Atajos heurísticos en las decisiones políticas
PDF
PDF (English)
XML

Palabras clave

Heurística
Decisiones
Política
Sesgos
Prejuicios Heuristics
Decisions
Politics
Biases
Prejudices Heurística
Decisões
Política
Preconceitos

Cómo citar

Ensuncho Hoyos, C. F. (2022). Atajos heurísticos en las decisiones políticas. Entramado, 19(1), e–8730. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.8730

Resumen

Las ciencias cognitivas, en especial la psicología y la neurociencia social en los últimos años han ofrecido gracias a los avances investigativos del cerebro y a las técnicas no invasivas de neuroimagen métodos novedosos para comprender los mecanismos neurobiológicos subyacentes a la toma de decisiones. Por tanto, en este documento, se busca entender y comprender en qué medida los atajos heurísticos contribuyen a la toma de decisiones políticas, al contrastar los diferentes atajos mentales y sesgos cognitivos que asumen lo votantes a la hora de elegir candidatos o partidos políticos.

https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.1.8730
PDF
PDF (English)
XML

Citas

ANDERSON Craig A; LEPPER Mark R; ROSS Lee. Perseverance of social theories: the role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980. vol. 39, no. 6, p. 1037-1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077720

BACON Francis. Novum Organum: True Suggestions for the Interpretation of Nature. United States: Independently published. 2021. 346 p.

BANDUCCI, Susan A; KARP Jeffrey A; THRASHER Michael; RALLINGS Colin. Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections. In: Political Psychology. 2008. vol. 29, no. 6, p. 903-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00672.x

BERGGREN Niclas; JORDAHL Henrik; POUTVAARA, Panu. The looks of a winner: beauty and electoral success. In: Journal of Public Economics. 2010. vol. 94, no. 1-2, p. 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002

BRADSHAW Corey J A; EHRLICH Paul R; BEATTIE Andrew; CEBALLOS Gerardo; CRIST Eileen; DIAMOND Joan; DIRZO Rodolfo; EHRLICH Anne H; HARTE John; HARTE Mary Ellen; PYKE Graham; RAVEN Peter H; RIPPLE William J; SALTRÉ Frédérik; TURNBULL Christine; WACKERNAGEL Mathis y BLUMSTEIN Daniel T. Underestimating the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future. In: Frontiers in Conservation Science. 2021. vol. 1, p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419

DEJONCKHEERE Egon; RHEE Joshua J; BAGUMA Peter K; BARRY Oumar; BECKER Maja; BILEWICZ Michał; CASTELAIN Thomas; COSTANTINI Giulio; DIMDINS Girts; ESPINOSA Agustín; FINCHILESCU Gillian; FRIESE Malte; GASTARDO-CONACO Maria Cecilia; GÓMEZ Angel; GONZÁLEZ Roberto; GOTO Nobuhiko; HALAMA Peter; HURTADO-PARRADO Camilo; JIGA-BOY Gabriela M; KARL Johannes A; NOVAK Lindsay; AUSMEES Liisi; LOUGHNAN Steve; MASTOR Khairul A; MCLATCHIE Neil; ONYISHI Ike E; RIZWAN Muhammad; SCHALLER Mark; SERAFIMOVSKA Eleonora; SUH Eunkook M; SWANN William B; TONG Eddie M W; RHIANNON N Turner; Ana TORRES; VINOGRADOV Alexander; WANG Zhechen; WAI-LAN YEUNG Victoria; AMIOT Catherine E: BOONYASIRIWAT Watcharaporn; PEKER Müjde; VAN LANGE Paul A M; VAUCLAIR Christin-Melanie; KUPPENS Peter; BASTIAN Brock. Perceiving societal pressure to be happy is linked to poor well-being, especially in happy nations. En: Scientific Reports. 2022. vol. 12, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04262-z

FESTINGER Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Amsterdam: University Press. 1962. 291 p.

HARMON-JONES, Eddie. Cognitive Dissonance: Reexamining a Pivotal Theory in Psychology (2nd ed.). United States: American Psychological Association (APA). 2019. 303 p.

HASELTON, Martie G; NETTLE Daniel; MURRAY Damian R. The Evolution of Cognitive Bias En: The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. 2000. vol. 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118797914

HOLM Charles. (2015). The 25 Cognitive Biases: Uncovering The Myth Of Rational Thinking (English Edition). United States: Edición Kindle. 2015. 32 p.

KAHNEMAN Daniel. Pensar Rápido, Pensar Despacio. México: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial SA de CV. 2013. 672 p.

KANAI Ryota; FEILDEN Tom; FIRTH Colin; REES Geraint. Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. In: Current Biology. 2011. vol. 21, no. 8, p. 677-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.017

KAUFMANN Marc. Projection Bias in Effort Choices. In: AEA Randomized Controlled Trials. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4011-2.0

KORTELING J E Hans; TOET Alexander. Cognitive Biases. En: Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, 2nd edition. 2022. 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.24105-9

LAU Richard R; REDLAWSK David P. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. In: American Journal of Political Science. 2001. vol. 45, no. 4, p. 951. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334

LAUSTSEN Lasse. Decomposing the relationship between candidates’ facial appearance and electoral success. In: Political Behavior. 2014. vol. 36, no. 4, p. 777-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9253-1

LAUSTSEN Lasse; PETERSEN Michael Bang. Does a competent leader make a good friend? Conflict, ideology, and the psychologies of friendship and followership. In: Evolution and Human Behavior. 2015. vol. 36, no. 4, p. 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.001

LAUSTSEN Lasse; PETERSEN Michael Bang. When the party decides: the effects of facial competence and dominance on internal nominations of political candidates. In: Evolutionary Psychology. 2018. vol. 16, no. 2, p. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917732005

LAZARSFELD, Paul F. The election is over. En: Public Opinion Quarterly. 1944. vol. 8, no. 3, p. 317. Disponible en Internet: https://doi.org/10.1086/265692

LENZ Gabriel S; LAWSON Chappell. Looking the part: television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates’ appearance. En: American Journal of Political Science. 2011. vol. 55, no. 3, p. 574-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00511.x

LOEWENSTEIN George; O'DONOGHUE Ted; RABIN Matthew. Projection bias in predicting future utility. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2003. vol. 118, no. 4, p. 1209-1248. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552784

MANES Facundo; NIRO Mateo. El cerebro del futuro. Argentina: Editorial Planeta: 2018. 360 p.

MANES Facundo; NIRO Mateo. Ser humanos. Colombia: Editorial Planeta. 2021. 552 p.

MARKMAN Arthur B; MEDIN Douglas L. Decision making. En: PASHLER Hal y MEDIN Douglas. eds. Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology: memory and cognitive processes. 3a ed. New York: Wiley, 2002. p. 413-466.

MARSHALL James A R; TRIMMER Pete C; HOUSTON Alasdair I; McNAMARA John M. On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases. En: Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2013. vol. 28, no. 8, p. 469-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.013

OLIVOLA Christopher Y; TODOROV Alexander. Elected in 100 milliseconds: appearance-based trait inferences and voting. En: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 2010. vol. 34, no. 2, p. 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1

PARK J; KITAYAMA S. Individualism. En: Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. 2012, p. 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375000-6.00204-4

PETERS Uwe. What is the function of confirmation bias? In: Erkenntnis. 2022. Vol. 87, p. 1351-1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1

PETERSEN M B. Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases. In: Political Psychology. 2015. Vol. 36, p. 45-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12237

PHILLIPS Tom. Humanos: Una breve historia de cómo lo jodimos todo. México: Editorial Planeta Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. 2019. 256 p.

PINKER Steven. Racionalidad: Qué es, por qué escasea y cómo promoverla. México: Ediciones culturales Paidos S. A. 2021. 536 p.

RAMPELLO Silvia Marisa. Biases in decision making. En: Perspectivas. 2019. vol. 9, no. 1, p. 85-94. https://doi.org/10.19137/perspectivas-2019-v9n1a06

SCHOPENHAUER Arturo. El mundo como voluntad y representación. México: Editorial Porrúa S. A. 2009. 415 p.

SHAROT Tali. The optimism bias. En: Current Biology. 2011. vol. 21, no. 23, p. R941—R945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030

SHENKMAN Rick. Political Animals. United Kingdom: Hachette. 2016. 336 p.

SOROKA Stuart N; WLEZIEN Christopher. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy (1.a ed.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 254 p.

TANDETNIK, Caroline; SOHIER Elisa; CAPELLE Laurent; Du BOULLAY Viviane; OBADIA Michael; CHAMMAT Mariam; PYATIGORSKAIA Nadya; NACCACHE Lionel. Cognitive dissonance resolution depends on executive functions and frontal lobe integrity. In: Cortex. 2021. vol. 139, p. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.018

TAVRIS Carol; ARONSON Elliot. Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) Third Edition: Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts. United States: Mariner Books. 2020. 464 p.

TODOROV Alexander; MANDISODZA Anesu N; GOREN Amir; HALL Crystal. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. En: Science. 2005. Vol. 308, no. 5728, p. 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589

TVERSKY Amos; KAHNEMAN Daniel. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. In: Science. 1974. Vol. 185 no. 4157, p. 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

TVERSKY Amos; KAHNEMAN Daniel. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. In: Science. 1981. Vol. 211 no. 4481, p. 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

VANDENBOS Gary R. APA Dictionary of Psychology. United States: American Psychological Association. 2015. 1204 p.

WESTEN Drew. The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. United Kingdom: Public Affairs. 2008. 496 p.

ZARAGOZA Maria S; LANE Sean M. Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994. vol. 20, no. 4, p. 934-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934

ZHANG Yanchi; PAN Zhe; LI Kai; GUO Yongyu. Self-Serving bias in memories. In: Experimental Psychology. 2018. vol. 65, no. 4, p. 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000409

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2022 Entramado

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.