The Rural Family Economic Unit (Spanish acronym: UEFC)

general and dynamic theoretical conceptualization in the Colombian context

Authors

  • Jorge Alberto Rendón Vélez Universidad Libre

Keywords:

Peasant production, production method, explicit costs, implicit costs, social order, rural development, territory, rationality, economic dynamics

Abstract

The peasant production has been an objective of government policies during more than 5 decades. However, there is a great government ignorance concerning to dynamics and rationality of this productive sector. In this sense, there is a great difference between capitalistic production and peasant production. But, this matter has been ignored by the government, so that, the economical policies applied to peasant development has always failed. It is necessary to make new researches in order to get a better knowledge about peasant dynamic due to the present diagnosis is wrong. In the peasant production does not work the concept of earning and some expenses are not taken in to account. Besides, to improve the peasants life level implies to go further of economical aspects and it is necessary an integral vision, so that it is required to apply strategies directed to the development of the whole territory (countryside). Accordingly, the government policies, must take into account not only the economical matters, but some other elements as security, ways of communication and transport, public services, environment protection and strategies of social participation, association and organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Albán A. y Rendón J. Crecimiento, Desarrollo y Democracia en Colombia. Los contrapesos de un proceso incompleto. Universidad Libre, Cali. Impresora Feriva S.A. Cali, 2009.

2. Calva, J. Definición del concepto universal de Campesino, en “Los campesinos y su devenir en las economías de mercado”, edit. Siglo XXI, 1988.

3. Colmenares, G. Antecedentes sociales de la historia de la tierra en Colombia; los resguardos de la provincia de Tunja y su extinción. Revista Universidad Nacional, Número 4. Bogotá. Diciembre 1969.

4. Chayanov, A. La organización de la Unidad Económica Campesina. Editorial Nueva Visión. Buenos Aires, 1974.

5. Díaz, F. Historia documental de Colombia. Tunja, 1974.

6. Dickinson J.M y Mann, S. A.1978. Obstacles to the development of capitalist agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol 5. 1978.

7. Forero J. y Rudas G., Las economías campesinas y la formación del precio de los productos agrícolas. Cuadernos de Agroindustria y Economía Rural. Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá. 1984.

8. Kalmanovitz, S. Economía y Nación. Tercer Mundo Editores. Bogotá, 1994.

9. Moyano, E. y Sevilla E. Teodor Shanín: Naturaleza y lógica de la producción campesina. Anagrama. Barcelona, 1976.

10. Roldán, D. La pequeña propiedad parcelaria y la reproducción de la fuerza de trabajo campesina. Revista Estudios Rurales Latinoamericanos. Vol. 3 No.2. Editorial Presencia. Santafé de Bogotá, 1980.

11. Shetjman, A. Economía Campesina: especificidad, articulación y diferenciación, en Economía campesina y agricultura empresarial; Cap. II, Edit. Siglo XXI, México 1982.

12. Tirado, Á. Introducción a la historia económica colombiana. Áncora Editores. Bogotá 1988.

13. Wolpe, H. The theory of internal colonialism. The South Africa case. Departamento de Sociología. Universidad de Essex. Mimeo. Londres, 1977.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-01

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Rendón Vélez, J. A. (2012). The Rural Family Economic Unit (Spanish acronym: UEFC): general and dynamic theoretical conceptualization in the Colombian context. LIBRE EMPRESA, 9(2). https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/libreempresa/article/view/2981