Una propuesta metodológica para la gestión integral de los puertos marítimos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2019v17n30.5822Palabras clave:
calidad, conectividad, criterios, logística, puertos, tiempoResumen
La globalización tiene su soporte en el intercambio internacional de mercancías, donde los puertos marítimos desarrollan un papel clave, por lo que la competitividad de los países está determinada por la capacidad que tengan estos nodos de la red mundial para satisfacer las exigencias de los diversos actores que demandan sus servicios.
Periódicamente se publican clasificaciones a nivel mundial sobre el desempeño de los puertos marítimos atendiendo a factores cuantitativos, dando menos importancia a otros criterios que los actores de la cadena logística portuaria valoran para su calificación. A este respecto, en el presente trabajo de investigación se presenta un modelo integral de evaluación con ocho criterios, siguiendo la metodología multicriterio con la técnica de Thomas Saaty, con una ponderación de dominancia entre los criterios asignada por expertos del sector mediante una encuesta en línea.
Se aporta un ejemplo práctico con cinco puertos para demostrar que los mejores puertos combinan adecuadamente los diversos criterios para lograr la meta de prestar servicios de calidad, procurando que los buques y loS contenedores permanezcan el menor tiempo posible en sus instalaciones
Descargas
Referencias
Arduino, G., Aronietis, R., Croze, Y., Frouws, K., Ferrari, C., Guihéry, L., ... Vanelslander, T. (2013). How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation. Research in Transportation Economics, 42, 97-107. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.002
Bergqvist , R., & Zandén, N. E. (2012). Green port dues — The case of hinterland transport. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 85-91. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.002
Button, K., Chin, A., & Kramberger, T. (2015). Incorporating subjective elements into liners’seaport choice assessments. Transport Policy, 44, 125-133. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.07.006
Cepolina, S., & Ghiara, H. (2013). New trends in port strategies. Emerging role for ICT infrastructures. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 195-205. doi:10.1016/j. rtbm.2013.07.001
Chang , C. C., & Wang, C. M. (2012). Evaluating the effects of green port policy: Case study of Kaohsiung harbor in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D, 17, 185-189. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2011.11.006
Chun, Y., Wua, J., & Goh, M. (2010). Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets. Transportation Research Part E, 46, 1030-1042. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2010.01.002
Clark, X., Dollar, D., & Micco, A. (2004). Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade. Journal of Development Economics, 75, 417-450. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.005
De Langen, P. W., & Sharypova, K. (2013). Intermodal connectivity as a port performance indicator. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 97-102. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.003
De Martino, M., Errichiello, L., Marasco, A., & Morvillo, A. (2013). Logistics innovation in Seaports: An inter-organizational perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 123-133. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.05.001
Dong, Q., & Saaty, T. (septiembre de 2014). An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(3), 362-374.
Dooms , M., Van der Lugt, L., & De Langen, P. W. (2013). International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of Rotterdam Authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 148-157. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.004
Dunford, M., & Yeung, G. (2009). Port-Industrial Complexes. Elsevier Ltd., 285-294. doi:10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00858-0
Figueiredo, G., & Pierre, C. (2015). The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency. Transportation Research Part A 78, 124-133. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.034
Funke, M., & Yu, H. (2011). The emergence and spatial distribution of Chinese seaport cities. China Economic Review, 22(2), 196-209. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2011.01.002
González Laxe, F. (2008). Port Governance: Main Trends. Revista de Economía Mundial, 18, 355-368. doi: WOS:000257680600027
González, M. N., Soler, F., & Camarero, A. (2013). Modelo de eficiencia de las terminales de contenedores del sistema portuario español. Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA, 14, 49 - 67. Recuperado el 4 de marzo de 2017, de: file:///C:/Users/LuisFernando/Downloads/Dialnet-ModeloDeEficienciaDeLasTerminales-DeContenedoresDel-4742939.pdf
Güner, S. (2015). Investigating infrastructure, superstructure, operating and financial efficiency in the management of Turkish seaports using data envelopment analysis. Transport Policy, 40, 36-48. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.02.006
Hales, D., Siu Lee, J., & Tae C, Y. (2016). The Balanced Theory of Port Competitiveness. Transportation Journal, 55(2), 168-189.doi:10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0168
Heaver, T. (2006). The evolution and challenges of port economics. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 11-41. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16002-3
Hollen, R., Van den Bosch, A., & Frans, V. (2015). Strategic levers of port authorities for industrial ecosystem development. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 17(1), 79-96. doi:10.1057/mel.2014.28
Hu, H., Wang, J., Jin, F., & Ding, N. (2015). Evolution of regional transport dominance in China 1910–2012. Journal Geography Science, 25(6), 723-738. doi:10.1007/s11442-015- 1198-3
Iannone, F. (2012). The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research Part A, 46, 1424-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.019
Jitendra K., P., & Ajay, P. (2012). Competitive maritime policies and strategic dimensions for commercial seaports in India. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62, 54-67. doi:10.1016/j. ocecoaman.2012.03.008
Klink , H. A., & Van den Berg, G. C. (98). Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 1-9. doi: SO966-6923 (97)00035-5
Lloyd’s List Intelligence (2017). Top 100 container port 2016. Linton Nightingale. Recuperado el 22 de marzo de 2017, de: https://www.lloydslist.com/ll/incoming/article506151.ece
Marlow, P., & Paixao, A. (2003). Measuring lean ports performance. International Journal of Transport Management, 1, 189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtm.2003.12.002
Matsushima, N., & Takauchi, K. (2014). Port privatization in an international oligopoly. Transportation Research Part B, 67, 382-397. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.010
Meidutė, I., Aranskisa, A., & Litvinenko, M. (2014). Consumer satisfaction with the quality of logistics services. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 330-340. doi: 10.1007/ s11442-015-1198-3
Moreno Jiménez, J. M. (2002). El proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP). Fundamentos, metodología y aplicaciones. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza. Recuperado el 3 de marzo de 2017, de: http://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~nbaloian/DSS-DCC/ExplicacionMetodoAHP(ve%20 rpaginas11-16).pdf
Musso, E., Ferrari, C., & Benacchio, M. (2006). Port Investment: Profitability, Economic, Impacti and Financing. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 171-218. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16008-4
Nightingale, L. (2016). Top 100 Container Ports 2016. Tampa: Lloyd’s List and Containerisation International.
Notteboom, T. (2007). Strategic Challenges to Container Ports in a Changing Market Environment. Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 29-52. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17002-X
Ozbas, B., Or, I., & Altiok, T. (2013). Comprehensive scenario analysis for mitigation of risks of the maritime traffic in the Strait of Istanbul. Journal Of Risk Research, 16(5), 541-561. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.726239
Pallis, A. A., & De Langen, P. W. (2010). Seaports and the structural implications of the economic crisis. Research in Transportation Economics, 27, 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.003
Panigrahi, J., & Pradhan, A. (2012). Competitive maritime policies and strategic dimensions for commercial seaports in India. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62, 54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.03.008
Park, J. y., & Yeo, G. t. (2012). An Evaluation of Greenness of major Korean ports: A Fuzzy Set Approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(1), 067-082. doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2012.04.004
Park, Y., & Medda, F. (2015). Hub Status and Indexation of Container Ports. The Asian Journal of Shiping and Logistics, 31(2). doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2015.06.005
Parola, F., & Maugeri, S. (2013). Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: Towards a research agenda. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 114-122. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.005
Ping Song , D., Lyons, A., Li, D., & Sharifi, H. (2016). Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 87, 75-96. doi: 10.1016/j. tre.2016.01.001
Pinto, M., Goldberg, D., Stupello, Bruno, B., & Haley, C. (2010). Regulation and price setting of pilotage services in Brazil. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 12(4), 430-442. doi: 10.1057/mel.2010.15
Rodriguez, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2012). Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind? Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.003
Saaty , T. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ IJSSci.2008.01759
Saaty, T. (5 de septiembre de 1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. doi: 10.1016/0377- 2217(90)90057-I
Saaty, T. (2000). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. En: M. Köksala, & S. Ziont, Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) (pp. 15-37). Ankara. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_2
Saaty, T. (December 2008). Who won the 2008 olympics? A multicriteria decision of measuring intangibles. Journal of systems science and systems engeering, 17(4), 473-486.
Saaty, T., Peniwati, K., & Shang, J. (octubre de 2007). The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story. Mathematical and Computer Modeliling, 46(7-8), 1041-1053.
Shi, X., Tao, D., & Voss, S. (2011). RFID Technology And Its Application To Port-Based Container Logistics. Journal Of Organizational Computing And Electronic Commmerce, 21(4), 322-347. doi: 10.1080/10919392.2011.614202
Shinohara, M. (2016). Characteristics of Japanese port policy: Strategic ports and policy dilemma. Research in Transportation Business & Management, xx-xx. doi: 10.1016/j. rtbm.2016.08.005
Song, L., & Van Geenhuizen, M. (2014). Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces. Transport Policy, 36, 173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.003
Soon, C., & Haur Lam, W. (2013). The growth of seaports in Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia for 2007-2011. Ocean & Coastal Management, 78, 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.03.007
Talley , W. K., Ng , M., & Marsillac, E. (2014). Port service chains and port performance evaluation. Transportation Research Part E, 69, 236-247. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.05.008
Talley, W. K. (2006). An Economic Theory Of The Port. Transportation Economics, 16, 43-65. doi:0.1016/S0739-8859(06)16003-5
Talley, W. K. (2006). Port Performance: An Economics Perspective. Transportation Economics, 17, 499-516. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859 (06)17022-5
Theys, C., Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., & De Langen, P. (2010). The economics behind the awarding of terminals in seaports: Towards a research agenda. Research in Transportation Economics, 37, 37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.006
Tien Fang, F. (2016). 50 years of transportation in Singapore : achievements and challenges. Singapur: Fwa Tien Fang, National University of Singapure. doi: 79.110.19.199
Tongzon, J. (1995). Determinants Of Port Performance And Efficiency. Transportation Researchs A. Police and Practice, 29 A(3), 245-252.
Tovar, B., & Rodríguez, H. (2015). Classifying Ports for Efficiency Benchmarking: A Review and a Frontier-based Clustering Approach. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 35(3), 378-400. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1016473
Ucan, E., & Nas, S. (2016). Analysing Istanbul Strait Maritime Pilot Capacity by Simulation Technique. Journal Of Navigation, 69(4), 815-827. doi:10.1017/S0373463315000909
UNCTAD (2016). REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2016. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD/RMT/2016, UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION.
Van der Lugt, L., Dooms, Michaël, M., & Parola, F. (2013). Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8,103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.005
Veldman, S., Garcia-Alonso, L., & Liu, M. (2015). Testing port choice models using physical and monetary data: a comparative case study for the Spanish container trades. 43, 495-508. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1099754
Wan, S., Min Lu, W., & Pao Wang, T. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 706-713. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.005
Wang, C., Ducruet, C., & Wang, W. (2015). Evolution, accessibility and dynamics of road networks in China from 1600 BC to 1900 AD. Jorunal Geographic Science, 25(4), 451-484. doi: 10.1007/s11442-015-1180-0
Wanga, Y., & Cullinane, K. (2014). Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 61, 152-163. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.007
Wilmsmeier, G., Hoffmann, J., & Sanchez, R. (2006). The Impact of Port Characteristics on International Maritime Transport Costs. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 117-140. doi: 10.1016/S0739- 8859(06)16006-0
Yun Peng, W., Zijian Guo, X. S., & Qi , Z. (2016). A stochastic seaport network retrofit management problem considering shipping routing design. Ocean & Coastal Management, 119, 169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.10.013
Zhang, M., & Pel, A. J. (2016). Synchromodal hinterland freight transport: Model study for the port of Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.007