Sensitivity and specifity of endosonography in diagnosis of pancreatic head cancer. Clinica general del norte, period 2013-2014
Keywords:
Sensitivity, Specificity, EndosonographyAbstract
Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of endosonography in diagnosis of pancreatic head cancer in patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer served in the Clinica General del Norte, January 2013-December 2014. Materials and methods: Evaluation study using a screening test, Endosonographic a total of 457 procedures were performed; the sample is for convenience in patients endosonography was indicated by clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer and met the inclusion criteria for a total of 46 patients. Results: Females showed the highest prevalence in the studied sample with 54.3 %, mean age 63.5 ± 3.0 years, 40 cases suggestive of malignancy in endosonography, was correlated with histopathological at 37, and 6 cases of benign pathology findings suggestive of correlated in 1 case. Conclusions: Endosonographic the imaging findings in the diagnosis of pancreatic head cancer, shows a sensitivity of 97.3 %, with a specificity of 62.5 %, based on the pathological-histological report pancreatic tissue (gold standard).
Downloads
References
2. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1605-17.
3. Argüello P. Cáncer de páncreas. Revisión de Tema. Asociaciones Colombianas de Gastroenterología, Endoscopia digestiva, Coloproctología y Hepatología. 2006; (3): 190-5.
4. Informe Epidemiológico Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Rev Col de Cancerología 2004; 8: 5-13.
5. Ozaki H, Kinoshita T, Kosuge T, et al. Effectiveness of multimodality treatment for respectable pancreatic cancer. Int J Pancreatol. 1990; 7 (1-3):195-200.
6. Moreno J, Sánchez A, García J, Ramírez G. Avances en cáncer de páncreas, del laboratorio a la clínica. UCLM; 2013.
7. Reddy S, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, et al. Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation of morbidity and longterm survival. Ann Surg 2009; 250(2):282-7.
8. Micames C, Jowell PS, White R, Paulson E, Nelson R, Morse M, et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs percuteneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58:690-5.
9. Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B, Baraza AJ, Palazzo L, Dumontier I, et al. Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170:1315-22.
10. Ahmad NA, Lewis JD, Ginsberg GG, Rosato EF, Morris JB, Kochman ML. EUS in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Oct; 52(4):463-8.
11. Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB, Bueno de Mesquita HB, et al. Past medical history and pancreatic cancer risk: results from a multicenter case-control study. Ann Epidemiol 2010; 20(2):92-8.
12. AGA technical review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 1464-84.
13. Erturk SM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Herrmann KA, Marti-Bonmati L, Ros PR. Use of 3.0-TMR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen.
14. Fernández-Esparrach G, Gines A, Pellisé M, et al. Papel de la ultrasonografía endoscópica en el estudio de las colestasis extrahepáticas. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 25: 633-8.
15. Kida M. Pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: S102-9.
16. Chang KJ. Imaging is overrated: early and frequent use of FNA in pancreatic tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: S157-8.
17. Michaud DS, Giovannucci E, Willet WC, et al. Physical activity, obesity, height, and the risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA 2001; 286: 921-9.
18. Lodice S, Gandini S, Maisonneuve P, et al. Tobacco and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008; 393(4): 535-45.
19. Mössner J. What is the epidemiologic impact of pancreatic cancer? Clinical Pancreatology for Practising Gastroenterologists and Surgeons. 2011; (41):331-50.
20. Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB, Bueno de Mesquita HB, et al. Past medical history and pancreatic cancer risk: results from a multicenter case-control study. Ann Epidemiol 2010; 20(2):92-8.
21. Alguacil J, Kauppinen T, Porta M, et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer and occupational exposures in Spain. PANKRAS II Study Group. Ann Occup Hyg 2000; 44(5): 391-403.
22. Palazzo L. Ecoendoscopia del páncreas. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 25: 26-34
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
-
Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios<. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
-
NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
-
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, deberá difundir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.
