GUIDELINES FOR THE AUTHORS

ENTRAMADO receives for publication research, reflection, and review articles resulting from completed scientific and technological research projects, in Spanish, English, and Portuguese, unpublished and original, which implies that they must not have been published in whole or in part, in another medium: journal or book, physical or electronic.

Frequency of publication: Continuous publication, with cuts in June and December. This magazine is published continuously: articles are uploaded individually as they are finished, without waiting for the complete issue.

Authors interested in submitting an article must register and then enter the journal's Editorial Management System in the Open Journal System (OJS) at the link https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/entramado/index and follow the instructions for a “New Submission”. When submitting an article, all authors must be registered using the option “Add collaborator”.  Manuscripts should be uploaded in Word format to OJS (upload the article file). Also, it is requested to attach (upload complementary files) the formats indicated below:

1. Completed article application form. Here

2. The author's resume format is filled out by each author. Here

3. Model document for guarantees and assignment of copyrights in favor of Revista Entramado. Here

4. Declaration of conflict of interest. Here

In order to preserve the inclusion of authors from different countries, the Journal may include a maximum of 10% of articles authored by Researchers, Faculty, and Students associated with the Universidad Libre de Colombia. Likewise, articles by authors or co-authors that appear in two or more manuscripts per edition will not be published, nor will articles by the same author or co-author be published in four consecutive editions. All articles will be submitted using the same evaluation process.

It is important to inform if the manuscript was derived from a: Student Work, Undergraduate Thesis: Master's thesis, or Ph.D. thesis. In case of having indicated any of the options, the appropriate information of the base source should be placed as a footnote within the article; likewise, the respective bibliographic reference should be presented.

In any case, Entramado will not accept articles whose content is greater than 10% of the source work—a master's or Doctoral Thesis—published in institutional repositories or other open-access media.

Typographical specifications

- File: Letter size
The minimum length of the article will be 16 pages and a maximum of 30 pages, including bibliography/ literature, cited, illustrations, graphs, tables, and annexes.
- Source: Arial 12 point.
- Spaced:
  - Single-spaced, left-aligned text, except in tables and figures.
  - Two spaces after the endpoint of a sentence
  - Margins: 2.5 centimeters on each side
If the work requires graphic material, figures,  illustrations, photographs, tables, charts, maps, etc., these must appear directly in the text with all the accompanying textual information (numbering, calls, figure captions, fonts, etc.), to indicate where in the text the material should be included. See section 5. Tables, figures, and illustrations.

The author is responsible for checking style and spelling before submission to the journal.

The order of sections of the article should follow a similar order to the following:

    1. Presentation page

    Title in English and Spanish: It should be concise, and precise but informative about the main content of the publication. Maximum 15 words.

    A brief review of each author:

    • Name: authors will be identified by their first name, the journal suggests that all authors choose a unique signature in IraLIS (register in IraLIS);
    • Institutional linkage: (refers to the institution that financed or supported the research. Contact addresses should be included: postal, telephone, e-mail, and web),
    • Contact information: City, country, institutional position, e-mail preferably institutional.
    • ORCID identifier, and for Colombian authors, updated link to CvLAC (basic electronic resume format used by Minciencias).
    • In the case of several authors, an author should be selected for correspondence, who is responsible for the submission of the manuscript and interlocutor between the authors and the journal, assertive and knowledgeable about the aspects of the research.

    Co-authorship. If the articles submitted to the journal are written by two or more authors, they must contain, at the end of the document, before the references, a text indicating the specific contribution of each one of them, according to the CRediT taxonomy. The editorial team expects that the authors have discussed, reviewed, and accepted each other's contributions to the paper (see taxonomy at https://credit.niso.org/). 

  2. When several authors or co-authors participate in the writing of the article, all those involved are requested to

    • Review and approve the order of appearance of all participants.
    • Review and approve the final version.
    • Review, validate, and approve the institutional affiliations.

    In the case of a request for addition, elimination, or reordering of authors, this must be made during the evaluation process, that is before the manuscript is accepted, and must be approved by the Editorial Committee, represented by the Editor.

    To request the modification, the following must be taken into consideration:

    • The author in charge or corresponding author must state and justify the reason or motive for the change in the list of authors or co-authors.
    • The author in charge or corresponding author must attach written confirmation via OJS message or email to the journal from all authors or co-authors approving the addition, deletion, or reordering (this includes confirmation of the author or co-author to be added or deleted).

    Only in some exceptional situations will the Editorial Board, represented by the editor, consider the addition, deletion, or rearrangement of an author or co-author after approval of the manuscript. During the case review process, the publication of the article will be suspended. In cases where the article has been published, any request approved by the Editorial Committee, represented by the editor, will be submitted as a correction.

    Sources of funding: All sources of funding granted for this study/research, as well as for the writing of the article, should be acknowledged, indicating concisely the funding agency - name of the institution - and project code or resolution (if applicable). If no funding was provided for the research, indicate it as follows: "This research did not receive specific funding from any entity in the private, public, commercial, or non-profit sectors".

    Availability of data. Authors should declare whether all the data necessary and sufficient for the understanding of the research are found in the article or if part of them are housed in databases, annexes, or complementary material of the article.

    Disclaimer. Authors must declare whether the expressions, opinions, or interpretations outlined in the article are a personal position or an official position of their institutions.

    Acknowledgments. In the acknowledgments, mention is made of persons who have made substantial contributions to the study, but who do not deserve the qualification of the author, and their written consent is obtained (for example: persons who helped in the collection of data, reviewed the text, gave their opinions, contributed bibliography and reviewed statistical data or graphs, among others).

    Abstract in Spanish and English (and, if possible, in Portuguese). It should be no longer than 180 words and should be structured as follows: introduction (I), methodology (M), results (R), and conclusion (C). The introduction about the subject presents the objective, the question or hypothesis, and justifies the study. The methodology presents the methods adopted, the participants, the variables, the instruments applied, and the analyses used. The results show the most important findings, and the conclusion states the implications, hypothesizes solutions, or possible explanations of the results. Quotations and equations should be avoided.

  3. For the summary of review articles, it is recommended to consider the following sections: Objective/question of interest, search strategy/sources selected, selection and exclusion criteria, selection of studies, period or stages covered by the review, synthesis of results, and conclusions.

    Keywords in Spanish and English.  Authors should propose 5 to 10 keywords that identify the article. Do not use phrases. The words must be standardized, i.e., recognized by databases. For this purpose, it is suggested to select them in thesauri.

2. Body of the article (the text should not be sent in two columns)

 - Original research papers

An unpublished document that presents, in a detailed and organized manner, the complete results of a completed original research. Originality is related to the communication of new knowledge. Unpublished refers to the fact that it has not been published or made known to a community by any means (printed or electronic). It presents the final results (not partial) in detail; that is, it provides enough information to be reproduced by other researchers. Organized information means that the document follows a logical presentation (it`s structured).

This type of article follows the following structure: abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusions (RIMRDyC).

Presentation page

Introduction. Gives an account of the background and objective of the research. A paragraph should be included that sets out the main theme/sections of the article.
Theoretical framework. It includes the bibliographic review that justifies the research, where the results of studies that validate the importance and need for the research work are commented on.
Methodology.  This is one of the most important sections of the article, presenting and justifying the set of rational procedures used to achieve the objective or series of objectives of the research. The authors should provide sufficient, detailed, and clear information so that others can replicate the study.  It should have the following sections: participants, instruments, and statistics.
Results. It presents the main results of the application of the methodology used in a comprehensible and necessary way to evaluate the validity of the research. They should be presented in the order in which the objectives were set. The authors are recommended to use tables and figures only when necessary and to be as technical as possible with the statistical terms to avoid misinterpretations.
Discussion. The style of the discussion should be argumentative and make judicious use of the polemic and debate by the author to convince the reader that the results have internal and external validity. It is suggested to discuss first the own and the most important results, then to compare the own results with those of other similar studies published, according to the bibliographic review. Information developed in previous sections should not be repeated.
Conclusions. They are connected with the purposes of the study established in the introduction, but they do not represent a summary of it. The conclusions must be presented as an answer to the question that originated the study and to the objectives set out, therefore, there must be as many conclusions as objectives. The recommendations and limitations of the article are highlighted and future lines of research are proposed.

Bibliographic references/ literature cited. These are constituted by a list of the data of each source consulted for the elaboration of the article. It includes articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, articles accepted for publication (in the process of printing/publication), book chapters, books, theses deposited in libraries, and documents published on the Internet. Primary sources should be cited, with wide coverage, both national and international, current (in use), and updated. Frequent self-citation or citation of works with no thematic relation or relevance to the study should be avoided.
This list allows you to identify and locate the sources to ensure the information contained allí́ or complements it if necessary. All authors cited in the body of a text or paper should match the list of bibliographic references listed at the end; never refer to an author who has not been cited in the text and vice-versa.
The list of bibliographical references at the end of the article (applies to research, reflection, and review articles) is made with 1.5 line spacing and should be organized according to the alphabetical order of the surnames of the authors of the sources. For the referencing of numbers or volumes of a publication, it is necessary to use Arabic and not Roman numbers.  

The standards to be used in the bibliographic references listed at the end of the article are based on the ICONTEC style for bibliography - see NTC 5613, NTC 4490 - 3 July 2008.  For online bibliographic references, the DOI of the articles and books should be included. The format is https://doi.org/10 . . and/or the download link. 

You can consult the information at the end of this section.

Annexes: In this optional section, you can place important material or secondary information that is too extensive. 

 - Reflection papers

A scientific or technical document that analyzes research results from an analytical, interpretative, and critical perspective. The reflection is focused on a specific issue, of interest and topicality. Although it is based on a particular (author) or collective (group of authors) position, it must be based on evidence, be argued, and presented in a clear and organized manner, in such a way that it achieves thematic mastery, solvency in the exposition of arguments and orientation to new ideas or perspectives. A reflection article is presented by a researcher with experience in the subject and who has focused on it for a large part of his or her research career. Their position must be well justified and have clear consequences that can be derived from their opinions.

For the body of the article, the following structure is suggested:

Presentation page

- Introduction: It should show the topic, background, theoretical concepts, gaps, justification, objective and methodology of the research. At the end, the main thread of the article should be presented.

    The General Topic: we talk in a general way about the topic that is the object of reflection, without deepening or exposing the academic judgments that will be developed in the rest of the article.
   Alternate positions: the social or theoretical conceptions that exist around the topic under reflection are expressed.
    Position to defend or objective of the work: the subjective reading that is tried to develop in the article is enunciated, or, the objective or objectives that are tried to develop in the document of reflection are outlined.

Reflection: this is the core part, it develops the researcher's point of view through an objective and critical analysis based on data or reliable sources and leads an argumentative thread towards new ideas or perspectives. It is a cohesive, unified, and coherent exposition of the ideas and arguments constructed as a result of a research and analysis process. The reflection is developed according to the outline.

                   Subtitle -------- opinions and arguments


Conclusions: the results and implications of the proposed research or reflection are presented and interpreted.

Bibliographic references/ literature cited. See the section of the research article.

NTC 5613, NTC 4490 - July 3, 2008. For online bibliographic references, the DOI of the articles, and books, should be included, the format is https://doi.org/10..... and/or the download link.

You must submit a bibliographic review of at least 40 - 50 references.

Attachments: Important material or secondary information that is too extensive is placed in this optional section.


  - Review papers

A scientific or technical document that compiles systematizes, and analyzes the published literature on a given topic to provide answers to specific problems (Cué Brugueras et al., 2008). Its strength lies in the critical analysis of the available literature, using systematic methods to arrive at results that can be replicated. This type of article reviews a higher proportion of references than the research article, a minimum of 50 references must be presented.

For the body of the article, the following structure is suggested:

Presentation page

- The introduction, where the objectives of the work are set, should state the need to address the question or questions to be answered (the topic to be reviewed).

- Methodology, which sets out how, with what criteria, and which papers have been selected and reviewed.
ENTRAMADO recommends applying the systematic review methodology of the Prisma statement. It also recommends reviewing the official publication of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The Prisma Statement or reviewing this version in Spanish: Listas guía de comprobación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: declaración Prisma.
     - Bibliographic search, selection criteria, information retrieval, documentary sources, and evaluation of the quality of the selected articles. Analysis of the variability, reliability, and validity of the articles.

- Development and discussion, the most outstanding details of the reviewed articles are presented (designs, biases, results, etc.), and, the discussed and argued synthesis of the results.

Organization and structuring of the data. Elaboration of the mind map. Combination of the results of different originals. Critical argumentation of the results (designs, biases, limitations, conclusions drawn).
- Conclusion, coherence based on the data and articles analyzed.
The consequences drawn from the review, proposals for new hypotheses, and specific lines of research for the future are presented. 

Bibliographical references/ literature cited. See the section of the research article.

NTC 5613, NTC 4490 - 3 July 2008. For the online bibliographic references, the DOI of the articles, and books must be included, the format is https://doi.org/10.... . and/or the download link.  

You must submit a bibliographic review of at least 50 references.

Annexes: In this optional section, important material or secondary information that is too extensive is placed. 

  - For case studies/case reports, the following structure is suggested: Only one case study per issue will be published.

Minciencias defines the case study/case report as a "document that presents the results of a study on a particular situation in order to publicize the technical and methodological experiences considered in a specific case. It includes a commented systematic review of the literature on analogous cases". The objective of including a case study is to provide tools of analysis on diverse situations of the regional, national, or global context, which generate discussion based on the questions that should be posed in each case.

- Introduction, should give an account of the background, objective, and methodology of the research. In the end, a paragraph should be included that sets out the main theme/sections of the article.
- Theoretical framework, which includes the bibliographic review that justifies the research, where the results of studies (other cases) that validate the relevance and need for the research work are commented on.
- A case study, includes a systematic review of a particular situation, where the technical and methodological experiences of the case under study are made known.
Final discussion or reflection, reflection, or comments arising from the review of the situation posed in the case study.
- Discussion questions, must include questions or exercises that are resolved from the review and/or reflection on the case under study.

For the online bibliographic references, the DOI of the articles, and books must be included, the format is https://doi.org/10.... . and/or the download link. 
3. Textual quotations. Corresponds to original material cited from another source. A short textual citation (less than 40 words) is incorporated into the text and enclosed in double quotes. Quotations longer than 40 words should be placed in a separate block, without quotes, with a smaller font size. In any case, the author, the year, and the specific page of the quoted text must always be added (Valencia, 2015, p. 20), and the complete reference must be included in the list of references. Citations must be faithful, that is, no modifications should be made to the text, even if the spelling is wrong. They should not be in underlined or italicized text and in cases where the author wishes to emphasize, he may add italicized text and then bracket the text ¿[italicized added]¿. Only the page number should be added in cases of textual quotations (including graphics and tables as well).

Style to present the bibliographical citations: for a work by the author they will be included in the body of the text, between parenthesis (last name, year of publication). If the author is part of the narrative, only the year of publication of the article is included in parentheses. When the date and surname are part of the sentence, they are not included in parentheses.

Examples of citing a work by an author in the text:
 - In research on social representations (Valencia, 2009) ...
- Valencia (2009) in his research on social representations ...
- In 2009, Valencia in its research on social representations ...

Works with multiple authors. When a work has two authors, both should be cited each time the reference occurs in the text. When a work has three, four, or five authors, all authors are cited the first time the reference occurs in the text. In subsequent citations of the same work, the first author's surname is given, followed by the phrase et al. and the year of publication. When a job is composed of six or more authors, only the last name of the first author is cited, followed by the phrase et al. and the year of publication, from the first time it appears in the text (in the list of references, however, the last names of all authors are reported).              

Example for citing works with multiple authors in the text
- this dimension is related to the perception of a fair result taking into account the investment (Messick and Cook, 1983)
- Ambrose, Hess, Ganesan, Silveti, and Carr (2007) explain the main use of the concept of justice ... (first time cited in the text).
- Ambrose et al.(2007) propose to analyze the consumer's attitude ... (Next time mentioned in the text).

If different authors cite two or more works in the same reference, the surnames and respective years of publication are written separately by a semicolon within the same parenthesis.

Example
- The internationalization of companies is a topic that is widely accepted (Arias, 2004; Leonidou, 1995; McDougall, Shane, and Oviatt, 1994; O'Farrell and Wood, 1998).

4. Footnotes: The footnotes will show only explanatory information, consecutive, without graphics, figures, or tables, and not bibliographical.

5. Tables, figures, and illustrations: In the body of the text, all tables and figures must be mentioned before they are presented. Each of these categories will be numbered (continuous according to their appearance in the text Figure 1, Table 1), title, and source. Tables and figures should be included in the appropriate place in the body of the text and should be sent in a separate file in their original format (PowerPoint, Excel, etc.). For tables and figures that are copied and reproduced from other sources, you must add the page number from which they were taken. Tables and figures should be designed in grayscale or black and white. Images and photos should be sent in high definition.

6. Equations. Equations should be done only with an equation editor. All equations must be listed in order of appearance.

7. General aspects to consider: a) In the articles in Spanish and Portuguese, in all figures (text, figures, and tables), dots must be used as thousands and commas as decimal separators. In the articles in English, commas are used as thousands separators and dots as decimal separators. b) The articles must be written in the third person singular (impersonal), have adequate punctuation and writing, and not present spelling mistakes. The author is responsible for proofreading the article prior to its submission to the journal.

The style for bibliographic references/Literature cited and listed at the end of the body of the text - 

see NTC 5613, NTC 4490 - July 3, 2008

ICONTEC standards and guidelines for bibliographic references or sources of information  NTC 5613, and NTC 4490, July 2008

JOURNAL ARTICLE 

Author(s) of the article. Title of the article. In: Title of the periodical (underlined and followed by a colon). Date of publication, month, and year (the name of the full month). Volume number. Issue number. Pagination, initial and final number. DOI identifier and/or download link.

ADAMS, Renée; HEITOR Almeida; FERREIRA, Daniel. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. In: The Review of Financial Studies. 2005. vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1403-1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi030

GARCÍA-SOLARTE, Mónica; SALAS-ARBELÁEZ, Laura; OROZCO-ESCOBAR, Henry. The Impact of the Manager’s Gender on Organizational Performance: Analysis in SMEs. In: Lattice. vol. 16, no. 1. p. 12-26. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.6062

BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS 

Author. Title. Subtitle. Subordinated Responsibility (optional). Edition (if not the first). City: Editor, year of publication. Page. Accompanying material (optional). Series (optional). ISBN (optional)

AYRES, Frank. Cálculo. Traducido por Yelka María García. 4. ed. Bogotá: McGraw-Hill, 2001. 596 p. (Serie compendios Schaum; no. 12). ISBN 958-41-0131-5

SMITH, Gordon; PARR, Russell L. Market and cost approaches. In: Valuation of intellectual property and intangible assets. 3 ed. New York: Jhon Wiley, 2000. P. 175-214

IMPRENTA NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA. Diario Oficial No. 44084; 44093. Ley 594 de 2000 (julio 14): por medio de la cual se dicta la Ley General de Archivos y se dictan otras disposiciones. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia, 2000. 89 p.

CHAPTER OR PARTS OF THE BOOK WRITTEN BY AN AUTHOR OTHER THAN THE AUTHOR(S) OF THE BOOK 

 Chapter author(s). Chapter title. In: (underlined and followed by a colon), author(s) of the book (with a capital letter). Title of the book. The number of the edition is different from the first one. Imprint: place of publication, name of the publisher, year of publication. Chapter page.

VARGAS OLARTE, Carlos Eduardo. Sport as an Object of Study. In: RITTNER, Volkar. Models of Sport. Cali: SFBD, 2018. 580 p.

LEGAL STANDARDS 

Jurisdiction (country, department, or municipality, in fixed capitals). Ministry or responsible entity, (in fixed capitals). Designation and number of the legal norm. Date of the legal regulation (day, month, year). Name of the legal regulation, if available. Title of the publication in which it officially appears. Place of publication. Date of publication. Number. Page number.

COLOMBIA. CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC. Law 100. (23, December, 1993). By which the system of integral social security is created and other dispositions are dictated. Official Gazette. Bogotá, D.C., 1993. No. 41148. p. 1-168

COLOMBIA. MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Decree 2269 (November 16, 1993), organizing the system of standardization, certification, and metrology Bogotá D.C.: The Ministry,1993.18 p.

COLOMBIA. MINISTRY OF SOCIAL PROTECTION. Resolución 03997 (30, octubre, 1996). By which the activities and procedures for the development of promotion and prevention actions of the General System of Social Security in Health (SGSSS) are established. Bogotá: The Ministry, 1996. 16 p.

TECHNICAL STANDARDS

The entity was responsible. Title. Code of the standard (if not part of the title). Edition. Place of publication. Publisher. Year. Pagination.

COLOMBIAN INSTITUTE OF STANDARDIZATION AND CERTIFICATION. Quality Management Systems: Fundamentals and Vocabulary. NTC-ISO 9001. Bogotá D.C.: The Institute, 2005. 36 p.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. Documentation -Bibliographic References - Content, form, and Structure. ISO 690:1987. 2 ed. Geneve, Switzerland: ISO, 1987. 11 p.

SPANISH ASSOCIATION FOR STANDARDIZATION AND CERTIFICATION. General terms and their definitions regarding standardization and related activities. UNE 0-007-91. Madrid: AENOR, 1992.

THESIS AND GRADUATE WORK 

Author(s) of the thesis. Title of the thesis. Mention or degree to which it is opted. Place of publication. An academic institution where it is presented. Year of publication. Page number.

ROJAS, María Helena; ZAMORA, María de Jesús. Physiotherapeutic treatment of standing neck disorders. Physical Therapy degree work. Bogotá D.C.: National University of Colombia. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Physical Therapy, 1989. 158 p.

DOCUMENTARY REFERENCES FOR ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SOURCES NTC 4490

WORLD WIDE WEB CONSORTIUM. W3C’s Web Accessibility Initiative Holds Best Practices Training in Spain; Webmasters, Designers Meet in Madrid to Learn About Accessible Design. In: ProQuest [online database]. Web page in HTML version. New York: Business Wire, 2004. [cited January 2, 2005]. Available on the Internet: http://proquest.umi.com> p.1

IS RECOMMENDED WHEN PRESENTING BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES:

-Don't put a dot at the end of the dois and URLs, because that dot may not work when you click it.

-Do not put "y", "and", "et" or "&", etc., before the last author. For the robot of GS "y" could be an initial of the author (Yves, Yvonne, Yussef, Yuri, Yuta, Yasser...), and in any case that conjunction in the language that be is also unnecessary, and the unnecessary it is that to delete it.

-Not to separate neither surnames or names by means of commas, because it is not clear to the robot of GS which name is of which surname. The authors must be delimited by means of the semicolon ";", even the last one. For example, this should not be allowed, which we can still find in many journals: Gómez, J, Pérez, M, Rodríguez, L and Fernández A. It is the negligence of the editors that these authors appear like this, almost as anonymous.

-Not to reduce the first names to the initial, because nowadays with so many authors there are many ambiguities. Authors should be recorded with their full first names and with both surnames necessarily linked by a hyphen. Authors' names must be written in full everywhere: in the journal's summary, in the bibliographic reference "how to cite", on the first page of the article, and in page headers... The names of the authors are sacred.

-Do not include unnecessary information such as "Online", "Internet", "Available at", "Retrieved from", etc., since the URL or DOI is already evidencing the location of the cited document. As we have said before what is not useful must be deleted.

-Even so, do not include other useless information such as the date of consultation. There is no need to overload the references with this useless information. Both the author when writing the article and the editor when reviewing the text have had to check that the URL works. If we trust the veracity of the author's text, we also have to trust that he used that online reference. The date of the consultation is that of the magazine's publication, and it is unnecessary to put it in the references.

-Do not put et al. from the 2nd or 4th author (as recommended by some styles) because those authors who are going to be hidden under "et al." will not receive their citation and their index h will be lower. There is nothing to prevent putting the names of all the authors, except in extreme and unusual cases of, for example, more than a dozen, in which case there will be no other solution than to put et al. from any of them. Having many co-authors will be less serious for those hidden under et al.

-In the references section, when there are several references from the same author or institution, do not substitute one line from the second reference. For each reference, the author's or institution's name should be written. Think again about the automatic indexing of robots, how can they assign that authorship to authors if there is only one line?

-Many people get confused with abbreviated volume and number formats, for example, 7(4) or 7:4. They don't remember what corresponds to the volume and what corresponds to the number. Therefore, an explicit format such as v. 7, n. 4 is better. In addition, there are journals that have only volume or only numbers, and it must be clear what that is.

-Don't abbreviate the pagination. For example, do not write pp. 242-8, but pp. 242-248.

For more information, please send an email to: revista.entramado.cali@unilibre.edu.co