Gestão das TIC ea qualidade da educação, medida pelos resultados de testes padronizados escolas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/libemp.v23n1.23107Palavras-chave:
Tecnologia estratégica, Gestão de TIC, qualidade da educação, avaliações escolares, educação, TICResumo
O objetivo mais importante da integração das TIC e da educação é melhorar a qualidade da educação, essa integração é percebido como uma inovação em instituições de ensino, devido às alterações que provoca na educação e comportamento seus atores. O objetivo deste trabalho foi estudar a influência da gestão das TIC sobre a qualidade do ensino, empregando um empírico, cruz, com uma análise de âmbito descritivo, correlacional e explicativa, utilizando dados transversais. Gestão TIC foi quantificada a partir de uma pesquisa que mediu a percepção desta gestão por professores em suas instituições educacionais oficiais em Cali, Colômbia; enquanto a qualidade foi medido pelos resultados obtidos pelos alunos no último ano do ensino secundário nessas instituições, teste padronizado no grau 11, que levou o estado em 2014. A análise empírica rendeu indicações de que o uso ensino das TIC, o conhecimento que os professores têm deles, a direção estratégica e gestão de recursos de TIC que realizam influenciar os resultados instituições de ensino de testes padronizados escolares. Conclui-se que a integração bem sucedida da educação e das TIC, dependerá da capacidade de gestão das TIC e este por sua vez capacidades de absorção, difusão de conhecimento e gestão das instituições de ensino.
Downloads
Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.
Referências
1. Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind. The Journal of Economic
History, 46(2): pp. 385-406.
2. Abramovitz, M. (1994). Catch-up and convergence in the postwar growth boom and after. in:
Baumol, Nelson y Wolff (Ed.) Convergence of Productivity. Cross-National Studies and Historical
Evidence, Oxford University Press, Ch.4.
3. Albaladejo, M. (2001). Determinants and Policies to Foster the Competitiveness of sme Clusters:
Evidence from Latin America. QEH Working Paper Series-QEHWPS71, Working Paper Number
71.
4. Amoako-Gyampah K. and Salam A.F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model
in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41, pp. 731-745.
5. Ausubel, D.P.; Novak, J. D. y Hanessian, H. (1983). Psicología Educativa un punto de vista
cognoscitivo. México: Trillas. Reimpresión 2009. 621 Págs.
6. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy:
Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science 52: pp. 68-82.
7. Claro, M. (2010). Impacto de las TIC en los aprendizajes de los estudiantes. Estado del arte.
Coordinación Guillermo Sunkel y Daniela Trucco, División de Desarrollo Social de la Comisión
Moreno, et al.
162 Universidad Libre - Cali
Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Colección de documentos. CEPAL. http://
www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/7/40947/dp-impacto-tics-aprendizaje.pdf, consultado abril 2013.
8. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D.
The Economic Journal 99: pp. 569-596.
9. Cohen, W.; Levinthal, D. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and
Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152
10. Dahlman, C. and Nelson, R. (1993). Social Absorption Capability, National Innovation Systems and
Economic Development. Paper prepared for the UNU/INTECH Research Conference, Maastricht,
June 21-23.
11. Davidson E. (2006). A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and
Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 23-39.
12. Davis F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of
Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340.
13. Delone W.H., McLean E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of Information Systems
Success: a Ten-Year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), pp. 9-30.
14. Dosi, G. (1997). Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technical Change.
Economic Journal, n° 107, pp. 1530-1547.
15. Duchek S. (2013). Capturing Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Future Prospects. sbr 65
July 2013, 312-329. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
16. Fagerberg, J. (2003). Innovation: A guide to the literature. Paper presented at the Workshop: The
Many Guises of Innovation: What we have learn and where we are heading, Ottawa, October 23-
24.
17. Flor, M.L.; Oltra, M.J.; García, C. (2010). La relación entre la capacidad de absorción del
conocimiento externo y la estrategia empresarial: un análisis exploratorio. Universitat Jaume I.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 20, núm. 1 (2011), pp. 69-88. ISSN
1019-6838.
18. Frambach R.T. y Schillewaert N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level
framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research,
pp.163-176.
19. Gerschenkron, A. (1979). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: a Book of Essays.
Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20. Gómez, M. U. (2010). La importancia del Modelo Nacional de Gestión de Tecnología© en la
competitividad de las Organizaciones. Encuentro organizacional de gestión de tecnología e
innovación. Fundación Premio Nacional de Tecnología, México, D.F. Boletín electrónico. http://
pnt.org.mx/boletin/Marzo_2010.html Recuperado octubre 2 2013.
21. Hoang, H., F.T. Rothaermel. 2010. Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration,
exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal 31 734-758.
22. INDEC, SECYT y CEPAL (2003). Segunda encuesta nacional de innovación y conducta tecnológica
de las empresas argentinas 1998 - 2001, 1ª. ed., Buenos Aires.
Moreno, et al.
Vol. 12 No. 1, Enero - Junio de 2015 163
23. Jansen, J.J.P.; Van Den Bosch, F.A.J.; Volverda, H.W. (2005). Managing Potencial and Realized
Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizacional Antecedents Matter?, Academy of Management
Journal, 45, pp. 999-1015.
24. Jonassen, D.H. (2005). Modeling with Technology: Mindtools for Conceptual Change. Pearson,
3º Ed. University of Missouri.
25. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to Innovation. The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Harvard
Business School Press, EUA.
26. Lane, P. J.; Koka. B. G.; Pathak, S. (2006). The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical
Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. Academy of Management Review, 2006(31-4): pp.
833-863
27. Lazonick, W. (1993). Industry Clusters versus Global Webs: Organizational Capabilities in the
American Economy. en Edquist, C. y McKelvey, M. (Eds.) (2000), Systems of Innovation: Growth,
Competitiveness and Employment, pp. 323-346, Edwar Elgar, Great Britain.
28. Liao, J.L.; Welsch, H.; Stoica, M. (2003): Organizational Absorptive Capacity and Responsiveness:
An Empirical Investigation of Growth-Oriented SMEs, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28,
pp. 63-86.
29. Liu L. (2011). An Empirical Study on Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Enterprise. Profit and
Innovation Performance-Shandong Economic University, “Research on the impact of enterprise
network on its performance. Soft Science Program of Shandong Province, in Proceedings of the
8th International Conference on Innovation & Management. Kitakyushu, Japan.
30. Nieto, M. and Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge
Spillovers, and Innovative Effort, Technovation, 25, pp. 1141-1157.
31. OCDE, EUROSTAT. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation
Data, 3rd Edition. The Measurement of Scientific and TechnologicalActivities. OECD Publishing,
Paris. Editado en castellano por Grupo Tragsa.
32. OEI. (2010). 2021 Metas educativas la educación que queremos para la generación de los
bicentenarios. Naciones Unidas, Cepal, OEI, Secretaría General Iberoamericana. http://www.oei.
es/metas2021/libro.htm Recuperado mayo 15 2014.
33. Rogers, E.M. (2003), Diffusion of innovations, The Free Press, 5th ed. Nueva York.
34. Repenning N. (2002). A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation
Implementation. Organization Science, 13, 2, pp. 109-127.
35. Rothaermel, F.T. and Alexandre, M.T. (2009). Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The
Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Organization Science 20: pp. 759-780.
36. Schmidt, T. (2005). Absorptive Capacity – One Size fits all?. A firm-level analysis of Absorptive
Capacity for Different Kinds of Knowledge. Discussion Paper N° 05-72, ZEW.
37. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four
longitudinal field studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.
38. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information
technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), pp. 425-478.
39. Vigotsky, L. (2000). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: CríTica.
History, 46(2): pp. 385-406.
2. Abramovitz, M. (1994). Catch-up and convergence in the postwar growth boom and after. in:
Baumol, Nelson y Wolff (Ed.) Convergence of Productivity. Cross-National Studies and Historical
Evidence, Oxford University Press, Ch.4.
3. Albaladejo, M. (2001). Determinants and Policies to Foster the Competitiveness of sme Clusters:
Evidence from Latin America. QEH Working Paper Series-QEHWPS71, Working Paper Number
71.
4. Amoako-Gyampah K. and Salam A.F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model
in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41, pp. 731-745.
5. Ausubel, D.P.; Novak, J. D. y Hanessian, H. (1983). Psicología Educativa un punto de vista
cognoscitivo. México: Trillas. Reimpresión 2009. 621 Págs.
6. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy:
Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science 52: pp. 68-82.
7. Claro, M. (2010). Impacto de las TIC en los aprendizajes de los estudiantes. Estado del arte.
Coordinación Guillermo Sunkel y Daniela Trucco, División de Desarrollo Social de la Comisión
Moreno, et al.
162 Universidad Libre - Cali
Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Colección de documentos. CEPAL. http://
www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/7/40947/dp-impacto-tics-aprendizaje.pdf, consultado abril 2013.
8. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D.
The Economic Journal 99: pp. 569-596.
9. Cohen, W.; Levinthal, D. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and
Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152
10. Dahlman, C. and Nelson, R. (1993). Social Absorption Capability, National Innovation Systems and
Economic Development. Paper prepared for the UNU/INTECH Research Conference, Maastricht,
June 21-23.
11. Davidson E. (2006). A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and
Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 23-39.
12. Davis F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of
Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340.
13. Delone W.H., McLean E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of Information Systems
Success: a Ten-Year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), pp. 9-30.
14. Dosi, G. (1997). Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technical Change.
Economic Journal, n° 107, pp. 1530-1547.
15. Duchek S. (2013). Capturing Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Future Prospects. sbr 65
July 2013, 312-329. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
16. Fagerberg, J. (2003). Innovation: A guide to the literature. Paper presented at the Workshop: The
Many Guises of Innovation: What we have learn and where we are heading, Ottawa, October 23-
24.
17. Flor, M.L.; Oltra, M.J.; García, C. (2010). La relación entre la capacidad de absorción del
conocimiento externo y la estrategia empresarial: un análisis exploratorio. Universitat Jaume I.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 20, núm. 1 (2011), pp. 69-88. ISSN
1019-6838.
18. Frambach R.T. y Schillewaert N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level
framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research,
pp.163-176.
19. Gerschenkron, A. (1979). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: a Book of Essays.
Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20. Gómez, M. U. (2010). La importancia del Modelo Nacional de Gestión de Tecnología© en la
competitividad de las Organizaciones. Encuentro organizacional de gestión de tecnología e
innovación. Fundación Premio Nacional de Tecnología, México, D.F. Boletín electrónico. http://
pnt.org.mx/boletin/Marzo_2010.html Recuperado octubre 2 2013.
21. Hoang, H., F.T. Rothaermel. 2010. Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration,
exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal 31 734-758.
22. INDEC, SECYT y CEPAL (2003). Segunda encuesta nacional de innovación y conducta tecnológica
de las empresas argentinas 1998 - 2001, 1ª. ed., Buenos Aires.
Moreno, et al.
Vol. 12 No. 1, Enero - Junio de 2015 163
23. Jansen, J.J.P.; Van Den Bosch, F.A.J.; Volverda, H.W. (2005). Managing Potencial and Realized
Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizacional Antecedents Matter?, Academy of Management
Journal, 45, pp. 999-1015.
24. Jonassen, D.H. (2005). Modeling with Technology: Mindtools for Conceptual Change. Pearson,
3º Ed. University of Missouri.
25. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to Innovation. The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Harvard
Business School Press, EUA.
26. Lane, P. J.; Koka. B. G.; Pathak, S. (2006). The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical
Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. Academy of Management Review, 2006(31-4): pp.
833-863
27. Lazonick, W. (1993). Industry Clusters versus Global Webs: Organizational Capabilities in the
American Economy. en Edquist, C. y McKelvey, M. (Eds.) (2000), Systems of Innovation: Growth,
Competitiveness and Employment, pp. 323-346, Edwar Elgar, Great Britain.
28. Liao, J.L.; Welsch, H.; Stoica, M. (2003): Organizational Absorptive Capacity and Responsiveness:
An Empirical Investigation of Growth-Oriented SMEs, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28,
pp. 63-86.
29. Liu L. (2011). An Empirical Study on Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Enterprise. Profit and
Innovation Performance-Shandong Economic University, “Research on the impact of enterprise
network on its performance. Soft Science Program of Shandong Province, in Proceedings of the
8th International Conference on Innovation & Management. Kitakyushu, Japan.
30. Nieto, M. and Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge
Spillovers, and Innovative Effort, Technovation, 25, pp. 1141-1157.
31. OCDE, EUROSTAT. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation
Data, 3rd Edition. The Measurement of Scientific and TechnologicalActivities. OECD Publishing,
Paris. Editado en castellano por Grupo Tragsa.
32. OEI. (2010). 2021 Metas educativas la educación que queremos para la generación de los
bicentenarios. Naciones Unidas, Cepal, OEI, Secretaría General Iberoamericana. http://www.oei.
es/metas2021/libro.htm Recuperado mayo 15 2014.
33. Rogers, E.M. (2003), Diffusion of innovations, The Free Press, 5th ed. Nueva York.
34. Repenning N. (2002). A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation
Implementation. Organization Science, 13, 2, pp. 109-127.
35. Rothaermel, F.T. and Alexandre, M.T. (2009). Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The
Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Organization Science 20: pp. 759-780.
36. Schmidt, T. (2005). Absorptive Capacity – One Size fits all?. A firm-level analysis of Absorptive
Capacity for Different Kinds of Knowledge. Discussion Paper N° 05-72, ZEW.
37. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four
longitudinal field studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.
38. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information
technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), pp. 425-478.
39. Vigotsky, L. (2000). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: CríTica.
Downloads
Publicado
2015-01-01
Edição
Seção
Artículos
Como Citar
Gestão das TIC ea qualidade da educação, medida pelos resultados de testes padronizados escolas. (2015). Libre Empresa, 12(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.18041/libemp.v23n1.23107
