Analysis of the regulatory and jurisprudential evolution of responsible labor because of the employer in colombia
Keywords:
Accident at work, Occupational illness, Job responsibility, Guilt employers, Warranty, PolicyAbstract
Th is scientifi c paper was performed in order to know what has been the position of our Honorable Supreme Court, Labour Court of Cassation regarding solidarity that must exist against payment of full compensation for damages in case of accidents will be referred to the relevant sentences issued by the High Court from the year 1994 to date, in relation to employees in mission accidents, considering that when Article 216 of the Labor Code, refers to the employer’s fault, guilt must be proven conclusively, it is referring to both the individual as a legal person or entity who has the status of employer, which, as the Court has said, “takes advantage of the actions of their subordinates and so they should bear the risks of the company which include facts arising from the misdirection of an agent”.
Downloads
References
Código Procesal Laboral. Edit. Leyer, 2008.
Código Sustantivo del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social. Edit. Leyer.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral. Radicación 42658 de febrero 28 de 1977.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, Sentencia 17429 febrero 19 de 1992. M.P. Germán Valdés
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Laboral. M.P. Eduardo López Villegas. Exp. No. 22175 Acta No. 12, Bogotá, D.C. 26 de febrero de 2004.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación laboral, Sentencia abril 10 de 1975.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, Sentencia de abril 8 de 1987. Decreto 1295 de 1994. Art. 9.
G.J., Tomo XLIII, Nº 1904, p. 69 (Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, Sec. Primera, Sent. Mayo 21/92. Rad. 4680. Con salvamento de voto.
GÓMEZ LIGUERRE, Carlos Ignacio. Solidaridad y Prevención, una refl exión sobre los efectos de la solidaridad entre los responsables de un daño. Localización Indret, Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, ISSN 1698-739 No. 3.
SENTENCIA del 8 de abril de 1988 (Rad. 0562)
