Dimension of justice of restoration justice paradigm in the criminal system for sexual violence in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/0124-0102/a.36.7475Keywords:
Restoration Justice, Sexual Violence, Victim Protection, Victim AssistanceAbstract
The act of sexual violence is a crime that is classified as a violation of human rights (HAM). The increase in cases of sexual violence in the world, including in Indonesia, shows that this shows that the existing justice system is unable to guarantee justice for victims, and most importantly recovery for victims. For this reason, a justice restoration approach is needed as an alternative in law enforcement against sexual crimes. In practice, marriage is used as a way to approach justice restoration. This article uses a normative and juridical approach to discuss law enforcement on sexual crimes through a restoration justice approach. It can be concluded that law enforcement on sexual crimes must look at the criminological, victimological and ontological aspects, in order to be able to place the problem objectively. As a complaint offense, sexual crimes may not be passed on to the criminal process, if there is peace between the victim and the perpetrator, provided that there is an agreement between the victim, the perpetrator, the family and the community without coercion from various parties. The main thing in the justice restoration approach for sexual crimes is to provide protection and assistance to victims from various parties, so that victims can be separated from the trauma or psychological impact caused by sexual violence experienced by the victim or the impact received after the occurrence of the sexual crime.
Downloads
References
Achie Sudiarti Luhulima, S.H., M. . (2000). Pemahaman Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan Dan Alternatif Pemecahannya. Universitas Indonesia.
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1362
Atmasasmita, R. (1995). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi. Mandar Maju.
Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Bunga Rampai Kriminologi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Barnett, R. E. (1977). Restitution: A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice. Ethics, 87(4), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1086/292043
Bazemore, Gordon, C. M. (2002). Restorative Justice and the Future of Diversion and Informal Social (in Restora). Willan Publishing.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice & Restorative Regulation. Oxford University Press Inc.
Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783
Eglash, A. (1977). ’Beyond Restitution: Creative Restitution (J. Hudson). DC Heath and Company.
Faulkner, S. L. (2003). Good girl or flirt girl: Latinas’ definitions of sex and sexual relationships. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303025002003
Gosita, A. (2014). Masalah Korban Kejahatan. PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Hawari, D. (2011). Psikopatologi kejahatan seksual. FKUI.
IASC. (2005). Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings.
Khanif, A. (2019). Women, Islam, And Modern Family Construction In The Perspectives Of Legal Pluralism In Indonesia. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah.
Liebmann, M. (2007). Restorative justice: How it works. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Makarao, M Taufik, Bukamo, W., and Azri, S. (2013). Hukum perlindungan anak dan penghapusan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Rineka Cipta.
Mansur, Dikdik M. Arief, and E. G. (2007). Korban Kejahatan : Antara Norma Dan Realita. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Nikmah Rosidah. (2014). Budaya Hukum Hakim Anak Di Indonesia. Pustaka Magister.
Paul Mccold and Ted Wachtel. (2003). In Pursuit of Paradigm: A Theory of Restorative Justice. XIII World Congress of Criminology.
Probosiwi, R., & Bahransyaf, D. (2015). Pedofilia Dan Kekerasan Seksual: Masalah Dan Perlindungan Terhadap Anak [Pedophilia and Sexual Violence: Problems and Child Protectioon]. Sosio Informa.
Sahetapy, J. E. (1983). Kejahatan Kekerasan Suatu Pendekatan Interdisipliner. Sinar Wijaya.
Sarong, A. H. (2019). The Child Rights In Islamic Law With A Special Focus On Aceh. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v4i1.10
Sianturi, K. A. (2016). Perwujudan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Melalui DiversI. De Lega Lata, 1(1).
Siregar, H. (2018). Peranan pusat kajian perlindungan anak dalam menjalankan hak asasi anak jalanan ditinjau dari pasal 11 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v15i1.17709
Soesilo, R. (1986). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar- Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Politeia.
Sullivan, D. and L. T. (2006). Handbook of Restorative Justice a Global Perspektif. Routledge.
Surbakti, N. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Perkembangan Pemikiran Dan Relevansinya Dengan Reformasi Hukum Indonesia. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Susila, J. (2019). Monodualistik Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v4i2.1795
Weda, M. D. (1996). Kriminologi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yantzi, M. (1998). Sexual offending and restoration. Herald Press.
Zainudin Ali. (2010). Sosiologi Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Zulfa, E. A. (2009). Keadilan Restoratif di Indonesia (Studi Tentang Kemungkinan Penerapan Pendekatan Keadilan Restorative dalam Praktek Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Universitas Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Advocatus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
