Comparación de Kanban, CONWIP y Sistemas Híbridos Pull
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1909-2458/ingeniare.12.638Keywords:
Work in process (WIP), Constant work in process (CONWIP), Pull production systems, Push production systems, JIT production planning system, KanbanAbstract
This paper remarks the relevance of the simulations and the differences between the control production system CONWIP and Kanban in a production line. This paper focuses in different points of view of the control production system in goods production Industries which use Pull Systems as a support for a more thorough review of the article to be applied.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] L. Blanco, E. Romero y J. Paez, “CONWIP un sistema de control de producción, LACCET InternationalLatin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology”, (LACCET’2006), 2006.
[2] R. Marek, D. Elkins, D. Smith, “Understanding the fundamentals of kanban and CONWIP pull systems using simulation, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University 238 Zachry Engineering Center”, College Station, TX 77843-3 13 1, U.S.A., 2001.
[3] S.T. Enns y P. Rogers, “Clarifying CONWIP versus push system behavior using simulation, Dept. of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering”, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB., T2N- 1N4, Canada, 2008.
[4] Y. Khojasteh, “Developing a framework for performance analysis of a production process controlled by Kanban and CONWIP”, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2009.
[5] Khojasteh and Ghamari’s. “A performance comparison between Kanban and CONWIP controlled assembly systems”, J Intell Manuff, 2009.
[2] R. Marek, D. Elkins, D. Smith, “Understanding the fundamentals of kanban and CONWIP pull systems using simulation, Department of Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University 238 Zachry Engineering Center”, College Station, TX 77843-3 13 1, U.S.A., 2001.
[3] S.T. Enns y P. Rogers, “Clarifying CONWIP versus push system behavior using simulation, Dept. of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering”, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB., T2N- 1N4, Canada, 2008.
[4] Y. Khojasteh, “Developing a framework for performance analysis of a production process controlled by Kanban and CONWIP”, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2009.
[5] Khojasteh and Ghamari’s. “A performance comparison between Kanban and CONWIP controlled assembly systems”, J Intell Manuff, 2009.
Downloads
Published
2012-01-01
Issue
Section
Revisión de tema
How to Cite
1.
Caro H, Suero D, López J. Comparación de Kanban, CONWIP y Sistemas Híbridos Pull. ingeniare [Internet]. 2012 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Dec. 5];(12):99-105. Available from: https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/ingeniare/article/view/638
