Nuevas tendencias en diseños de investigación & literatura sobre temas de innovación. Un enfoque metodológico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2619-4244/dl.34.11677Keywords:
Bibliographic portfolio, Innovation, Business ManagementAbstract
El presente estudio brinda una herramienta metodológica para preparar un portafolio bibliográfico en el ámbito de la innovación empresarial, no constituye una revisión de la literatura ni un reporte del estado del arte pertinentes. En su realización se indagó sobre los temas de innovación en 85 (ochenta y cinco) trabajos académicos publicados en 11 (once) revistas de libre acceso clasificadas en SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). Los resultados muestran la prevalencia de los estudios de naturaleza eminentemente cuantitativa (40% del total observado), aunque se observa que los estudios de naturaleza cualitativa y mixta (60%) son los que tienen un mayor peso en su conjunto (34% y 26% respectivamente), lo que demuestra la importancia del enfoque paradigmático cualitativo en los estudios recientes estudios publicados relativos a la innovación. Asimismo, el tipo de innovación de procesos es el más común en estos estudios (21%) dentro de 15 tipos definidos. En este sentido, esta obra sirve de referencia epistémica para emprender nuevos estudios sobre innovación, especialmente pensada para investigadores noveles, pero igualmente útil para aquellos investigadores experimentados que quieran profundizar en el tema de la innovación.
References
Akgun, A., Kıncal, C. & Pradhan, B. (2012). Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey). Environmental monitoring and assessment, 184(9), 5453-5470. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2352-8.
Autant, C., Chalaye, S., Manca, F., Moreno, R. & Suriñach, J. (2010). Measuring the adoption of innovation. A typology of EU countries based on the Innovation Survey. Innovation–The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(3), 199-222. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2010.547739.
Baregheh A, Rowley, J. & Sambrook S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578.
Bedoya-Villa, M. A., & Escobar-Sierra, M. (2018). Impact of employees’ attitudes and leader’s role on the innovation management linked to social responsibility. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 22 (2), 65-81. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/qip.v22i2.1121
Bornay, M., De la Rosa, D., López, A. & Valle, R. (2012). Employment relationships and firm innovation: the double role of human capital. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 223-240. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00735.x.
Brockman, B., Jones, M. & Becherer, R. (2012). Customer orientation and performance in small firms: Examining the moderating influence of risk‐taking, innovativeness, and opportunity focus. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(3), 429-446. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00361.x.
Butryumova, N., Karpycheva, S., Grisheva, K., & Kasyanova, E. (2015). Obstacles to small innovative companies’development: Case study of Nizhny Novgorod Region. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10 (4), 74-84. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000400008
Camagni, R. (2017). The city of business: The functional, the relational-cognitive and the hierarchical distributive approach. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21 (1), 31-48. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V21I1.818
Cepeda, G., Cegarra, J. G. & Jimenez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and information systems capability as catalysts. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 110-129. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00725.x.
Dabla, E., Brumby, J., Kyobe, A., Mills, Z. & Papageorgiou, C. (2012). Investing in public investment: an index of public investment efficiency. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(3), 235-266. doi: 10.1007/s10887-012-9078-5.
Dedehayir, O., & Seppänen, M. (2015). Birth and expansion of innovation ecosystems: A case study of copper production. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10 (2), 145-153.
De Almeida, M. F. L., De Moraes, C. A. C., & De Melo, M. A. C. (2015). Technology foresight on emerging technologies: Implications for a national innovation initiative in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10 (2), 183-197. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000200013
Dibrell, C., Craig, J. & Hansen, E. (2011). Natural environment, market orientation, and firm innovativeness: An organizational life cycle perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 467-489. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00333.x.
Dorčák, P., Štrach, P., & Pollák, F. (2015). Analytical view of the perception of selected innovative approaches in marketing communications. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19 (1), 74-84.
Dotzel, T., Shankar, V. & Berry, L. (2013). Service innovativeness and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 259-276. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0426.
Džupka, P., Klasová, S., & Kováč, V. (2016). Analysis of innovative start-up companies – case of Košice region. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 20 (1), 40-56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V20I1.641
Fadhil, R., Syamsul Maarif, M., Bantacut, T., & Hermawan, A. (2017). Assessment of innovation potential of gayo coffee agroindustry. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21 (3), 114-126. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V21I3.888
Farhana, M., & Bimenyimana, E. (2015). Design driven innovation as a differentiation strategy-in the context of automotive industry. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10 (2), 24-38. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000200003
Ferraresi, V., Nuzzo, C., Zoccali, C., Marandino, F., Vidiri, A., Salducca, N. & Biagini, R. (2010). Chordoma: clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of a case series of 25 patients. BMC cancer, 10(1), 22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-22.
Freeman, C. & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research policy, 38(4), 583-589. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.018.
Gómez-Valenzuela, V. (2015). Analysis of preference of incentives to innovation of Dominican manufacturing and service firms. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10(2), 93-116. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000200007
Hudec, O., & Prochádzková, M. (2015). Visegrad countries and regions: Innovation performance and efficiency. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19 (2), 55 72. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V19I2.593
Juk, Y. V., & Fuck, M. P. (2015). Innovations and support institutions: The 1st geographical indication in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10(2), 117-126. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000200008
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Innovation. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved May 6, 2020, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/innovation
Martínez, M. (2009a, 2009b). New paradigms in research. Caracas: Alfa Publishing.
Martínez, M. (2013). Science and art in the qualitative methodology. Mexico: Editorial Trillas.
Martovoy, A., Mention, A. -., & Torkkeli, M. (2015). Inbound open innovation in financial services. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation,10 (1), 117-131.
Majerník, M., Bosák, M., Štofová, L., & Szaryszová, P. (2015). Innovative model of integrated energy management in companies. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19 (1), 22-32. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V19I1.384
Michelino, F., Cammarano, A., Lamberti, E., & Caputo, M. (2015). Knowledge domains, technological strategies and open innovation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10 (2), 50-78. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000200005
Mochón, F., Mochón, M. & Sáez, M. (2014). Administración. Enfoque por competencias con casos latinoamericanos. México. Alfaomega
Paľová, D., Czaja, A., &Vejačka, M. (2018). Innovative approach to education improvement via enterprise-education collaboration. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 22 (3), 68-82. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V22I3.1171
Pinto, H., De Noronha, M. T., & Faustino, C. (2015). Knowledge and cooperation determinants of innovation networks: A mixed-methods approach to the case of Portugal. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation,10 (1), 83-102.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th edition. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Quandt, C., Bezerra, C. & Ferraresi, A. (2015). Dimensões da inovatividade organizacional e seu impacto no desempenho inovador: proposição e avaliação de um modelo. Gestão & Produção, 22(4), 873-886. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1568-14
Quandt, E. M., Gollihar, J., Blount, Z. D., Ellington, A. D., Georgiou, G. & Barrick, J. E. (2015). Fine-tuning citrate synthase flux potentiates and refines metabolic innovation in the Lenski evolution experiment. eLife, 4, e09696. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09696
Rubera, G. & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0494
Saá Pérez, P. & Díaz, N. (2010). HR management and innovation in an outermost region of the European Union. In Business Research Selection: 2008 call (p. 1.654 ). FYDE-Caja Canarias Foundation.
Sawang, S. & Unsworth, K. (2011). A model of organizational innovation implementation effectiveness in small to medium firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(05), 989-1011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003398.
Šoltés, M., & Štofa, T. (2016). Crowdfunding – the case of Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 20(2), 89-104. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V20I2.807
Spaček, M., & Vacík, E. (2016). Design of an innovative business model for mobile virtual network operators. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 20 (2), 69-88. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V20I2.772
Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Kimzan, H. & Sert, H. (2012). The impact of environmental uncertainty dimensions on organisational innovativeness: An empirical study on SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(02), 1250015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003647.
Vega-Jurado, J. M., Juliao-Esparragoza, D., Paternina-Arboleda, C.D., & Velez, M. C. (2015). Integrating technology, management and marketing innovation through open innovation models. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10 (4), 85-90. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000400009
Weeks, M. & Thomason, S. (2011). An exploratory assessment of the linkages between HRM practices, absorptive capacity, and innovation in outsourcing relationships. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(02), 303-334. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003179
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dictamen Libre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
