Ecoliteracy and environmental citizenship: a systematic review of the literature in basic and secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.12782Keywords:
Ecoliteracy, Sustainability, Interdisciplinarity, Green SchoolAbstract
The planet faces increasingly complex environmental challenges, creating an urgent need to educate citizens who are aware of their relationship with the environment. In this context, ecoliteracy emerges as a transformative educational approach that promotes understanding of ecosystems and their interactions. This study presents a systematic literature review with the objectives of: (1) identifying and categorizing educational strategies used to develop ecoliteracy in primary and secondary students; (2) analyzing pedagogical approaches in ecological education aimed at sustainable development; and (3) examining the influence of cultural contexts on environmental competencies. Using the PRISMA methodology, 199 scientific articles published between 2014 and 2024 in the Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed. The results show that most studies were conducted in the United States, highlighting interdisciplinary strategies and the use of emerging technologies to foster ecological awareness. In addition, the findings emphasize the importance of adapting ecoliteracy to cultural diversity and the need for more rigorous evaluation. Thus, this study contributes to the field as it provides an updated systematization of practices and proposes inclusive and contextualized educational models. The findings have implications for curriculum design, teacher training, and public policy. It is suggested to advance toward intercultural approaches adapted to the socio-territorial realities of Latin America.
Downloads
References
1. ABBAS, Herawaty; et al. Ecological literacy and local wisdom of Australian Aboriginal people in Welcome to My Country written by Laklak Burarrwanga and family. In: Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2024, Vol. 14, no. 5; p. 1493–1498. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.22
2. AGUAYO, Claudio and EAMES, Chris. Using mobile learning in free-choice educational settings to enhance ecological literacy. In: Teachers and Curriculum. 2017, Vol. 17, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v17i2.159
3. ALMERS, Ellen et al. Children’s preferences for schoolyard features and understanding of ecosystem service innovations – a study in five Swedish preschools. In: Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. 2021, Vol. 21, No. 3; pp. 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2020.1773879
4. ARDOIN, Nicole M.; BOWERS, Alison W.; GAILLARD, Estelle. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. In: Biological Conservation. 2020, Vol. 241; p. 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
5. BERMAN, Nina. Environmental education catalyzed by tourism: Ecoliteracy initiatives on the coast of Kenya. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021, Vol. 13, no. 15; p. e8501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158501
6. BILIANSKA, Mariia and YAROSHENKO, Olga. Ability to foster schoolchildren’s ecological literacy as a result of prospective biology teachers’ professional training. In: Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2020, Vol. 78, no. 6; p. 907–919. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.907
7. CAPRA, Fritjof. Alfabetização ecológica: a educação das crianças para um mundo sustentável. 1. ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006. 239 p.
8. CHANAPIMUK, Kultida, SAWANGMEK, Sureeporn and NANGNGAM, Pranee. Using Science, Technology, Society, and Environment (STSE) Approach to Improve the Scientific Literacy of Grade 11 Students in Plant Growth and Development. En: Journal of Science Learning. 2018, Vol. 2, no. 1; p. 14. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i1.11997
9. CURWEN, Margaret Sauceda, et al. Systems Thinking in a Second Grade Curriculum: Students Engaged to Address a Statewide Drought. In: Frontiers in Education. 2018, Vol. 3 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00090
10. DA SILVA ANTUNES DE SOUZA, Maria Cláudia, FERRER, Gabriel Real and STEIN, Alex Sandro Gonzaga. Ecological literacy: An effective instrument for sustainability and environmental protection. In: Veredas do Direito. 2020, Vol. 17, no. 38; pp. 291–309. https://doi.org/10.18623/RVD.V17I38.1837
11. DAESUSI, Ruspeni and ASY’ARI. Implementation of ecoleteracy learning design at Adiwiyata School as an effort formation society in alam insan mulia school of Surabaya. In: Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews. 2019, Vol. 7, no. 3; pp. 454–459. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7366
12. DESFANDI, Mirza, MARYANI, Enok and DISMAN. Building Ecoliteracy Through Adiwiyata Program (Study at Adiwiyata School in Banda Aceh). In: Indonesian Journal of Geography. 2017, Vol. 49, no. 1; pp. 51–56. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.11230
13. DLIMBETOVA, Gaini K. et al. Integrating Sustainability into Education: An Exploration of the ‘Green School - Green College - Green University’ Approach. In: European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2023, Vol. 12, no. 4; pp. 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2023.4.1175
14. ESTRADA-PEREA, Betsy Mary and PINTO-BLANCO, Ana Myriam. Análisis comparativo de Modelos educativos para la educación superior virtual y sostenible. In: Entramado. 2021, Vol. 17, no. 1; pp. 168–184. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.6131
15. FERNÁNDEZ-TORRES, María J. et al. Integrating environmental concerns into the teaching of mathematical optimization. In: Education for Chemical Engineers. 2020, Vol. 32; pp. 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.05.005
16. GARCÍA-RODEJA GAYOSO, Isabel, VÁZQUEZ LORENZO, Cristina y SESTO VARELA, Vanessa. Modelos del alumnado de primaria sobre las semillas desde la perspectiva de eco-alfabetización. In: Innovación Educativa. 2020, No. 30; pp. 95–111. https://doi.org/10.15304/ie.30.7063
17. HA, Changchen and DONG, Shumin. Identifying the Most Ecoliterate Inhabitants in a Top-Ten Ecologically Advanced City of China: A Sociodemographic Perspective. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2023, Vol. 15, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043054
18. HA, Changchen. The year’s work in ecolinguistics 2022. In: Journal of World Languages. 2023, Vol. 9, no. 2; pp. 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0001
19. HÄGGSTRÖM, Margaretha and SCHMIDT, Catarina. Enhancing children’s literacy and ecological literacy through critical place-based pedagogy. In: Environmental Education Research. 2020, Vol. 26, no. 12; pp. 1729–1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1812537
20. HAMMARSTEN, Maria et al. Developing ecological literacy in a forest garden: children’s perspectives. In: Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. 2019, Vol. 19, no. 3; pp. 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1517371
21. HIPKISS, Anna Maria, WINDSOR, Sally and SANDERS, Dawn. The girl with the garden gloves: researching the affordances of sensual materialities in the school garden. In: Ethnography and Education. 2020, Vol. 15, no. 3; pp. 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2019.1698309
22. HOLLWEG, K. S. et al. Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. [online]. 2011. Disponible en: http://www.naaee.net
23. HUNGERFORD, Harold R. and VOLK, Trudi L. Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. In: The Journal of Environmental Education. 1990, Vol. 21, no. 3; pp. 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
24. JORDAN, Rebecca et al. What should every citizen know about ecology? In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2009, Vol. 7, no. 9; pp. 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1890/070113
25. KABIR, M. et al. Impacts of anthropogenic activities & climate change resulting from increasing concentration of Carbon dioxide on environment in 21st Century; A Critical Review. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Institute of Physics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1194/1/012010
26. KOYAMA, Dennis and WATANABE, Takehiro. Why a dispositional view of ecological literacy is needed. In: Teaching in Higher Education. 2023, Vol. 28, no. 5; pp. 1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2198637
27. KUMPULAINEN, Kristiina et al. Children’s Augmented Storying in, with and for Nature. In: Education Sciences. 2020, Vol. 10, no. 6; p. 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060149
28. KUŞKAYA, Sevda et al. Editorial: Wind and solar energy sources: Policy, economics, and impacts on environmental quality. In: Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022, Vol. 10; sin paginación específica. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1054259
29. MARCINKOWSKI, Tom and REID, Alan. Reviews of research on the attitude–behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research. In: Environmental Education Research. 2019, Vol. 25, no. 4; pp. 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237
30. MARTOS GARCÍA, Aitana. Ecological readings: Towards a canon of eco-readings. In: Educatio Siglo XXI. 2021, Vol. 39, no. 1; pp. 191–210. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.469231
31. MASALIMOVA, Alfiya R. et al. Trends in environmental education: A systematic review. In: Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2023, Vol. 19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12952
32. NI, Bing-Jie. Grand challenges in environmental engineering. In: Frontiers in Environmental Engineering. 2022, Vol. 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenve.2022.1052154
33. NINSIANA, Widhiya, SEPTIYANA, Linda and SUPRIHATIN, Yeni. Introducing eco-literacy to early childhood students through digital learning. In: Journal of Education and Learning. 2024, Vol. 18, no. 1; pp. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20678
34. OKYAY, Özlem et al. The impact of ecological literacy training on environmental awareness and attitudes of pre-school children. 2022.
35. ORR, D. Ecological Literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. New York: State University of New York Press, 1992.
36. PAGE, Matthew J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In: The BMJ. 2021, Vol. 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
37. PASCUAS-RENGIFO, Yois, PEREA-YARA, Camilo and GARCÍA-QUIROGA, Bernardo. Ecoalfabetización y gamificación para la construcción de cultura ambiental. 2020.
38. PERSSON, Kristin, ANDRÉE, Maria and CAIMAN, Cecilia. Making kin in the forest: explorations of ecological literacy through contemplative practices in a Swedish folk high school. In: Environmental Education Research. 2024, Vol. 30, no. 8; pp. 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2309587
39. PERSSON, Kristin, ANDRÉE, Maria and CAIMAN, Cecilia. Becoming-with the bog born: emotional collectives in ecological fieldwork. In: Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10231-5
40. RAMÍREZ-GÓMEZ, Ruby, PASCUAS-RENGIFO, Yois and MORA-PENAGOS, William Manuel. Estado actual de la ecoalfabetización en el contexto educativo. Una revisión sistemática. Una revisión sistemática. 2023. Unpublished manuscript. Zenodo.
41. RAMOS, Rui and RAMOS, Ana Margarida. Travelling from the city to the countryside: Depictions of urban and rural scenarios in two Portuguese picturebooks. In: Calidoscopio. 2014, Vol. 12, no. 3; pp. 265–273. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2014.123.01
42. RANTUNG, Kezia C Y, WIDIASMORO, Y M S and DEWI, Novita. Enhancement of ecoliteracy for language learners using song lyrics. In: LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching. 2023, Vol. 26, no. 1; pp. 31–40. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5437
43. ROSYID, Novi Utami, BUDIAMAN, Budiaman and HASANAH, Uswatun. Improving Coastal Children Eco-Literacy in Environmental Learning Through Mangroves Storytelling. In: Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. 2019, Vol. 9, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v9i3.3651
44. SADULAEVA, Albika. Evolution of the Global Environmental Agenda: Climate Change, Biodiversity Loss. In: BIO Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20236303015
45. SÁNCHEZ-SERRANO, Silvia, PEDRAZA-NAVARRO, Inmaculada and DONOSO-GONZÁLEZ, Macarena. How to conduct a systematic review under PRISMA protocol? Uses and fundamental strategies for its application in the educational field through a practical case study. In: Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia. 2022, Vol. 74, no. 3; pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2022.95090
46. SHARMA, Ankush. Eco-Literacy: For the Well-being of the Earth. In: International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2023, Vol. 13, no. 8; pp. 2217–2219. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82180
47. SIGIT, Diana Vivanti et al. Ecoliteracy’s contribution to creative thinking: a study of senior high school students. In: Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2023, Vol. 20, no. 2; pp. 356–368. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.020
48. SOULÉ, Moussa, NYAMEKYE, Clement and ABDOUL-AZIZE, Hamidou Taffa. Woody species in the urban schoolyards in West Africa Sahel cities in Niger: diversity and benefits for green schools. In: Discover Sustainability. 2022, Vol. 3, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00092-9
49. STAHLSCHMIDT, Stephan and STEPHEN, Dimity. From indexation policies through citation networks to normalized citation impacts: Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions as varying resonance chambers. In: Scientometrics. 2022, Vol. 127, no. 5; pp. 2413–2431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04309-6
50. SUWANDI, Sarwiji et al. The analysis of Ecoliteracy elements in language textbooks. In: Cogent Education. 2024, Vol. 11, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2300907
51. TARTÉ, Rodrigo. Analfabetismo y Complejidad. In: Analfabetismo ecológico: el conocimiento en tiempos de crisis. Ciudad de Panamá: Editorial Ciudad del Saber, 2012.
52. TIMMIS, Kenneth and VERSTRAETE, Willy. Multiple intertwined crises facing humanity necessitate a European Environmental Research Organization. In: Microbial Biotechnology. 2022, Vol. 15, no. 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14054
53. UTOMO, Mohamad Hadi et al. Delevoping green behaviour in Indonesia: Why does Adiwiyata school matter? In: Journal of Sustainability Science and Management. 2023, Vol. 18, no. 5; pp. 33–51. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2023.05.003
54. VAN RHEENEN, Derek and MELO, Ricardo. Nature sports: Prospects for sustainability. In: Sustainability. 2021, Vol. 13, no. 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168732
55. WEST, Sarah E. Understanding participant and practitioner outcomes of environmental education. In: Environmental Education Research. 2013, Vol. 21, no. 1; pp. 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.879695
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Entramado

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.