Growing costs: free trade, industry location and environmental effects*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/libemp.2015.v12n2.24203Keywords:
Developing economies, industry location, free trade, environmental effectsAbstract
Despite the efforts of many developing economies to create national welfare by attracting foreign investors, industry location seems a key point to focus since industries should be placed in areas with low agglomeration to attract people to leave crowded cities and foster new environments with sustainability. Nowadays developing economies promote their industrial sectors to grow by providing supportive regulations, subsidies and credits, also they encourage foreign companies to invest in these countries, by creating labor force in marginal zones, where utilities and facilities are hardly found in the hope of raising its economy and making it sustainable. Agglomerations in large city raise costs for the local and national governmental institutions, because it creates a bench in wages, utility levels diminish and congestions costs arise. These are the reasons why countries encourage industrial sectors to move to smaller cities, with low government frictions in which population may find incentives in the short and long run, as low taxes, new infrastructure with new policies to make the economy grow. This document will explain the relationship between free trade affecting developing economies and how they promote the industry location in areas where people should be reallocated to create welfare and how these chain of events create an environmental impact.
Downloads
References
bbcswebdav/pid-524288-dt-content-rid-1497273_1/courses/2015_37_UGER402_65/
VII%20d.pdf
2. Bartik, T. J. (1988). The Effects of Environmental Regulation on Business Location in
the United States. Growth & Change, 19(3), 22.
3. Capaldo, J. (2014, October). Global Development and Environment Institute at Tufs
University. Retrieved from http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/policy_research/TTIP_simulations.html
4. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on
cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management journal,
43(4), 663-680.
5. Driesen, D. (n.d.). What is Free Trade: The Real Issue Lurking Behind the Trade and
Environment Debate. Syracuse University College of Law.
6. Darnall, N., & Edwards, D. (2006). Predicting the cost of environmental management
system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. StrateNoboa-Sánchez,
J.
48 Universidad Libre - Cali
gic management journal, 27(4), 301-320.
7. Duggal, S., & Simkonis, C. (2007). Offshore Outsourcing: New Spin or Same Old
Business? Northern Kentucky University.
8. Economia y Finanzas. (2014, November 26). Economia y Finanzas. Retrieved from
http://www.elblogsalmon.com/economia/tratado-de-libre-comercio-con-ee-uu-destruiria-600-mil-puestos-de-trabajo-en-europa
9. Economic Policy Institute. (2010). Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://
www.epi.org/
10. Frankel, J. (2008). Environmental Effects of International Trade.
11. Fujita M, K. P. (2001). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade.
(M. K. Fujita, Trans.) MIT press.
12. Harris, J. M. (2008, November 7). Trade and the environment. Retrieved from The
Encyclopedia of Earth: http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/156679/
13. Krugman, P. (1991). Geograpgy and Trade. MIT press.
14. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. The Journal of
Political Economy.
15. Lumina, C. (2008). Free Trade or Just Trade? The World Trade Organisation, Human
Rights and Development (Part 1). University of KwaZulu-Natal.
16. Melnik, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental
management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal
of Operations Management, 21(3), 329-351.
17. Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton &
Company Inc.
18. Stanford, H. (1985). Environmental Protection and Industrial Location. Annals Of
The Association Of American Geographers, 75(2), 227-240.
19. Wilsey, M., & Lichtig, S. (n.d.). Standford. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/
class/e297c/trade_environment/wheeling/hnike.html