Important Factors and Aspects about QoE Evaluation Relating to Video Streaming Service
Keywords:
QoC, QoE, QoS, Video Streaming, MD5Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of how the finaldevice and interruptions affect the assessment ofQuality of Experience (QoE) when a user makesuse of streaming video service which was achievedby surveying 60 students who watched a video individuallyfor 1.53 minutes at one of the two devicesiPad1 iPhone4 twice, leaving the first one preloadthe data buffer 15 seconds and the second leavinghim totally preload, and based on the results wasobserved that the user qualifies the devices basedon the expectation , the interruptions have differenteffects depending of QoE evaluation device.To continue this work finally recommends checkingvariables such as screen size and resolutionin order to determine how the user perceive theservice depending on the change of these variables
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Herrera Pérez, Enrique, Introduccion a las telecomunicacionesmodernas, 1 vol, México, D,F. 2004.
2. Figueiras, Aníbal R, Una panoramica de las telecomunicaciones,Madrid, 2002.
3. Jimenez Rodriguez, Erick, Nunome Toshiro,y Tasaka Shuji, “Assessment of User Behaviorand QoE in Multi View Video And Audio IpTransmission”, 15th Asia-Pacific Conferenceon Communications, APCC 2009-188.
4. HuoI, Yusong, SuI Yujie, WangI Zhenhua, WuIJun, y Yan Ma, “Measurement Based Modelingand Assessment of Qoe Index in P2p Iptv Services”,IC-BN MET 2010.
5. Piamrat, Kandaraj, Viho Cesar, Ksentini Adlen,y Bonnin Jean Marie, “Quality of ExperienceMeasurements For Video Streaming OverWireless Networks”, 2009 Sixth InternationalConference on Information Technology.
6. DeMoor, Katrien, Wout Joseph, Istv´anKetyk´o, Emmeric Tanghe, Tom Deryckere,Luc Martens, y Lieven De Marez, “LinkingUsers’ Subjective QoE Evaluation to SignalStrength in an IEEE 802.11b/G Wireless LANEnvironment”, EURASIP Journal on WirelessCommunications and Networking.
7. Tominaga, Toshiko, Takanori Hayashi, OkamotoJun, y Takahashi Akira, “PerformanceComparisons of Subjective Quality AssessmentMethods for Mobile Video”, NTTService Integration Laboratories, NTT Corporation.
8. Mok, Ricky K. P., Cha, Edmond W. W., yChang, Rocky K. C., “Measuring the Qualityof Experience of HTTP Video Streaming”,Department of Computing, The Hong KongPolytechnic University, Hunghom, Kowloon,Hong Kong.
9. K.-T. Chen, C.-Y. Huang, P. Huang, y C.-L. Lei,“Quantifying Skype User Satisfaction,” Proc.Of SIGCOMM’06, Pisa, Italy, September 11-15, 2006.
10. A.G. Davis, D. Bayart, y D.S. Hands, “HybridNo-Reference Video Quality Prediction,” Proc.of IEEE International Symposium on BroadbandMultimedia Systems and Broadcasting(BMSB), Bilbao, Spain, May 13-15, 2009.
11. Vimeo, LLC, 555 West 18th Street, New York,Vimeo [sitio en internet], disponible en: http://vimeo.com/. Acceso continúo mes de enero,febreo y marzo de 2012.
12. “Subjective video quality assessment methodsfor multimedia applications” RecommendationITU-T P.910 04/08.
13. “Mean Opinion Score (MOS) terminology”,Recommendation ITU-T P.800.1, 07/06.
14. “Reference guide to quality of experience assessmentmethodologies”, RecommendationITU-T G.1011, 06/10.
15. E.L. Law, V. Roto, M. Hassenzahl, A.P. Vermeeren,y J.Kort, “Understanding, Scoping and DefiningUser Experience: A Survey Approach”,Proceedings of the 27th international conferenceon Human factors in computing systems,Boston, MA, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 719-728.
16. Brooks, Peter, “User Measures of Quality ofExperience: Why Being Objetive and Quantitativeis Important”, Journals & MagazinesIEEE, 2010.17. Kuan-Ta, Chen, y Chi-Jui Chang, “Quadrant ofEuphoria: A Crowdsourcing Platform for QoEAssessment”, National Taiwan University.18. Kuan-Ta, Chen, Cheng Chun TU, y WeiChengXiao, “OneClick: A Framework for MeasuringNetwork Quality of Experience”, IEEE CommunicationsSociety.19. Spagni de Barletta, Beatriz, Estadistica BasicaProbabilidad, 3ª ed, Universidad Nacional delLitoral, Santa Fe, Argentina, 2005.
2. Figueiras, Aníbal R, Una panoramica de las telecomunicaciones,Madrid, 2002.
3. Jimenez Rodriguez, Erick, Nunome Toshiro,y Tasaka Shuji, “Assessment of User Behaviorand QoE in Multi View Video And Audio IpTransmission”, 15th Asia-Pacific Conferenceon Communications, APCC 2009-188.
4. HuoI, Yusong, SuI Yujie, WangI Zhenhua, WuIJun, y Yan Ma, “Measurement Based Modelingand Assessment of Qoe Index in P2p Iptv Services”,IC-BN MET 2010.
5. Piamrat, Kandaraj, Viho Cesar, Ksentini Adlen,y Bonnin Jean Marie, “Quality of ExperienceMeasurements For Video Streaming OverWireless Networks”, 2009 Sixth InternationalConference on Information Technology.
6. DeMoor, Katrien, Wout Joseph, Istv´anKetyk´o, Emmeric Tanghe, Tom Deryckere,Luc Martens, y Lieven De Marez, “LinkingUsers’ Subjective QoE Evaluation to SignalStrength in an IEEE 802.11b/G Wireless LANEnvironment”, EURASIP Journal on WirelessCommunications and Networking.
7. Tominaga, Toshiko, Takanori Hayashi, OkamotoJun, y Takahashi Akira, “PerformanceComparisons of Subjective Quality AssessmentMethods for Mobile Video”, NTTService Integration Laboratories, NTT Corporation.
8. Mok, Ricky K. P., Cha, Edmond W. W., yChang, Rocky K. C., “Measuring the Qualityof Experience of HTTP Video Streaming”,Department of Computing, The Hong KongPolytechnic University, Hunghom, Kowloon,Hong Kong.
9. K.-T. Chen, C.-Y. Huang, P. Huang, y C.-L. Lei,“Quantifying Skype User Satisfaction,” Proc.Of SIGCOMM’06, Pisa, Italy, September 11-15, 2006.
10. A.G. Davis, D. Bayart, y D.S. Hands, “HybridNo-Reference Video Quality Prediction,” Proc.of IEEE International Symposium on BroadbandMultimedia Systems and Broadcasting(BMSB), Bilbao, Spain, May 13-15, 2009.
11. Vimeo, LLC, 555 West 18th Street, New York,Vimeo [sitio en internet], disponible en: http://vimeo.com/. Acceso continúo mes de enero,febreo y marzo de 2012.
12. “Subjective video quality assessment methodsfor multimedia applications” RecommendationITU-T P.910 04/08.
13. “Mean Opinion Score (MOS) terminology”,Recommendation ITU-T P.800.1, 07/06.
14. “Reference guide to quality of experience assessmentmethodologies”, RecommendationITU-T G.1011, 06/10.
15. E.L. Law, V. Roto, M. Hassenzahl, A.P. Vermeeren,y J.Kort, “Understanding, Scoping and DefiningUser Experience: A Survey Approach”,Proceedings of the 27th international conferenceon Human factors in computing systems,Boston, MA, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 719-728.
16. Brooks, Peter, “User Measures of Quality ofExperience: Why Being Objetive and Quantitativeis Important”, Journals & MagazinesIEEE, 2010.17. Kuan-Ta, Chen, y Chi-Jui Chang, “Quadrant ofEuphoria: A Crowdsourcing Platform for QoEAssessment”, National Taiwan University.18. Kuan-Ta, Chen, Cheng Chun TU, y WeiChengXiao, “OneClick: A Framework for MeasuringNetwork Quality of Experience”, IEEE CommunicationsSociety.19. Spagni de Barletta, Beatriz, Estadistica BasicaProbabilidad, 3ª ed, Universidad Nacional delLitoral, Santa Fe, Argentina, 2005.
Downloads
Published
2012-12-01
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Parrado Leal, Y. A., & Martínez Ballesteros, L. G. (2012). Important Factors and Aspects about QoE Evaluation Relating to Video Streaming Service. Avances: Investigación En Ingeniería, 9(2), 80-86. https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/avances/article/view/2720
