Critical analysis of the debate between Kelsen and Pashukanis in the theory of law. A perspective on the structuring and functioning of legal system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1692-5726/sin_fundamento.23.2017.12391Keywords:
Kelsen, Pashukanis, Legal system, State, legal theory, theory of stateAbstract
The theory of Law acquired great importance during the twentieth century, due to the political, economic, and social changes of the time, so it was the subject of various debates and discussions with different approaches and points of view; However, despite their differences, most theories based their arguments on 3 main points: the nature, structure and function of the legal system. Although the different cultures and models proposed allowed for different interpretations of these axes, authors with contrasting perceptions of the nature and objective of Law stand out: E. Pashukanis and H. Kelsen.
Downloads
References
Acuerdo 01 de 1918 (Concejo de Bogotá). Por el cual se crea el fondo de los pobres y se prohíbe la mendicidad. 29 de enero de 1918
Kant. I. (2004) Reflexiones sobre filosofía moral (1a. ed.) editorial Sígueme S.A.U
Kelsen, H. (2005). Teoría pura del derecho: Introducción a la ciencia del derecho (4a. ed.) Editorial Unión Ltda.
Lenin. V, (1966) El Estado y la revolución (1a. ed.) Editorial progreso
Pashukanis. E. (1976) Teoría General del Derecho y el Marxismo (1a. ed.) Editorial la pulga
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sin Fundamento
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.