Diagnostic correlation of cervical cytolgy versus colposcopy in cervical cancer premalignant lesions. Ips universitaria, Barranquilla 2013
Keywords:
Cervical cytology, colposcopyAbstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic correlation of cervical cytolgy versus colposcopy in cervical cancer premalig- nant lesions. IPS Universitaria Barranquilla 2013. Materials and methods: Ambispective analytical validation of diagnostic test study a total of 50 patients in which the reporting cervical cytology, colposcopy and histopathology report was achieved, in addition to fulfilling the inclusion criteria, age 18 and full of variables to study in medical history data were included. Results: The mean age was 44,4 ± 9,0 years, the mean age of first intercourse was 17,6 ± 1,0 years; 8% had a family history of cervical cancer; cytology sensitivity 80% and specificity 56,6%; colposcopy showed sensitivity of 72,7% and specificity of 71,4%. Conclusions: Colposcopy showed higher diagnostic correlation than cervical cytology in premalignant lesions of cer- vical cancer.
Downloads
References
2.Waxman AG. Guidelines for cervical cancer screening: history and scientific rationale. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 9: 64-39
3.Borrero M. Actualización en citología cervicova- ginal. XI Curso de Actualización en Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2003; 71: 421-433
4.Lazcano E. Recommendations for cervical cancer screening programs in developing countries. The need for equity and technological development. Salud Publica Mex. 2003; 2: 50-55
5.Odunsi KO, Ganesan TS. The roles of the human major histocompatibility complex and human papillomavirus infection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer.ClinOncol (R CollRa- diol). 1997; 18: 89-99.
6.GLobocan database. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. 2009.
7.Dirección Seccional de Salud de Atlántico. Registro poblacional de cáncer. 2011.
8.Agency for healthcare Policy and Research: Evidence Report/Technology Assesment, Number 5.Evaluation of Cervical Cytology. Maryland, AHCPR Publication No.99-E010, February. 1999.
9.Sankaranarayanan R. Accuracy of conventional cytology: results from a multicentre screening study in India. J Med Screen. 2004; 12: 124-130.
10.Hilgarth M, Menton M. The colposcopic screening. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 1: 65-69.
11.Carta G. Colposcopy, cytology and histology in the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 26: 60-69.
12.Ramírez F, Ramírez G, Wong J. Correlación citocol- pohistológica en lesiones intraepiteliales de cuello uterino. Rev.”Medicina. 2005;11 (1): 108-113.
13.Pajtler M. Diagnostic value of cytology and col- poscopy for squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions. Coll Antropol. 2003;1: 234-239
14.Mitchell MF. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 12: 626-631.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
-
Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios<. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
-
NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
-
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.
