Biobancos para investigación Biomédica: Aspectos clave sobre consentimiento informado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2665-427X/ijeph.1.11807Palabras clave:
Biobancos, Consentimiento informado, investigación biomédicaDescargas
Referencias
1. Congreso de Colombia. Ley 2287 por medio de la cual se crea el sistema nacional de biobancos y se regula el funcionamiento de los biobancos con fines de investigación biomédica biotecnológica y epidemiológica y se dictan otras disposiciones. Congreso de Colombia: Bogota; 2023.
2. Serrano-Díaz N, Guío-Mahecha E, Páez-Leal MC. Consentimiento informado para Biobancos: Un debate abierto. Rev Univ Ind Santander Salud. 2016; 48(2): 246-256. doi:10.18273/revsal.v48n2-2016010
3. Shaw DM, Elger BS, Colledge F. What is a biobank? Differing definitions among biobank stakeholders. Clin Genet. 2014; 85(3): 223-227. doi: 10.1111/cge.12268.
4. Serepkaite J, Valuckiene Z, Gefenas E. “Mirroring” the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us? Sci Eng Ethics. 2014; 20(4):1079-1093. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0.
5. Chadwick R, Berg K. Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2(4): 318-321.
6. Knoppers BM, Chadwick R. Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6(1): 75-79.
7. Boulton M, Parker M. Informed consent in a changing environment. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(11): 2187-2198.
8. Miller T, Boulton M. Changing constructions of informed consent: qualitative research and complex social worlds. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(11): 2199–2211.
9. Wendler D. Broad versus blanket consent for research with human biological samples. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013; 43(5): 3-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.200.
10. Petrini C: ‘Broad’ consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70: 217–220. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.004.
11. Caulfield T, Kaye J. Broad consent in biobanking: reflections on seemingly insurmountable dilemmas. Med Law Int. 2009; 10: 85-100.
12. Whitley EA, Kanellopoulou N, Kaye J. Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15(5): 232-242. doi: 10.1159/000336544.
13. Steinsbekk KS, Kåre Myskja B, Solberg B. Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem? Eur J Hum Genet. 2013; 21(9): 897-902. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.282.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Interdisciplinary Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
