The Ampersand Method in Problem Solving

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18041/2539-3669/gestionlibre.17.2024.11050

Keywords:

Method, Innovation, Education, Creativity, Processes, Ideas

Abstract

The objective of the work is to identify areas of opportunity and problems within a workgroup, organization, institution, or educational program through precise steps to generate ideas for creative solutions. The method used to develop the solution is the Bernd Löbach Method (1981), which is structured in four phases: phase 1: analysis of the problem, phase 2: solutions to the problem, phase 3: evaluation of the solutions to the problem and phase 4: realization of the solution to the problem. As a result, the design of a new method was obtained, which makes this tool available to users, with eight precise steps to obtain creative solutions to problems detected in specific contexts. This method is in the registration process before the Mexican Institute of Intellectual Property (IMPI). It will be available to the general public for its use and exploitation as knowledge generation. It is necessary to have an innovative method to guide the steps of the work team to follow a path toward probable solutions with certainty. Due to its theoretical and creative foundation, the Ampersand Method allows identifying and solving problems and areas of opportunity to have greater certainty. The work teams can have greater certainty in each step of the process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basadur, M. (1999). SIMPLEX. A Flight to Creativity, The Creative Education Foundation. Obtenido de https://morassociates.com/insight/jim-bruce/simplex-process-%E2%80%90-robust-creative-problem-solving-process

Birch, P., & Clegg, B. (2007). Instant Creativity. Londres: KOGAM.

Cardoso, R. (2014). Diseño para un mundo complejo (1.a ed.). México: ARS Optika Editores.

Claxton, B. (2016). Un modelo de diseño centrado en el usuario o ¡solo diseñe una caja negra!. Economía Creativa, 5, 7-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.46840/ec.2016.05.02

Esqueda, R., Rodríguez, L., Tapia, A., López-León., R., Tiburcio, C., de-la-Peña, A. M., Villalobos, S., Torres-Maya. R., & Riverra-Díaz, L. A.(2019). ¿Design thinking?: Una Discusión A Nueve Voces (1.a ed.). México: ARS Optika Editores.

IDEO. (2012). Design Thinking for Educators. Obtenido de https://designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/

Kimbell, L. & Jullier, J. (2012). The Social Design Methods Menu. Londres: Field Studio ltd. Obtenido de https://lucykimbell.com/stuff/Fieldstudio_SocialDesignMethodsMenu.pdf

LUMA Institute. (2012). Innovating for people Handbook of human-centered design Methods. Estados Unidos: LUMA Institute.

Löbach, B. (1981). Diseño industrial. Brasil: Edgard Blücher Ltda.

Ortiz J., Hernández I. & Peinado P. (2019). El modelo ecológico como herramienta para establecer el área de oportunidad en retos de diseño para la innovación social. En J. Ortiz, D. Alatorre (comp.), Innovación Social y Diseño (pp. 90-124). Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Pernice, K. (2013). Charettes (Design Sketching). Obtenido de https://nngroup.com/article/design-charettes/

Vilchis, L. C. (2000). Metodología Del Diseño : Fundamentos Teóricos. Centro Juan Acha, Investigación Sociológica en Arte Latinoamericano.

Published

2023-12-07 — Updated on 2024-09-03

Versions

How to Cite

Santana-Martínez , J. A., Romero-Vásquez, E. N., & Madrid-Moreno, O. A. (2024). The Ampersand Method in Problem Solving. Gestión Y Desarrollo Libre, 9(17). https://doi.org/10.18041/2539-3669/gestionlibre.17.2024.11050 (Original work published 2023)