Analysis of Physical Condition and Workload in Administrative Employees: A comparative approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.1.2025.12256

Keywords:

postura de trabajo, carga de trabajo, salud laboral

Abstract

Introduction: The physical load at work directly impacts the physical condition and performance of workers, causing musculoskeletal injuries and pain, as well as physical fatigue and psychological stress. These consequences reduce productivity and increase absenteeism from work.

Objective: To identify the profile of condition and physical workload in administrative officials of a higher education institution.

Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out with the participation of 94 administrative officials of the Universidad Santo Tomás. Physical and postural load was evaluated using the OWAS (Ovako Working Analysis System) model, as well as aspects related to physical condition. For the analysis and comparison between sites, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed by post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the parameters evaluated between the different sites. The p values obtained showed statistical significance, with p < 0.001 in most of the categories analyzed.

Conclusion: The variations observed in the postural assessment of the arms, trunk and general posture, with values p < 0.001, underscore the importance of the differences in working conditions and spatial configurations between the sites, which highlights the need to implement appropriate intervention strategies to improve the health and well-being of workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Isabel Adriana Sanchez Rojas, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS

    Fisioterapeuta Universidad Manuela Beltrán; Especialista en Fisioterapia en Cuidado Crítico Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana; Magister en Educación Tecnológico de Monterrey; Doctor en Educación Deportiva y Ciencias del Deporte Universidad de Baja California. Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS. Carrera 51 #67-70 Edificio Sergio Parra Piso 2. iasanchez@fucsalud.edu.co

  • Simonin Vadim Simon Paul , Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá Colombia

    Maestría en Actividad Física para la Salud. Universidad Santo Tomás, Campus San Alberto Magno

  • Darío Mendoza Romero , Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogota, Colombia

    Licenciado en Ciencias del Deporte Universidad de Ciencias Aplicada; Especialista en Biometodología del Entrenamiento Deportivo Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas; Magister en Epidemiología Universidad CES; Doctor en Educación Deportiva y Ciencias del Deporte Universidad de Baja California. Universidad Santo Tomás. Campus San Alberto Magno

References

Martinez VML. The importance of workplace exercise. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2021;19(4):523-528. doi:10.47626/1679-4435-2021-666.

Blair SN. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(1):1-2.

Straker L, Mathiassen SE. Increased physical workloads in modern work – a necessity for better health and performance? Ergonomics. 2009;52(10):1215-1225. doi:10.1080/00140130903039101.

Jaromi M, Nemeth A, Kranicz J, Laczko T, Betlehem J. Treatment and ergonomics training of work-related lower back pain and body posture problems for nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(11-12):1776-1784. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04089. x.

Alotaibi MM, Almutairi MK, Singh H, Ithurburn MP, Lein DH. 30-second chair stand test predicts countermovement jump performance in young adults. Sports Health. 2023;15(3):452-458. doi:10.1177/19417381221105040.

Kahraman BO, Ozsoy I, Akdeniz B, Ozpelit E, Sevinc C, Acar S, Savci S. Test-retest reliability and validity of the timed up and go test and 30-second sit to stand test in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2020; 304:159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.028.

Mayorga-Vega D, Bocanegra-Parrilla R, Ornelas M, Viciana J. Criterion-related validity of the distance- and time-based walk/run field tests for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151671.

Liu M, Wu L, Ming Q. How does physical activity intervention improve self-esteem and self-concept in children and adolescents? Evidence from a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134804.

Karhu O, Kallio V, Koistinen K. OWAS: A systematic analysis method for working postures. Helsinki: Ovako; 1977.

Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia P, Polli GS, Campos JADDB. Working postures of dental students: ergonomic analysis using the Ovako Working Analysis System and rapid upper limb assessment. Med Lav. 2013;104(6):440-447.

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 64th World Medical Assembly; 2013; Fortaleza, Brazil.

Serranheira F, Sousa-Uva M, Heranz F, Kovacs F, Sousa-Uva A. Low back pain (LBP), work and absenteeism. Work. 2020;65(2):463-469. doi:10.3233/WOR-203073.

da Silva G, Araújo L, de Lima M, de Andrade A. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain among workers in the manufacturing sector. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):110. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-05830-1.

Kothari M, Solanki R, Patel K. Occupational low back pain among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(4):555-563. doi:10.3233/BMR-220194.

Tirtayasa K, Adiputra IN, Djestawana IG. The change of working posture in Manggur decreases cardiovascular load and musculoskeletal complaints among Balinese gamelan craftsmen. J Hum Ergol. 2003;32(2):71-76.’0ñ

Buckle P, Devereux J. The nature of ergonomic problems in relation to musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(10):673-679. doi:10.1136/oem.59.10.673.

Choi B, Kim K, Lee Y, et al. Effects of workplace ergonomic interventions on musculoskeletal disorders and pain among workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(4):849-862. doi:10.1007/s00420-021-01778-7

Arocha Rodulfo JI. Sedentary lifestyle: a disease of the 21st century. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2019;31(5):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2019.04.004.

Arem H, Moore SC, Patel AV, et al. Physical activity and metabolic syndrome in a large cohort of U.S. men and women. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(1):15-22. doi:10.2337/dc15-1496.

Chastin SF, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Burton N, et al. Development and validation of the Sedentary Behaviour Research Network (SBRN) terminology consensus project process and outcomes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):100. doi:10.1186/s12966-019-0872-0.

Fuenzalida E, Beeler C, Sohl L. Workload history effects: A comparison of sudden increases and decreases on performance. Curr Psychol. 2006; 25:8-14. doi:10.1007/s12144-006-1012-6.

Kerner I, Rakovac M, Lazinica B. Leisure-time physical activity and absenteeism. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2017;68(3):159-170. doi:10.1515/aiht-2017-68-2963.

López-Bueno R, Bláfoss R, Calatayud J, López-Sánchez GF, Smith L, Andersen LL, Casajús JA. Association between physical activity and odds of chronic conditions among workers in Spain. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17. doi:10.5888/pcd17.200105.

Proper KI, van der Beek AJ, van der Wal G, et al. The relationship between physical activity and sick leave: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(3):188-194. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.024540.

Grimani A, Aboagye E, Kwak L. The effectiveness of workplace nutrition and physical activity interventions in improving productivity, work performance and workability: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1676. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-8033-1.

Barone Gibbs B, Hergenroeder AL, Perdomo SJ, Kowalsky RJ, Delitto A, Jakicic JM. Reducing sedentary behaviour to decrease chronic low back pain: The Stand Back randomized trial. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75(5):321-327. doi:10.1136/oemed-2017-104732.

Teychenne M, Ball K, Salmon J. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review of the association with mental health and well-being in adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):35. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-00964-3.

D'Souza RM, Tewari S, Sethi S, et al. Impact of workplace physical activity interventions on employees' health outcomes: a systematic review. Workplace Health Saf. 2021;69(5):233-243. doi:10.1177/2165079920970345.

Shrestha N, Loughnan G, Loughrey J, et al. The effects of workplace physical activity interventions on mental health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1328. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13777-7.

Holtermann A, Roepstorff C, Karlsson T, et al. The importance of workplace physical activity for health and well-being: a review of the evidence. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023;49(1):1-10. doi:10.5271/sjweh.4016.

Published

2025-04-22

Issue

Section

Scientific or technological research article

How to Cite

Sanchez Rojas, I. A., Simon Paul , S. V., & Mendoza Romero , D. (2025). Analysis of Physical Condition and Workload in Administrative Employees: A comparative approach. Revista Colombiana De Salud Ocupacional, 15(1), e-12256. https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rcso.1.2025.12256

Similar Articles

1-10 of 180

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.