Strategies to achieve collaborative and innovative environments aimed at promoting agroindustrial markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2215-8944/academia.26.10806Keywords:
Ecosystems, agroindustrial innovation, territorial competitiveness, community rural strategyAbstract
The agricultural sector is one of the potential pillars of the Colombian economy that is strengthened from the interest of the public and private sectors for the development of actions aimed at transforming the countryside, increasing the well-being of peasant families and their family nucleus, dedicated to their majority to the production and transformation of products in the region. However, there are pronounced gaps that do not allow the progress of innovation ecosystems towards the promotion of agro-industry. The objective of this article is to analyze the type of strategies that must be deployed to achieve collaborative and innovative environments aimed at promoting agro-industrial markets that contribute to territorial competitiveness. For this, a qualitative, descriptive investigation was carried out directed at 40 small producers and 21 peasant associations in charge of guiding productive units located in the municipality of Timbio in the department of Cauca, Colombia, an eminently agricultural region. As a data collection technique, a semi-structured questionnaire was used, as well as the realization of four peasant markets and an agro-business fair, allowing the use of observation and diagnostic tools for research, data also processed by the Atlas.ti software. The results expose the contributions for the development of innovation ecosystems from four operating guidelines: a) The formulation of a competitive strategy, b) the promotion of fair trade and c) the promotion of networking, useful indications for public entities and private companies in charge of carrying out support processes for the sector, as well as for agricultural associations that lead the strengthening of the peasant community, becoming a benchmark for the strategic direction of the rural business fabric, being extrapolated to other sectors with similar characteristics.
Downloads
References
Butzin, A., & Terstriep, J. (2018). Actors engaged in Social Innovation Initiatives. In Atlas of Social Innovation. New Practices for a Better Future. Recuperado de https://www.socialinnovationatlas.net/fileadmin/PDF/einzeln/01_SI-Landscape_Global_Trends/01_17_Actor-and-Roles-in-SI_Butzin-Terstriep.pdf
Byvshev, V. I., Parfent‘eva, K. V., Uskov, D. I., & Panteleeva, I. A. (2021). Regional Institutions to Support Science and Innovation: Mechanisms to Improve the Efficiency of Their Operation. Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences, 15(4), 559-579. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0706
Castaneda, A. (2022). Ecosistema de innovación agroindustrial aplicado a la nanotecnología. Realidad y Reflexión, 1(55), 103-125. https://doi.org/10.5377/RYR.V1I55.14426
CEPAL. (2021). Séptima Conferencia Ministerial sobre la Sociedad de la Información de América Latina y el Caribe. Recuperado de https://www.cepal.org/apps
Connolly, A. J., Turner, J., & Potocki, A. D. (2018). IGNITE your corporate innovation: insights from setting up an ag-tech start-up accelerator. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 21(6), 833-846. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2017.0089
Coscione, M. (2019). Los beneficios y retos del comercio justo Los casos de Cosurca (Colombia) y Banelino (República Dominicana). Recuperado de https://clac-comerciojusto.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/cepal_clac2019_es.pdf
Dini, M., & Stumpo, G. (2020). Mipymes en América Latina: un frágil desempeño y nuevos desafíos para las políticas de fomento. Recuperado de https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/46153-mipymes-america-latina-un-fragil-desempeno-nuevos-desafios-las-politicas-fomento
FAO. (2020). Pobreza Rural. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/social-protection/es/
Gaudin, Y., & Padilla, R. (2020). Los intermediarios en cadenas de valor agropecuarias: un análisis de la apropiación y generación de valor agregado. Serie Comercio Internacional No. 44, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Retrieved from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45796/S2000468_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Gobernación del Cauca. (2015). Línea base de indicadores socioeconómicos Municipio de Timbío. Retrieved from http://anterior.cauca.gov.co/sites/default/files/informes/final_timbio_0.pdf
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2019). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Kellezi, J. (2014). Trade Shows: A Strategic Marketing Tool for Global Competition. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9, 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00048-3
López, M. (2019). Implementación y articulación del STEAM como proyecto institucional. American Journal of Science Education, 6, 12034. http://www.lajse.org/may19/2019_12034.pdf
Padilla, R. (2017). Política industrial rural y fortalecimiento de cadenas de valor. Libros de la CEPAL - Desarrollo Económico, 145, 234. Retrieved from https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/41850
Reischauer, G., Güttel, W. H., & Schüssler, E. (2021). Aligning the design of intermediary organisations with the ecosystem. Industry and Innovation, 28(5), 594-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1879737
Silveira, G., Farina, C., & Dos Santos, I. (2022). High-technology based startup in agribusiness sector: mapping linkages, products and services. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 60(4), e246210. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.246210
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-12-13 (3)
- 2023-12-13 (2)
- 2023-10-13 (1)