Science and Disciplinarity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2016v12n1.23111Keywords:
Disciplinarity scientific, scientific method, philosophy, knowledgeAbstract
In the course of history of science had presented many times when its protagonists have left their legacy printed. Although the dynamism of science does not allow stagnation in time, each was impregnated with facts, realities, and situations that should be analyzed from an analytical and unbiased look. This article presents one such analysis to define what is and is not science, and attempts to answer the question of what is science done for, all from a vision of scientific disciplinarity.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. ASIMOV, I. & CLARKE, A. The Roving Mind. New York: Prometheus Books, 1997.
2. BACON, F. Novum organum. London: Losada, 2004.
3. BAUER, H. Science literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1992.
4. BUNGE, M. La ciencia, su método y su filosofía. Barcelona: Laetoli, 2013.
5. BUNGE, M. La investigación científica: su estrategia y su filosofía. Ma- drid: Siglo XXI, 2000.
6. BUNGE, M. Seudociencia e ideología. Buenos Aires: Alianza, 1985.
7. BUTLER, J. et al. The power of religion in the public sphere. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
8. CAMP, J. Confusion: A study in the theory of knowledge. Massachuse- tts: Harvard University Press, 2002.
9. CASTELLS, M. The rise of the network society - The information age: Economy, society, and culture. USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
10. DESCARTES, R. Le discours de la methode. Translator Donald, A.C. (1998). Discourse on method. London: Hackett Publishing Company, 1637.
11. ENDERS, J. & FULTON, O. Higher education in a globalising world - International trends and mutual observations. Berlin: Springer, 2002.
12. FEYERABEND, P. Against Method. New York: Verso, 2010.
13. GASTON, J. Originality and competition in science: A study of the Bri- tish high energy physics community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
14. HABERMAS, J. Knowledge & human interests. London: Beacon Press, 1972.
15. HABERMAS, J. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lec- tures. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1990.
16. HAGSTROM, W. Competition in science. En: American Sociological Review, 1974. vol. 39, no. 1, p. 1-18,.
17. HARGROVES, K. & SMITH, M. The natural advantage of nations - Bu- siness opportunities, innovations and governance in the 21st century. London: Routledge, 2006.
18. HEAD, T. Conversations with Carl Sagan. Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi Press, 2006.
19. KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1996.
20. LAMB, D. & EASTON, S. Multiple discovery: The pattern of scientific progress. USA: Avebury, 1984.
21. LAYTON, E. Conditions of technological development. In Rösing, I. & Solla, D. (Eds.), Price Science, Technology, and Society: A Cross-Disci- plinary Perspective (p. 197-222). London: Sage, 1977.
22. LECLERC, G. Histoire naturelle - Générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roi. Paris: The L’imprimerie Royale, 1749.
23. LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. The raw and the cooked. Mythologiques, Volume 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
24. MORIN, E. Eduquer a l’heure planetaire. Paris: Balland, 2003.
25. MORIN, E. From the concept of system to the paradigm of comple- xity. En: Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 1992. Vol.15, no. 4, p. 371-385.
26. MORIN, E. La transdisciplinariedad: Manifiesto. Barcelona: 7 saberes, 1996.
27. MORIN, E. On Complexity - Advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences. London: Hampton Press, 2008.
28. MULKAY, M. Knowledge and utility: Implications for the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 9, 1, p. 63-80, 1979.
29. OSORIO, S. El pensamiento complejo y la transdisciplinariedad: Fenó- menos emergentes de una nueva racionalidad. En: Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, 2012. vol. XX, no.1, p. 269-291.
30. PHELAN, S. What Is complexity science, really? En: Emergence, 2001. vol. 3, no. 1, p. 120-36.
31. PICKERING, A. The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
32. POPPER, K. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge, 2002.
33. PRYGONINE, I. From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. London: W.H. Freeman & Co, 1981.
34. PRYGONINE, I. Is Future given? London: World Scientific Pub Co Inc., 2003.
35. PRYGONINE, I. Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. London: Flamingo, 1984.
36. RAJ, K. Colonial encounters and the forging of new knowledge and national identities: Great Britain and India. En: MACLEOD, R. (Ed.), Nature and Empire: Science and the Colonial Enterprise (p. 119-134). London: Osiris, 2000.
37. SAGAN, C. The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark . New York: Ballantine Books, 1997.
38. SCHAAR, M. Judgement and Certainty. 26th International Wittgens- tein Symposium (p. 311-313). August 3-9, Kirchberg am Wechsel, Aus- tria, 2003.
39. SERNA, M.E. Editorial. En: Revista Digital Lámpsakos, 2010. vol. 3, p. 5-6.
40. SERNA, M.E. Social Control for Science and Technology. En: Larrondo, P. et al. (Eds.), 10th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (p. 1-7), 2012.
41. WESTFALL, R. The life of Isaac Newton. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
42. WILSON, E. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. London: Vintage, 1999.
2. BACON, F. Novum organum. London: Losada, 2004.
3. BAUER, H. Science literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1992.
4. BUNGE, M. La ciencia, su método y su filosofía. Barcelona: Laetoli, 2013.
5. BUNGE, M. La investigación científica: su estrategia y su filosofía. Ma- drid: Siglo XXI, 2000.
6. BUNGE, M. Seudociencia e ideología. Buenos Aires: Alianza, 1985.
7. BUTLER, J. et al. The power of religion in the public sphere. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
8. CAMP, J. Confusion: A study in the theory of knowledge. Massachuse- tts: Harvard University Press, 2002.
9. CASTELLS, M. The rise of the network society - The information age: Economy, society, and culture. USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
10. DESCARTES, R. Le discours de la methode. Translator Donald, A.C. (1998). Discourse on method. London: Hackett Publishing Company, 1637.
11. ENDERS, J. & FULTON, O. Higher education in a globalising world - International trends and mutual observations. Berlin: Springer, 2002.
12. FEYERABEND, P. Against Method. New York: Verso, 2010.
13. GASTON, J. Originality and competition in science: A study of the Bri- tish high energy physics community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
14. HABERMAS, J. Knowledge & human interests. London: Beacon Press, 1972.
15. HABERMAS, J. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lec- tures. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1990.
16. HAGSTROM, W. Competition in science. En: American Sociological Review, 1974. vol. 39, no. 1, p. 1-18,.
17. HARGROVES, K. & SMITH, M. The natural advantage of nations - Bu- siness opportunities, innovations and governance in the 21st century. London: Routledge, 2006.
18. HEAD, T. Conversations with Carl Sagan. Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi Press, 2006.
19. KUHN, T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1996.
20. LAMB, D. & EASTON, S. Multiple discovery: The pattern of scientific progress. USA: Avebury, 1984.
21. LAYTON, E. Conditions of technological development. In Rösing, I. & Solla, D. (Eds.), Price Science, Technology, and Society: A Cross-Disci- plinary Perspective (p. 197-222). London: Sage, 1977.
22. LECLERC, G. Histoire naturelle - Générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roi. Paris: The L’imprimerie Royale, 1749.
23. LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. The raw and the cooked. Mythologiques, Volume 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.
24. MORIN, E. Eduquer a l’heure planetaire. Paris: Balland, 2003.
25. MORIN, E. From the concept of system to the paradigm of comple- xity. En: Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 1992. Vol.15, no. 4, p. 371-385.
26. MORIN, E. La transdisciplinariedad: Manifiesto. Barcelona: 7 saberes, 1996.
27. MORIN, E. On Complexity - Advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences. London: Hampton Press, 2008.
28. MULKAY, M. Knowledge and utility: Implications for the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 9, 1, p. 63-80, 1979.
29. OSORIO, S. El pensamiento complejo y la transdisciplinariedad: Fenó- menos emergentes de una nueva racionalidad. En: Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, 2012. vol. XX, no.1, p. 269-291.
30. PHELAN, S. What Is complexity science, really? En: Emergence, 2001. vol. 3, no. 1, p. 120-36.
31. PICKERING, A. The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
32. POPPER, K. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge, 2002.
33. PRYGONINE, I. From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. London: W.H. Freeman & Co, 1981.
34. PRYGONINE, I. Is Future given? London: World Scientific Pub Co Inc., 2003.
35. PRYGONINE, I. Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. London: Flamingo, 1984.
36. RAJ, K. Colonial encounters and the forging of new knowledge and national identities: Great Britain and India. En: MACLEOD, R. (Ed.), Nature and Empire: Science and the Colonial Enterprise (p. 119-134). London: Osiris, 2000.
37. SAGAN, C. The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark . New York: Ballantine Books, 1997.
38. SCHAAR, M. Judgement and Certainty. 26th International Wittgens- tein Symposium (p. 311-313). August 3-9, Kirchberg am Wechsel, Aus- tria, 2003.
39. SERNA, M.E. Editorial. En: Revista Digital Lámpsakos, 2010. vol. 3, p. 5-6.
40. SERNA, M.E. Social Control for Science and Technology. En: Larrondo, P. et al. (Eds.), 10th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (p. 1-7), 2012.
41. WESTFALL, R. The life of Isaac Newton. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
42. WILSON, E. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. London: Vintage, 1999.
