Hacia una reinterpretación de la responsabilidad social empresarial desde las fuentes del pensamiento judío: el concepto de tikún olam al interior de entornos corporativos

Authors

  • Daniel E. Florez Muñoz Docente Investigador de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad de Cartagena. Abogado, Universidad de Cartagena. Certificado en Estudios Afrolatinoamericanos, Universidad de Harvard (EEUU). Especialista en Método y Técnicas de Investigación Social, CLACSO-FLACSO. Magister en Derecho, Universidad de Cartagena. Director del Semillero de Investigación en Derechos Humanos y Justicia Transicional de la misma institución. Estudiante de la Maestría en Educación, Universidad Hebrea de Jerusalén (Israel). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-2850

Keywords:

Tikun olam, corporate social responsibility, Jewish thought, business ethics, sustainability, social justice

Abstract

This article explores the Jewish concept of tikun olam—literally, “repairing the world”—as a spiritual and normative foundation for rethinking corporate social responsibility (CSR) in contemporary organizational contexts. Drawing on a critical assessment of the ethical tensions inherent in global capitalism—evident in rising inequality, labor exploitation, and environmental degradation—it argues that dominant CSR frameworks are often insufficient, frequently reduced to marketing tools or reputational strategies devoid of deep ethical commitment. Through a hermeneutic and argumentative methodology, the study engages in a close reading of classical Jewish sources (Mishnah, Talmud, Maimonides), complemented by contemporary rabbinic and ethical interpretations, and articulates these with key categories from corporate ethics and business management. The article traces the historical and conceptual evolution of tikun olam, presenting it not as a utopian ideal but as a concrete principle of legal reform, moral responsibility, and social repair. In addition, it analyzes related Jewish principles— tzedakah (just giving), chesed (lovingkindness), bal tashchit (prohibition against needless destruction), derech eretz (civility), and arevut (mutual responsibility)—as the ethical infrastructure of a transformative CSR model. Five practical areas of application are proposed: ethical governance, social inclusion, ecological sustainability, stakeholder responsibility, and organizational spirituality. The article concludes that tikun olam provides not only a coherent ethical framework but also a spiritual horizon capable of reorienting corporate activity toward the common good and long-term human flourishing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barroso, C. (2008). Prácticas de RSE en Yucatán: ¿estrategia ética o mercadotecnia? Revista de Estudios Empresariales, (4), 15–27.

Berbel, J., Reyes, F., & Gómez, L. (2007). La responsabilidad social corporativa: Entre la ética y la reputación. Revista Iberoamericana de Gestión, 3(1), 45–59.

Bouckaert, L., & Zsolnai, L. (Eds.). (2011). The Palgrave Handbook of Spirituality and Business. Palgrave Macmillan.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/00076813(91)90005-G

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). (2017). Carbon majors report: 100 fossil fuel producers and climate change. https://cdn.cdp.net

Elizalde, J., & Roffler, C. (2014). La pobreza en el siglo XXI: exclusión y ética empresarial. Integritas: Revista de Ética, 3(1), 61–71.

Greenberg, I. (1988). The Jewish way: Living the holidays. Simon & Schuster.

Jacobs, J. (2007). There shall be no needy: Pursuing social justice through Jewish law and tradition. Jewish Lights Publishing.

Maimónides. (2015). Mishné Torá: Hiljot Matanot Aniyim. Editorial Moaj

OIT (Organización Internacional del Trabajo). (2022). Ganancias y pobreza: aspectos económicos del trabajo forzoso. https://www.ilo.org

Pava, M. L. (1998). Jewish ethics as dialogue: Using spiritual tradition to inform modern business values. Palgrave Macmillan.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

Sacks, J. (2007). To heal a fractured world: The ethics of responsibility. Schocken Books.

Scholem, G. (1974). Kabbalah. Keter Publishing House.

Talmud Bavli, Tratado Guitín 36b–37a. (2012). Edición y traducción al inglés por A. Steinsaltz, Koren Talmud Bavli. Koren Publishers Jerusalem.

Torá (2004) Edición en hebreo-español. The Jewish Publication Society Tanakh.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-04

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Florez Muñoz, D. E. (2024). Hacia una reinterpretación de la responsabilidad social empresarial desde las fuentes del pensamiento judío: el concepto de tikún olam al interior de entornos corporativos. Gerencia Libre, 11, 91-103. https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/gerencia_libre/article/view/12799

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)