The Principle of Autonomy in Medical Care in Colombia and Peru

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/0121-3474/verbaiuris.48.9935

Keywords:

Doctor-patient relationship, Patient autonomy, Medical information, Medical ethics, Medical paternalism

Abstract

Issues about ethics and the principle of autonomy in the relationships between health professionals and patients are analyzed with a comprehensive view of the Peruvian and Colombian regulations and jurisprudence, in order to allow dialogue in relation to the responses given around health information. In addition to the above, an analysis is made of the phenomenon of the rights and duties of the parties involved in health care, traditionally focused on the patient but which must recognize the active participation of health professionals. Finally, it addresses the recognition of the principle of autonomy in the doctor-patient relationship as the fundamental axis of the doctor-user relationship, protected by legal systems as the basis of health protection as a fundamental right and as a social right.

Downloads

Author Biographies

  • César Alberto Correa Martínez, Universidad Santo Tomas

    Doctor in Law, Master in Public Law, Specialist in Medical Health Law and Lawyer from the Santo Tomás University and Junior Researcher from the Ministry of Science. Email: cesarcorrea@usta.edu.co; CvLAC: https://acortar.link/4UXYCl; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1242-4922; Google Scholar: https://acortar.link/7FZqGt

  • Marleny Natalia Malaver Rojas, Politécnico Grancolombiano

    Candidate for a PhD in Management Sciences from the Universidad del Rosario, Master in Management and Management, School of Administration. Lawyer. Currently a Research Professor at the School of Law and Government at the Grancolombiano Polytechnic University Institution and member of the Research Group "Law, Society and Business" of the School of Law and Government of the Grancolombiano Polytechnic. CvLAC: https://acortar.link/JPHrms; Google Scholar: https://acortar.link/kKlFYR; ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-9913; Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marleny_Rojas; Email: mmalaver@poligran.edu.co

  • Jorge Ricardo Palomares García

    Lawyer from the Santo Tomás University, Legum Magister from the Universität Konstanz, candidate for a Doctor of Law from the Universität Konstanz. Professor and researcher at the Universidad Libre-Bogotá and member of the Observatory for Constitutional Citizen Intervention of the U. Libre-Bogotá. Senior researcher at Minciencias CvLAC: https://acortar.link/6MFzof; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-7523; Google Scholar: https://acortar.link/Y65BQi; email: jorger.palomaresg@unilibre.edu.co

  • Milton Ebert Quiroz Villalobos, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas

    Lawyer, Master in Constitutional Law from the Center for Political and Constitutional Studies of Spain, Master in Public Law, candidate for a Master in Constitutional Law and Human Rights and PhD student in the Advanced Studies Program in Human Rights. Professor and researcher at the Peruvian University of Applied Sciences-UPC. Google Scholar: https://acortar.link/zpAM9T; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-9396; CvLAC: https://acortar.link/cgpGSC

  • Lina Victoria Parra Cortés, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar

    Lawyer, Specialist Universidad del Rosario, Master in Law Mention Constitutional Law, Master in Advanced Studies in Human Rights and Doctor in Advanced Studies in Human Rights. Professor at the Simón Bolívar Andean University of Ecuador. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-5796; Google Scholar: https://acortar.link/QgkqBE; CvLAC: https://acortar.link/i1SY43

  • María Margarita Tirado Álvarez, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

    Lawyer, Magister in Criminal and Criminological Sciences, candidate for Doctor of Law from the University of Buenos Aires. Research professor Member of the RESCYPP research group of the Faculty of Law of the same institution. Email: maria.tirado@unimilitar.edu.co CvLAC: https://acortar.link/vcKkry; Google Scholar https://acortar.link/aR2jJz; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-981X

References

Alemany García, M. (2005). El concepto y la justificación del paternalismo [tesis doctoral]. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.

Álvarez-López, R. (2006). La información y el consentimiento: la nueva dimensión de la medicina actual. Angiología, 58(3), 179-191.

Arendt, Hannah (1963), Eichmann en Jerusalén, Debolsillo, Barcelona, 2008

Arendt, H., & Beiner, R. (2003). Conferencias sobre la filosofía política de Kant (p. 123). Barcelona: Paidós

Arrieta Valero, I. (2016). Autonomía del paciente: una propuesta contextual y multidimensional de la autonomía en ética asistencial. [tesis doctoral] Universidad de San Sebastián:

Celedón, C. (2016). Relación médico paciente. Revista de otorrinolaringología y cirugía de cabeza y cuello, 76(1), 51-54.

Del Perú, C. M. (2007). Código de ética y deontología.

Martínez, C. A. C. (2013). Límites al derecho de acceso a la información clínica en los casos de estado necesidad terapéutica y anotaciones subjetivas. Especial referencia al sistema español. Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi, 8(2), 33-52.

Gutiérrez Laboy, R. (2011). El problema de la prohibición ética. problemática, revista internacional en Filosofía, 158-177.

Gutiérrez,L. R. (2011). El problema de la prohibición en la ética. Problemata: revista internacional de filosofia, 2(2), 158-177.

Juicio de Núremberg (Tribunal Internacional de Justicia de Núrember 20 de Agosto de 1947).

Mendoza, A. (2017). La relación médico paciente: consideraciones bioéticas. Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, 63(4), 555-564.

Merino, P. A.., & Coca, M. C. P. (2015). Las consecuencias del utilitarismo norteamericano: el estudio Tuskegee. In Historia Ilustrada de la Bioética (pp. 97-110).

Montaner, A. C. M. (2012). La relación con el paciente desde la perspectiva personalista. Saber comunicar, un imperativo ético. Cuadernos de Bioética, 23(3), 631-639.

Osuna, G. D. O. (2019). Secreto médico: ¿informar o callar? Revista Waxapa, 7(13), 31-34.

Parra, D. (2013). La obligación de informar al paciente: Cuestiones sobre el derecho a ser informado. Revista médica de Chile, 141(12), 1578-1583.

Pizarro, C. (2018). Actualidad del deber de informar en Chile. Revista médica de Chile, 146(8), 909-912.

Santos Atherton, D. (2002). Relación médico - paciente. En Bioética general (manual moderno), 291-298).

Sentencia T 216, T 216-2008 (Corte Constitucional Colombiana).

Sentencia T 303, T- 303 de 2016 (Corte Constitucional Colombiana).

Sentencia SU 337, SU 337-1997 (Corte Constitucional Colombiana).

Sentencia del 5 de octubre del 2004, expediente No. O 2016-2004-AA/TC (Tribunal Constitucional del Perú).

Sewering, H. J. (2015). De Núremberg a Helsinki. En B. Herreros, & F. Bandés, Historia Ilustrada de la bioética, 89.

Silver, E. (1999). La información de los sistemas sanitarios y de los pacientes. Quark, 19-22.

Published

2022-06-01 — Updated on 2024-01-26

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Correa Martínez, C. A., Malaver Rojas, M. N., Palomares García, J. R., Quiroz Villalobos, M. E., Parra Cortés, L. V., & Tirado Álvarez, M. M. (2024). The Principle of Autonomy in Medical Care in Colombia and Peru. Verba Luris, 48, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.18041/0121-3474/verbaiuris.48.9935 (Original work published 2022)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)