Predictive model of maritime port transport of cargo mobilized incabotage and transshipment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2025v23n43.13296

Keywords:

maritime transport, port cargo, cabotage, transshipment, predictive model

Abstract

Although there have been some advances in maritime transport and port operations, it remains necessary to understand the transport sector related to cargo movement through the various authorized ports in Colombia, as this constitutes a strategic factor for international trade. Despite the fact that monitoring is carried out through reports from public and private port companies via the Transport Supervision Information System (VIGIA), significant gaps persist both in the understanding of coastal maritime transport (cabotage) and in the recording of cargo tonnage moved by port zone, port traffic, type of traffic, type of cargo, and port company. These aspects are essential for strategic decision making. The purpose of this study was to analyze the types of port cargo moved in cabotage and transshipment operations Colombian ports. To this end, the CART (Classification and Regression Trees) methodology—an automatic supervised learning algorithm—was applied. The secondary data used came from datasets provided by public and private port companies, totaling 7,139 records corresponding to public and private port zones in the country between 2018 and March 2024. The results present a predictive model based on machine learning for cargo type classification, using a decision tree with a categorical target variable that distinguishes between bulk coal cargo, containers, general cargo, liquid bulk, and solid bulk other than coal. The predictive variables (features) considered were cabotage and transshipment. It is concluded that the decision tree model, in its current configuration, shows limited performance in classifying cargo type when using only these features.
Unlike other studies conducted in Colombia or the region—which focus mainly on logistics optimization, terminal management, or port efficiency analysis through quantitative indicators— this research incorporates an artificial intelligence and machine learning approach. The use of the CART methodology represents a methodological innovation, as it enables the identification of port cargo classification patterns based on categorical and supervised variables, offering a more predictive rather than descriptive perspective on the behavior of national maritime traffic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, Y., et al. (2022). Sustainable practices in port management: A review. Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(3), 45–58.

Chen, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). Optimization of port infrastructure: A case study of major ports in Asia. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 25(3), 198–212.

Fancello, G., Vitiello, D. M., & Serra, P. (2022). The impact of globalization on Mediterranean container terminals. International Maritime Transport and Logistics Conference, 11(1), 86–95.

García, A., & López, M. (2021). Digital transformation in port management: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Digital Innovation in Port Management, 8(2), 120–135.

García, A., & López, M. (2022). Cloud-based terminal operating systems: A review of current trends. International Journal of Port Management, 9(1), 45–58.

Gesé Bordils, M., González-Cancelas, N., & Molina Serrano, B. (2021). Indicadores clave de rendimiento en terminales de contenedores y su relación con la sostenibilidad ambiental: Aplicación al sistema portuario español. Ingeniare. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 29(4), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33052021000400647

Jones, R., & Wang, Q. (2019). The role of digitalization in port operations: A case study of major ports in Asia. Journal of Maritime Studies, 25(4), 321–335.

Jones, R., et al. (2020). Improving land connectivity in port development: Lessons from case studies. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(2), 120–135.

Li, H., & Wu, X. (2023). Sustainable practices in port management: A comparative analysis. Journal of Sustainable Development, 16(2), 89–102.

Sarduy Domínguez, Y. (2007). El análisis de información y las investigaciones cuantitativa y cualitativa. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 33(3).

Smith, P., & Wang, Q. (2018). Automation in port operations: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Automation in Transportation, 12(4), 321–335.

Smith, P. (2020). Green infrastructure in port development: A comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 28(1), 56–68.

Tan, L., et al. (2021). Promoting sustainable port development through renewable energy: A case study of major ports in Europe. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 30(3), 212–225.

Tan, L., et al. (2023). Intermodal connectivity in port development: Lessons from case studies. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(3), 212–225.

Wu, X., et al. (2021). Sustainable port development: Best practices and future directions. Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(4), 89–102.

Zhang, L. (2020). Empirical study on improving international dry port competitiveness based on logistics

supply chain integration: Evidence from China. International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(3), 1040–1068. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2020-0256

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)