The effects of prenatal deaths on national life expectancy: case study U.S.A.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2665-427X/ijeph.2.10669Keywords:
health policy, life expectancy, life years, DALYAbstract
Introduction: It is a positive indicator that human life
expectancies calculated from birth have been increasing. The current standards for counting life-years, however, assume social desirability and exclude all prenatal deaths. These assumptions mask low life-year deaths and obscure results of medical and environmental interventions, thus falsely indicating higher life expectancies.
Aim: To quantify the life expectancy with and without
social desirability.
Methods: This case study investigates 1930 to 2016 using CDC and World Bank data for the U.S. for the impact of social desirability on life expectancy.
Results: It is evident, published U.S. life expectancies are greatly exaggerated and what would have been
short-lived Americans are disproportionately labeled as socially-undesirable and ignored when counting life years, thus presenting an overly-optimistic view of U.S. health.
Conclusions: A comprehensive global investigation is
needed, and a refinement of life expectancy calculations
should be introduced, which does not bias results by only counting life expectancy from the time of live birth.
Downloads
References
1. Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Carter A, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016; 388(10053): 1459-544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1
2. Roser M, Ortiz-Ospina E, Ritchie H. Life Expectancy. Our World in Data. 2020. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy
3. Arias E. National Vital Statistics Reports. US Department Of Health And Human Services. 2015; 64(11): 63.
4. CDC. CDCs Abortion Surveillance System FAQs. CDC ; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/abortion.htm
5. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. 1997;349(9063):1436-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8
6. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. 1997;349(9061):1269-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07493-4
7. CDC. Data Access - Vital Statistics Online. CDC; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm
8. World Bank. Life expectancy at birth, female (years) - United States, Low income Data. Worl Bank; 2020. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.FE.IN?locations=US-XM
9. CDC. MMWR Surveillance Summaries: Past Volume (1983-2019). MMWR. 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr_ss/ss_pvol.html
10. Guttmacher. Guttmacher Data Center. Guttmacher; 2020. Available from: https://data.guttmacher.org/states/trend?state=US&topics=66&dataset=data
11. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS.gov; 2020. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/
12. Curtin SC, Kost K. 2010 Pregnancy Rates Among U.S. Women. CDC National Center for Health Statistics e-stat; 2015. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/pregnancy/2010_pregnancy_rates.pdf
13. Jones RK, Jerman J. Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008-2014. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1904-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042
14. CDC. Data Access - Public-Use Data Files and Documentation; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/ftp_data.htm
15. Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, Lin S, Scuderi B, Turner N, et al. The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. JAMA. 2016;315(16):1750-66. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.4226
16. United States Census Bureau. Census - Table Results. 2020. Available from: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=S1301&g=&lastDisplayedRow=27&table=S1301&tid=ACSST1Y2018.S1301
17. Guttmacher. Abortion Reporting Requirements. Guttmacher Institute. 2016. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-reporting-requirements
18. Lang K, Nuevo-Chiquero A. Trends in Self-reported Spontaneous Abortions: 1970-2000. Demography. 2012;49(3):989-1009. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0113-0
19. The National Survey of Family Growth. Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/c.htm
20. Committe on Population. Contraceptive Benefits and Risks (Internet). Contraception and Reproduction: Health Consequences for Women and Children in the Developing World. National Research Council (US) Committee on Population. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1989. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235069/
21. Rossing MA, Daling JR, Weiss NS, Voigt LF, Stergachis AS, Wang SP, et al. Past use of an intrauterine device and risk of tubal pregnancy. Epidemiology. 1993; 4(3): 245-51. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199305000-00008
22. García-Enguídanos A, Martínez D, Calle ME, Luna S, Bernabé JV de, Domínguez-Rojas V. Long-term use of oral contraceptives increases the risk of miscarriage. Fertility Sterility. 2005; 83(6): 1864-6. doi : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.085
23. Sun Y, Che Y, Gao E, Olsen J, Zhou W. Induced abortion and risk of subsequent miscarriage. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003; 32(3):449-54. doi : 10.1093/ije/dyg093
24. Conforti A, Mascia M, Cioffi G, De Angelis C, Coppola G, De Rosa P, et al. Air pollution and female fertility: a systematic review of literature. Reproduct Biol Endocrinol. 2018; 16(1): 117. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0433-z
25. Pathak R, Mustafa MD, Ahmed RS, Tripathi AK, Guleria K, Banerjee BD. Association between recurrent miscarriages and organochlorine pesticide levels. Clin Biochem. 2010;43(1-2):131-5. doi : 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.09.019
26. Herndon J, Strauss LT, Whitehead S, Parker WY, Bartlett L, Zane S. Abortion Surveillance-United States, 1998. 1998. Cited 2020 May 19. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5103a1.htm
27. National Center for Health Statistics. Health in the United States. Government Printing Office; 1982. 536 p.
28. Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. Disparities in Abortion Rates: A Public Health Approach. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(10):1772-9.doi : 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301339
29. Klucznik S, Slepian H. Iceland’s Abortion Policy concerning Children with Down Syndrome: An Ethical Analysis. J Heal Ethics Admin. 2018; 4(1):45-8. doi:10.22461/jhea.10.7164
30. Quinones J, Lajka A. “What kind of society do you want to live in?”: Inside the country where Down syndrome is disappearing. CBS News; 2017. Available from: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/
31. Crimmins EM. Lifespan and healthspan: past, present, and promise. Gerontologist. 2015; 55(6): 901-11. doi : 10.1093/geront/gnv130
32. Cutler D, Miller G. The role of public health improvements in health advances: the twentieth-century United States. Demography. 2005; 42(1): 1-22. doi : 10.1353/dem.2005.0002
33. Jayachandran S, Lleras-Muney A, Smith KV. Modern medicine and the twentieth century decline in mortality: Evidence on the impact of sulfa drugs. Appl Economics. 2010; 2(2): 118-46. doi: 10.1257/app.2.2.118
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Interdisciplinary Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
