Acceso al órgano de solución de controversias de la OMC
Materias y sujetos
Keywords:
WTO, WTO dispute settlement organism, International trade disputes, GATT, GATSAbstract
This article analyzes the state access to dispute settlement system of the WTO, with especial attention to the situation of developing countries. As such, it seeks to place which subjects are accessing or not and what topics or subjects are entering to this system. In this regard, we note that countries that have access are the most developed. For its part, the issues that are known mainly refer to those of the GATT - 1994, the antidumping and agriculture, which shows that access in terms of matter is still strongly linked to trade in goods.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
ALLEE, T. (2004). Developing Countries and the Initiation of GATT/WTO, Disputes Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer
House Hilton, Chicago, documento en internet: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59883_index. html Consultado el 05-26 de 2009.
ALSTON, P. (2002). “Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann”, The Jean Monnet Programme, Jean Monnet Working Paper 12/02, New York, New York University School of Law, 2002, documento en internet: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2002.
AMARAL, D. (2007). “Pacificação do comércio internacional? A participação dos países em desenvolvimento nos contenciosos da OMC”, Rev. Jur., Brasília, Vol. 8, No. 83, fev./mar.
BRANDSTETTER, P. (2003). The participation of NGOs in the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Documento en internet: http://intlaw.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/int_beziehungen/Internetpubl/Brandstetter.pdf
BOHL, K. (2009). “Problems of developing country access to WTO dispute settlement”, Chicago-Kent Journal of International & Comparative Law, 130.
BOWN et al. (2005). “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing developing Country Cases: Engaging the private sector”, Paper presentado en la conferencia WTO dispute settlement and developing countries: use, implications, strategies, reforms, efectuada en Wisconsin University, Madison, 20-21 mayo 2005.
CATBAGAN, A. (2009). “Rights of action for private non-state actors in the WTO Dispute Settlement System”, Denver Journal of International Policy, Vol. 37.
EWART, A. (2007). “Small developing state in the WTO: A procedural approach to special and differential treatment through reforms to dispute settlement” en Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce. Vol. 35, No. 27.
FRANCKE, M. (2008). “Chile’s Participation in the Dispute Settlement System: Impact on Capacity Building”, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Inaugural Conference, Paper available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1159942
FIGUEROA, M. (2004). “Dinámicas de la nueva dimensión globalizada del régimen comercial multilateral: reconocimiento de nuevos sectores y participación de partes no estatales en el sistema OMC”, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, documento en internet: www.reei.org/reei8/PerezFigueroa_reei8_.pdf
GRANE, P. (2008). Guía práctica de solución de diferencias en la OMC, documentos de proyecto No 221, Santiago, CEPAL.
HUDEC, R. (2002). “The Adequacy of WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies: A Developing Country Perspective”, en B. Hoekman, A. Mattoo, P. English Development, Trade and the WTO, Washington
D.C., World Bank.
JONES, J. (2005). e World Trade Organization Dispute Resolution Process: power politics or leveling the playing field?, Working Paper (ISA Conference), November 3-5.
LAWRENCE, R. (2007). The United States and the WTO Dispute Settlement System, New York, Council on Foreign Relations.
MARCEAU, G. (2002). “WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 4.
MOSOTI, V. (2006). “Africa in the First Decade of WTO Dispute Settlement”, J. Int. Economic Law. 9.
OMC. Informe Anual 2010, documento en internet: www.wto.org
PETERSMAN, E. (2004). “La proliferación y fragmentación de los mecanismos de solución de controversias en el comercio internacional: Los procedimientos de solución de diferencias en la OMC y los mecanismos de solución alternativa de controversias”, en Lacarte et al. (ed.), Solución de Controversias Comerciales Intergubernamentales, Washington, BID.
RAGOSTA, J. (2000). “Unmasking the Wto: Acces to Dsb System: Can the WTO DSB Live Up to the Moniker “World Trade Court”?, ”Law and policy in international business, 31.
SÁEZ, S. (2006). Las controversias en el marco de la Organización Mundial de Comercio: de dónde vienen, en dónde están, a dónde van?, Serie Comercio Internacional, No. 93, Santiago, CEPAL.
SALLES, J. (2006). Una década de funcionamiento del Sistema de Solución de Diferencias de la OMC: avances y desafíos, Santiago, CEPAL. SHAFFER, G. et al. (2008). “The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil’s Success”,Cornell Int. L. J., 41, Summer.
SHAFER, G. (2003). How to make the WTO Dispute Settlement System Work for developing Countries: Some proactive Developing Country Strategies, ICTSD Resource Paper No. 5.
SOREL, M. (2004). Resolución de Litigios en la OMC, Buenos Aires, Editorial Ciudad Argentina.
TROGOLO, C. (2007). El sistema de solución de diferencias de la Organización Mundial del Comercio. Obstáculos a la participación efectiva de los países en desarrollo y evaluación de los proyectos de
reforma del sistema, Buenos Aires, tesis de maestría, Flacso.
VILLAMARÍN, J. (2004). El mecanismo de diferencias en el sistema GATT/OMC. La práctica latinoamericana y la internalización del modelo, Biblioteca digital andina, documento en internet: http://www.comunidadandina.org/bda/docs/CAN-INT-0020.pdf
WILCKENS, S. (2008). Should WTO Dispute Settlement Be Subsidized?, Paper presentado en el Otago Workshop in International Trade.
ZIMMERMAN, (2005). e Reform of the DSU, Londres, Cameron May.
House Hilton, Chicago, documento en internet: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59883_index. html Consultado el 05-26 de 2009.
ALSTON, P. (2002). “Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann”, The Jean Monnet Programme, Jean Monnet Working Paper 12/02, New York, New York University School of Law, 2002, documento en internet: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2002.
AMARAL, D. (2007). “Pacificação do comércio internacional? A participação dos países em desenvolvimento nos contenciosos da OMC”, Rev. Jur., Brasília, Vol. 8, No. 83, fev./mar.
BRANDSTETTER, P. (2003). The participation of NGOs in the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Documento en internet: http://intlaw.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/int_beziehungen/Internetpubl/Brandstetter.pdf
BOHL, K. (2009). “Problems of developing country access to WTO dispute settlement”, Chicago-Kent Journal of International & Comparative Law, 130.
BOWN et al. (2005). “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing developing Country Cases: Engaging the private sector”, Paper presentado en la conferencia WTO dispute settlement and developing countries: use, implications, strategies, reforms, efectuada en Wisconsin University, Madison, 20-21 mayo 2005.
CATBAGAN, A. (2009). “Rights of action for private non-state actors in the WTO Dispute Settlement System”, Denver Journal of International Policy, Vol. 37.
EWART, A. (2007). “Small developing state in the WTO: A procedural approach to special and differential treatment through reforms to dispute settlement” en Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce. Vol. 35, No. 27.
FRANCKE, M. (2008). “Chile’s Participation in the Dispute Settlement System: Impact on Capacity Building”, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Inaugural Conference, Paper available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1159942
FIGUEROA, M. (2004). “Dinámicas de la nueva dimensión globalizada del régimen comercial multilateral: reconocimiento de nuevos sectores y participación de partes no estatales en el sistema OMC”, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, documento en internet: www.reei.org/reei8/PerezFigueroa_reei8_.pdf
GRANE, P. (2008). Guía práctica de solución de diferencias en la OMC, documentos de proyecto No 221, Santiago, CEPAL.
HUDEC, R. (2002). “The Adequacy of WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies: A Developing Country Perspective”, en B. Hoekman, A. Mattoo, P. English Development, Trade and the WTO, Washington
D.C., World Bank.
JONES, J. (2005). e World Trade Organization Dispute Resolution Process: power politics or leveling the playing field?, Working Paper (ISA Conference), November 3-5.
LAWRENCE, R. (2007). The United States and the WTO Dispute Settlement System, New York, Council on Foreign Relations.
MARCEAU, G. (2002). “WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 4.
MOSOTI, V. (2006). “Africa in the First Decade of WTO Dispute Settlement”, J. Int. Economic Law. 9.
OMC. Informe Anual 2010, documento en internet: www.wto.org
PETERSMAN, E. (2004). “La proliferación y fragmentación de los mecanismos de solución de controversias en el comercio internacional: Los procedimientos de solución de diferencias en la OMC y los mecanismos de solución alternativa de controversias”, en Lacarte et al. (ed.), Solución de Controversias Comerciales Intergubernamentales, Washington, BID.
RAGOSTA, J. (2000). “Unmasking the Wto: Acces to Dsb System: Can the WTO DSB Live Up to the Moniker “World Trade Court”?, ”Law and policy in international business, 31.
SÁEZ, S. (2006). Las controversias en el marco de la Organización Mundial de Comercio: de dónde vienen, en dónde están, a dónde van?, Serie Comercio Internacional, No. 93, Santiago, CEPAL.
SALLES, J. (2006). Una década de funcionamiento del Sistema de Solución de Diferencias de la OMC: avances y desafíos, Santiago, CEPAL. SHAFFER, G. et al. (2008). “The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil’s Success”,Cornell Int. L. J., 41, Summer.
SHAFER, G. (2003). How to make the WTO Dispute Settlement System Work for developing Countries: Some proactive Developing Country Strategies, ICTSD Resource Paper No. 5.
SOREL, M. (2004). Resolución de Litigios en la OMC, Buenos Aires, Editorial Ciudad Argentina.
TROGOLO, C. (2007). El sistema de solución de diferencias de la Organización Mundial del Comercio. Obstáculos a la participación efectiva de los países en desarrollo y evaluación de los proyectos de
reforma del sistema, Buenos Aires, tesis de maestría, Flacso.
VILLAMARÍN, J. (2004). El mecanismo de diferencias en el sistema GATT/OMC. La práctica latinoamericana y la internalización del modelo, Biblioteca digital andina, documento en internet: http://www.comunidadandina.org/bda/docs/CAN-INT-0020.pdf
WILCKENS, S. (2008). Should WTO Dispute Settlement Be Subsidized?, Paper presentado en el Otago Workshop in International Trade.
ZIMMERMAN, (2005). e Reform of the DSU, Londres, Cameron May.
