Herramientas de tamizaje de síntomas musculoesqueléticos relacionados con el trabajo: una revisión rápida de la literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2665-427X/ijeph.1.11397Palabras clave:
Tamizaje, Encuesta, Trabajador, Dolor musculoesquelético, Desorden OrtopédicoResumen
Antecedentes: Los trastornos musculoesqueléticos relacionados con el trabajo (TMERT) son un problema de salud pública y laboral, ya que aumentan los costos, el ausentismo y la pérdida de productividad. Identificar los factores de riesgo laborales para el desarrollo de TMERT a través de herramientas de detección es esencial para determinar y tratar preventivamente a los pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio es sintetizar y evaluar las herramientas de detección disponibles para los TMERT en la población trabajadora.
Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica rápida y exhaustiva mediante una búsqueda estructurada. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: 1) herramientas de detección para trastornos musculoesqueléticos, 2) estudios que presentaran resultados analíticos como descripciones de proporciones, sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y valor predictivo negativo, y 3) artículos centrados en la población trabajadora.
Resultados: Se identificaron un total de 4,584 artículos, con un recuento final de 8 artículos incluidos en la revisión. Las herramientas de detección identificadas abarcaron diversos aspectos, incluidos factores relacionados con el trabajo, elementos psicosociales y el entorno laboral. Este enfoque inclusivo permite predecir los TMERT en sitios musculoesqueléticos específicos, facilitando la categorización de los trabajadores según su riesgo de desarrollar TMERT y la necesidad de consulta médica respecto a sus síntomas.
Conclusión: El reconocimiento del impacto societal e industrial más amplio de los TMERT aumenta la importancia de avanzar en las metodologías de detección para abordar este problema de salud.
Descargas
Referencias
1. Kuhlmann E, Falkenbach M, Brînzac M, Correia T, Panagioti M, Ungureanu M. The mental health needs of healthcare workers: When evidence does not guide policy. A comparative assessment of selected European countries. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024; 39(3):614-636. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3752.
2. Lindegård A, Larsman P, Hadzibajramovic E, Ahlborg G. The influence of perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain on work performance and work ability in Swedish health care workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014; 87(4): 373-9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0875-8
3. Argus M, Paasuke M. Musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among office workers in an activity-based work environment. Internat J Occupat Saf Ergonom. 2022; 28(4): 2419-25. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1999616.
4. Muthelo L, Sinyegwe NF, Phukubye TA, Mbombi MO, Ntho TA, Mothiba TM. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and its effects amongst nurses in the selected intellectual disability unit of the Limpopo Province. Healthcare. 2023; 11(5): 777. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050777.
5. Piedrahita H. Costs of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in developing countries: Colombia case. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2006; 12(4): 379-86. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2006.11076696.
6. Cavallari JM, Ahuja M, Dugan AG, Meyer JD, Simcox N, Wakai S, et al. Differences in the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among female and male custodians. Am J Ind Med. 2016; 59(10): 841-52. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22626.
7. Munhall CC, Gudipudi R, Nguyen SA, Halstead LA. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents. Am J Otolaryngol. 2024; 45(1): 104070. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104070.
8. Teixeira EJS, Petersen Rd S, Marziale MHP. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and work instability of nursing professionals. Rev Bras Med Trabal. 2022;20(02):206-14. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-677.
9. Cheung K, Szeto G, Lai G, Ching S. Prevalence of and factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in nursing assistants working in nursing homes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(2): 265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020265.
10. Magalhães LMCA, Silva Costa KT da, Capistrano GN, Leal MD, de Andrade FB. A study on occupational health and safety. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1): 2186. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14584-w.
11. Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, King VJ, Hamel C, Kamel C, et al. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 130: 13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007.
12. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(1): 210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
14. Areerak K, van der Beek AJ, Janwantanakul P. A health behavior screening tool for non‐specific neck pain in office workers: a 1‐year prospective cohort study. J Occup Health. 2018; 60(5): 410-8. doi: 10.1539/joh.2018-0001-FS.
15. Janwantanakul P, Sihawong R, Sitthipornvorakul E, Paksaichol A. A screening tool for non-specific low back pain with disability in office workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16(1): 298. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0768-y.
16. Waongenngarm P, van der Beek AJ, Janwantanakul P, Akkarakittichoke N, Coenen P. Can the Borg CR-10 scale for neck and low back discomfort predict future neck and low back pain among high-risk office workers? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022; 95(9): 1881-9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-022-01883-3.
17. Baron S, Hales T, Hurrell J. Evaluation of symptom surveys for occupational musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6): 609-17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<609::AID-AJIM5>3.0.CO;2-E.
18. Descatha A, Roquelaure Y, Chastang JF, Evanoff B, Melchior M, Mariot C, et al. Validity of Nordic-style questionnaires in the surveillance of upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007; 33(1): 58-65. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1065.
19. Yazdanirad S, Pourtaghi G, Raei M, Ghasemi M. Development and validation of a tool for the comprehensive risk assessment of musculoskeletal disorders (CRAMUD) among employees of a steel industry. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2023; 24(3): 335-58. Doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2022.2086643
20. Rapicault C, Roquelaure Y, Bodin J, Fouquet N, Bertrais S. Development and validation of a work-related risk score for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in a French working population. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023; 49(8): 558-68. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4119.
21. Rujiret U, Keerin M, Julaporn P, Petcharatana B, Wattana J, Chutima J. Validity of “OfficeCheck”: A self-musculoskeletal assessment tool for screening work-related musculoskeletal disorders in office workers. Work. 2023; 76(4): 1501-8. • DOI: 10.3233/WOR-220491.
22. Nygaard NPB, Thomsen GF, Rasmussen J, Skadhauge LR, Gram B. Ergonomic and individual risk factors for musculoskeletal pain in the ageing workforce. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1): 1975. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14386-0.
23. Rodrigues MS, Leite RDV, Lelis CM, Chaves TC. Differences in ergonomic and workstation factors between computer office workers with and without reported musculoskeletal pain. Work. 2017; 57(4): 563-72. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172582.
24. Mekonnen TH, Yenealem DG, Geberu DM. Physical environmental and occupational factors inducing work-related neck and shoulder pains among self-employed tailors of informal sectors in Ethiopia, 2019: results from a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1): 1265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09351-8.
25. Daneshmandi H, Choobineh AR, Ghaem H, Alhamd M, Fakherpour A. The effect of musculoskeletal problems on fatigue and productivity of office personnel: a cross-sectional study. J Prev Med Hyg. 2017; 58(3): E252-8.
26. Sugano R, Ikegami K, Ando H, Nozawa H, Michii S, Kondo M, et al. The Relationship between fear-avoidance beliefs in employees with chronic musculoskeletal pain and work productivity: a longitudinal study. J UOEH. 2020; 42(1): 13-26. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.42.13.
27. Waehrer G, Leigh JP, Miller TR. Costs of occupational injury and illness within the health services sector. International Journal of Health Services. 2005; 35(2): 343-59. doi: 10.2190/RNQ3-0C13-U09M-TENP.
28. Haufler AJ, Feuerstein M, Huang GD. Job stress, upper extremity pain and functional limitations in symptomatic computer users. Am J Ind Med. 2000; 38(5): 507-15. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200011)38:5<507::aid-ajim3>3.0.co;2-5.
29. Cezar-Vaz MR, Xavier DM, Bonow CA, Vaz JC, Cardoso LS, Sant’Anna CF, et al. Musculoskeletal pain in the neck and lower back regions among PHC workers: association between workload, mental disorders, and strategies to manage pain. Healthcare. 2023; 11(3): 365. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030365.
30. Möckel L, Gerhard A, Mohr M, Armbrust CI, Möckel C. Prevalence of pain, analgesic self-medication and mental health in German pre-hospital emergency medical service personnel: a nationwide survey pilot-study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021; 94(8): 1975-82. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01730-x.
31. Núñez-Cortés R, Espin A, Calatayud J, Pérez-Alenda S, Cruz-Montecinos C, López-Bueno R, et al. Can vitality and mental health influence upper extremity pain? a prospective cohort study of 1185 female hospital nurses. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023; 13(10): 2192-201. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13100154.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/373b0/373b0f00d813ccf7fc504487c15ec69ff0089f4c" alt=""
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Interdisciplinary Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.