (2004).

Patton, M. Qualitative Resarch & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, EEUU., 429-541 (2002).

Guba, E., Lincoln, S. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. . Handbook of qualitative research. Sage publications. EEUU. , 105-117 (1994).

Gergen, K. Construccionismo social. Aportes para el debate y la práctica. , (Editorial Uniandes, Colombia., 2007).

Guba, E., Lincoln, S. Guidelines and checklist for constructivist (a.k.a. fourth generation) evaluation. Sage publications. EEUU., 1-15 (1985).

Berger, P., Luckmann, T. La construcción social de la realidad, (Amorrortu Editores, Argentina, 1999).

Luckmann, T. La nueva sociología del conocimiento. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Reis). España 74, 163-172 (1996).

Cromby, J., Nightingale, D. What’s wrong with the social constructionism? . Open University Press. Inglaterra, 1-16 (1999).

Husserl, E. Investigaciones Lógicas II, (Alianza Universidad, España, 2006).

Hsieh, H., Shannon, S. Three approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Sage Publications, EEUU., 1277-1288 (2005).

Cooper, M. Towards a Model of Safety Culture. Applied Behavioural Sciences, Reino Unido. 36, 111-136 (2000).

Published

2014-09-01

Issue

Section

Scientific or technological research article

How to Cite

Cultural consensus theory and social constructionism: Are they feasible to learn cultural conceptions in occupational safety and health?. (2014). Revista Colombiana De Salud Ocupacional, 4(3), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.3.2014.4929

Similar Articles

1-10 of 153

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)