Tromboprofilaxis en cirugía ginecológica laparoscópica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-7841/rcslibre.2016v11n1.1392Palabras clave:
Embolismo popular, Laparoscopia, Tromboprofilaxis, Trombosis venosa profundaResumen
Dentro de los eventos tromboembólicos considerados están: la trombosis venosa profunda y el embolismo pulmonar, principales complicaciones que se pueden presentar durante y después de una cirugía ginecológica, por vía abierta o laparoscópica. Existe incertidumbre sobre el riesgo atribuido de tromboembolismo venoso después de procedimientos laparoscópicos, siendo controvertida la recomendación de tromboprofilaxis en este campo. El American College of Chest Physicians y el American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologist sugieren la clasificación de riesgo en 4 categorías: bajo, medio, alto y muy alto de las pacientes programadas para cirugía ginecológica. El riesgo de evento tromboembólico va a depender del tipo de procedimiento, tiempo quirúrgico, edad y la presencia de otros factores de riesgo. Hasta tener mayor evidencia, las pacientes llevadas a cirugía laparoscópica deberán ser estratificadas por categoría de riesgo y proveer profilaxis similar a pacientes llevadas a laparotomía. En mujeres de alto riesgo (mayores de 60 años, historia de trombosis venosa profunda, embolismo pulmonar o cáncer) se pueden beneficiar de la profilaxis dual y de prolongar su profilaxis hasta por 28 días.
Descargas
Referencias
2. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CH, Lassen MR, et al. Prevention of venous throm- boembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008; 133 (6 suppl): 381S-453S. URL disponible en: http://journal.publications.chestnet. org/article.aspx?articleid=1085923 DOI:10.1378/ chest.08-0656
3. Suzuki N, Yoshioka N, Ohara T, Yokomichi N, Nako T, Yahagi N, et al. Risk factors for perioperative ve- nous thromboembolism: A retrospective study in Japanese women with gynecologic diseases. Thromb J. 2010; 8: 17. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21054901 DOI: 10.1186/1477- 9560-8-17
4. Nick AM, Schmeler KM, Frumovitz MM, Soliman PT, Spannuth WA, Burzawa JK, et al. Risk of throm- boembolic disease in patients undergoing laparos- copic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2010116 (4): 956-61. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20859161 DOI: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013e3181f240f7
5. Solomon ER, Frick AC, Paraiso MF, Barber MD. Risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embo- lism in urogynecologic surgical patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203 (5): 510.e1-4. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20800214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.021
6. Peedicayil A, Weaver A, Li X, Carey E, Cliby W, Mariani A. Incidence and timing of venous throm- boembolism after surgery for gynecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121 (1): 64-9. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21183211 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.038
7. Zhang L, Liu X, Xue Y. Analysis of deep venous thrombosis after gynecological surgery: A clinical study of 498 cases. Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31 (2): 453-6. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/26101510 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.312.6608
8. Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a communitybased study in Western France. EPI-GET- BP Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost. 2000; 83 (5): 657-60. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10823257
9. Hussain YR, Tsai J, Atrash HK, Boulet S,Grosse SC. Venous thromboembolism in adult hospitalizations- United States, 2007-2009. MMWR. 2012; 61 (22): 401-4. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/ mmwrhtml/mm6122a1.htm
10. Cushman M, Tsai AW, White RH, Heckbert SR, Ro- samond WD, Enright P, et al. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: The longi- tudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Am J Med. 2004; 117 (1): 19-25. URL disponible en: https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/deep- vein-thrombosis-and-pulmonary-embolism-in-two- cohorts-the-lo DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.018
11. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, et al. A popula- tion-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pul- monary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151 (5): 933-8. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2025141
12. Qu H, Li Z, Zhai Z, Liu C, Wang S, Guo S, et al. Predicting of venous thromboembolism for patients undergoing gynecological surgery. Medicine (Bal- timore). 2015; 94 (39): e1653. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26426660 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001653
13. Caprini JA. Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon. 2005; 51 (2-3): 70-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15900257 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2005.02.003
14. Brennand JE, Greer IA. Thromboembolism in gy- naecological surgery. Curr Obst Gynaecol. 1998; 8 (1): 44-8. URL disponible en: https://www.resear- chgate.net/publication/223286768_Thromboem- bolism_in_gynaecological_surgery doi: 10.1016/ S0957–5847(98)80010–3.
15. Virchow R. Die Cellularpathologie in ihrer Be- grindung auf physiologische and pathologische Gewebslehre. Berlin;: 1858. URL disponible en: http://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/show/ virchow_cellularpathologie_1858
16. Goldman L, Schafer AI (eds.). Pulmonary embolism. In: Goldman’s Cecil Medicine. 24th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012; pp. 596-602.
18. Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO. eds. Pulmonary embolism. In: Braunwald’s heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 10th ed. Philadel- phia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. pp. 1664-81.
19. Pérez-Gómez F, Bover R. La nueva cascada de la coagulación y su posible influencia en el difícil equi- librio entre trombosis y hemorragia. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007; 60 (12): 1217-9. URL disponible: http://www. revespcardiol.org/es/la-nueva-cascada-coagula- cion-su/articulo/13113924/
20. Clark C, Cotton LT. Blood flow in deep veins of legs: recording technique and evaluation of methods to increase flow during operation. Br J Surg. 1968; 55: 211-4.
21. Elisha S, Heiner J, Nagelhout J, Gabot M. Venous thromboembolism: New concepts in perioperative management. AANA J. 2015; 83 (3): 211-21. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/26137764
22. Egan EL, Bowie EJ, Kazmier FJ, Gilchrist GS, Woods JW, Owen CA Jr. Effect of surgical operations on cer- tain tests used to diagnose intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1974; 49: 658-64. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/4413095
23. Piccioli A, Prandoni P, Ewenstein BM. Cancer and venous thromboembolism. Am Hear J. 1996; 132: 850-5.
24. Goad KE, Gralnick HR. Coagulation disorders in cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1996; 10 (2): 457-84. URL disponible: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/8707764
25. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al.. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27 (32): 5331-6. URL disponible en: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19805679 DOI: 10.1200/ JCO.2009.22.3248
26. Zhang H, Cui J, Jia L, Hong S, Kong B, Dadong L. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr. 2012; 116 (3): 185-91.
27. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Fayad C, Varela E, Konyalian V, Stamos MJ, et al. Laparoscopic sur- gery is associated with a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism compared with open surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 246 (6): 1021-7. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18043105 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815792d8
28. Feng L, Song J, Wong F, Xia E. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis after gynaecological laparos- copy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2001; 114 (6): 632-5. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/11780442
29. Clarke-Pearson DL, Synan IS, CreasmanWT. Signi- ficant venous thromboembolism caused by pelvic lymphocysts: diagnosis and management. Gynecol Oncol. 1982; 13 (1): 136-43. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7060988
30. Goldhaber SZ, Fanikos J. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol Obs Gynecol. 2007; 110: 429-40.
31. Clarke-Pearson DL, Dodge RK, Synan I MR, GL. M. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: patients at high risk to fail intermittent pneumatic com- pression. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101 (1):157-63. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/12517661
32. Ageno W, Manfredi E, Dentali F, Silingardi M, Ghez- zi F, Camporese G, et al. The incidence of venous thromboembolism following gynecologic laparosco- py: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5 (3): 503-6.
33. Healey MG, Maher PJ, Hill DJ, Meagher SE, Tregas- kis-Lye LE. The risk of venous thrombosis following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Med J Aust. 1998; 168 (10): 524. URL disponible en: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9631681
34. Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Lee AY, Ar- celus JI, Balaban EP, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31 (17): 2189-204. URL disponible en: http://ascopubs.org/ doi/full/10.1200/jco.2013.49.1118 DOI: 10.1200/ JCO.2013.49.1118
35. Clarke-Pearson DL, Synan IS, Colemen RE, Hinshaw W, Creasman WT. The natural history of postopera- tive venous thromboemboli in gynecologic oncology: a prospective study of 382 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 148 (8): 1051-4. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6711637
36. Kakkar VV, Howe CT, Flanc C, Clarke MB. Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lan- cet. 1969; 2 (7614): 230-2. URL disponible en: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4184105
37. Ramírez PT, Nick AM, Frumovitz M, Schmeler KM. Venous thromboembolic events in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gy- necol. 2013; 20 (6): 766-9. URL disponible en: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23850360 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.06.001
38. Hansen CT, Kehlet H, Moller C, Morch L, Utzon J, Ottesen B. Timing of heparin prophylaxis and blee- ding complications in hysterectomy: a nationwide prospective cohort study of 9,949 Danish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87 (10): 1039-47. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub- med/18792841 DOI: 10.1080/00016340802419384
39. Raskob GE, Hirsh J. Controversies in timing of the first dose of anticoagulant prophylaxis against ve- nous thromboembolism after major orthopedic sur- gery. Chest. 2003; 124 (6): 379S-85S. URL disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0012369215317402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/ chest.124.6_suppl.379S
40. Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L, Scarpa RM, Tonelli F, Bonizzoni E, et al. A clinical outcome-based pros- pective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery. The @RISTOS Project. Ann Surg. 2006; 243 (1): 89-95.
41. Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Pettterson TM, O ́Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159 (5): 445-53.
42. Bergqvist D, Agnelli G, Cohen AT, Eldor A, Nils- son PE, Moigne-Amrani AL, et al. Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346 (13): 975-80. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11919306 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012385
43. Rasmussen MS, Jorgensen LN, Wille-Jørgensen P, Nielsen JD, Horn A, Mohn AC, et al. Prolonged prophylaxis with dalteparin to prevent late throm- boembolic complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a multicenter randomized open-label study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4 (11): 2384-90. URL disponibe en: https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/16881934 DOI: 10.1111/j.1538- 7836.2006.02153.x
44. Rasmussen MS, Jorgensen LN W-JP. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 21 (1): CD004318. URL dis- ponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub- med/19160234 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004318. pub2
45. Del Priore G, Hamed AH. Incidence of venous throm- boembolism after minimally invasive surgery in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121 (4): 876-7. URL disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23635694 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828a70b1
46. Gien LT, Kupets R, Covens A. Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121 (2): 339-43. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub- med/21292313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.344
47. Wille-Jorgensen P, Rasmussen MS, Andersen BR, Borly L. Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Co- chrane DatabaseSyst Rev. 2003; 4. CD001217. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub- med/14583929 DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD001217.
48. Kakkos SK, Caprini JA, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides AN, Stansby GP, Reddy DJ. Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboem- bolism in high-risk patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 4: CD005258. URL disponible en: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18843686 DOI: 101002/1451858CD005258
49. Dainty L, Maxwell GL, Clarke-Pearson DL. Myers ER. Cost-effectiveness of combination throm- boembolism prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 93 (2): 366-73. URL disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub- med/15099947 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.004