An alternative of legitimacy for the solution by channels of negotiation to the Colombian interna! armed conflict under international criminal law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18041/2215-8944/academia.8.2487Keywords:
Referral of situation, negotiated justice, intemal armed conflict, intemational criminal law, Intemational Criminal CourtAbstract
In a context of internal armed conflict as the Colombian one, is necessary achieve the maintenance of the rule of law through institutional legal mechanisms that are legitimates; between this frame is included the lnternational Criminal Court as an international organization responsible of taking to justice the mainly responsible of high transcendence crimes. Thus, via this paper is developed a proposal of solution to this conjuncture through the acceptance of the Intemational Criminal Court' s jurisdiction, so as it stops being considered an obsta de to pea ce and becomes a tool for it.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Amann, D. M. (2002). Group mentality, expressivism and genocide, International criminal law review, 2.2.
Ambos, K. (2009). The legal framework of transitional justice: A systematic study with special focus on the role of the ICC. Berlín: Springer-Verlag.
Ambos, K. (2010). El test de complementariedad de la Corte Penal Internacional (artículo 17 Estatuto de Roma). InDret. 2. Recuperado en: <http://www.indret.com/es/ index.php> [Consulta: 13.12.2013].
Benzig, M. (2003). The complementarity regime of the International Criminal Court: International criminal justice between state sovereignty and the fight against impunity. En VV.AA., Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. 7.
Cárdenas Aravena, C. (2011). Revisión crítica del criterio 'interés de la justicia' como razón para no abrir una investigación o no iniciar un enjuiciamiento ante la Corte Penal Internacional. Revista de derecho Universidad Católica del Norte. 18. l.
Cassese, A., Acquaviva, G., Fan, M. & Withing, A. (2011 ). International criminal law: Cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Centro Nacional De Memoria Histórica (2013). ¡Basta ya! Colombia: Memorias de guerra y dignidad, Bogotá D.C.: CNMH.
Cook, J. A. (2005). Plea bargaining at The Hague. The Yale Journal of International Law. 30. 473-506. Recuperado en <http://digitalcommons.law. uga.edu/ fac_artchop/858> [Consulta: 05.01.2014].
Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. & Wilmshurst, E. (2010). An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Damaska, M. (2004). Negotiated justice in international criminal courts. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2.
Deguzmán, M. (2011). Choosing to prosecute: Expressive selection at the Intemational Criminal Court. Temple University Legal Studies. 2011-16. Recuperado en: <http:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=l780446> [Consulta: 14.12.2013].
Deguzmán, M. & Schabas, W., Initiation of investigations and selection of Revista Academia & Derecho 5 (8) (137-152) Enero - Tunio 2014 cases. Recuperado en: <http://ssm. com/ abstract= 1999003> [ Consulta: 17.12.2013].
Hethe, T. (2005). The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, amnesties and the 'interests of justice': Striking a delicate balance. Washington University Global Studies Law Review. 4. 2.
International Criminal Procedure Expert Framework, General rules and principles of international criminal procedure and recommendations of the international expert framework. Recuperado en: <http://www.hiil. org/data/sitemanagement/media/ IEF Brochure_241011.pdf> [Consulta: 13.12.2013].
López Medina, D.E. (2004). Teoría impura del derecho. La transformación de la cultura jurídica latinoamericana. Bogotá D.C.: Editorial Legis.
Olásolo Alonso, H. (2003). Corte Penal Internacional ¿dónde investigar? Especial referencia a la Fiscalía en el proceso de activación. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Olásolo Alonso, H. (2011 ). Ensayos de derecho penal y procesal internacional. Bogotá D.C.: Biblioteca Jurídica Diké.
Petrig, A. (2008). Negotiated justice and the goals of intemational criminal tribunals. With a focus on the pleabargaining practice of the ICTY and the legal framework of the ICC. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law. 8. Recuperado en: <http://www.kentlaw. edu/jicl/ articles/spring2008/ Petrig_negotiated_justice_final. pdf> [Consulta: 06.01.2014].
Rauxloh, R. E. (2011). Plea bargaining: A necessary tool for the International Criminal Court Prosecutor. Judicature. 94. 4.
Schabas, W. (2004). An introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Scharf, M. P. (2006). From the eXile Files: An Essay on Trading Justice for Peace. Washington and Lee Law Review. 63. l.
Scharf, M.P. & Dowd, P. (2008). No way out? Toe question of unilateral withdrawals of referrals to the ICC and other human rights courts. Case Research Paper Series in Legal Studies. 08-21. Recuperado en <http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1240802> [Consulta: 11.12.2013].
Stahn, C., El Zeidy, M. & Olásolo Alonso, H. (2005). Developments at the Intemational Criminal Court: The Intemational Criminal Court' s ad hoc jurisdiction revisited. American Journal of International Law. 99.
Ambos, K. (2009). The legal framework of transitional justice: A systematic study with special focus on the role of the ICC. Berlín: Springer-Verlag.
Ambos, K. (2010). El test de complementariedad de la Corte Penal Internacional (artículo 17 Estatuto de Roma). InDret. 2. Recuperado en: <http://www.indret.com/es/ index.php> [Consulta: 13.12.2013].
Benzig, M. (2003). The complementarity regime of the International Criminal Court: International criminal justice between state sovereignty and the fight against impunity. En VV.AA., Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. 7.
Cárdenas Aravena, C. (2011). Revisión crítica del criterio 'interés de la justicia' como razón para no abrir una investigación o no iniciar un enjuiciamiento ante la Corte Penal Internacional. Revista de derecho Universidad Católica del Norte. 18. l.
Cassese, A., Acquaviva, G., Fan, M. & Withing, A. (2011 ). International criminal law: Cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Centro Nacional De Memoria Histórica (2013). ¡Basta ya! Colombia: Memorias de guerra y dignidad, Bogotá D.C.: CNMH.
Cook, J. A. (2005). Plea bargaining at The Hague. The Yale Journal of International Law. 30. 473-506. Recuperado en <http://digitalcommons.law. uga.edu/ fac_artchop/858> [Consulta: 05.01.2014].
Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. & Wilmshurst, E. (2010). An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Damaska, M. (2004). Negotiated justice in international criminal courts. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2.
Deguzmán, M. (2011). Choosing to prosecute: Expressive selection at the Intemational Criminal Court. Temple University Legal Studies. 2011-16. Recuperado en: <http:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=l780446> [Consulta: 14.12.2013].
Deguzmán, M. & Schabas, W., Initiation of investigations and selection of Revista Academia & Derecho 5 (8) (137-152) Enero - Tunio 2014 cases. Recuperado en: <http://ssm. com/ abstract= 1999003> [ Consulta: 17.12.2013].
Hethe, T. (2005). The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, amnesties and the 'interests of justice': Striking a delicate balance. Washington University Global Studies Law Review. 4. 2.
International Criminal Procedure Expert Framework, General rules and principles of international criminal procedure and recommendations of the international expert framework. Recuperado en: <http://www.hiil. org/data/sitemanagement/media/ IEF Brochure_241011.pdf> [Consulta: 13.12.2013].
López Medina, D.E. (2004). Teoría impura del derecho. La transformación de la cultura jurídica latinoamericana. Bogotá D.C.: Editorial Legis.
Olásolo Alonso, H. (2003). Corte Penal Internacional ¿dónde investigar? Especial referencia a la Fiscalía en el proceso de activación. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Olásolo Alonso, H. (2011 ). Ensayos de derecho penal y procesal internacional. Bogotá D.C.: Biblioteca Jurídica Diké.
Petrig, A. (2008). Negotiated justice and the goals of intemational criminal tribunals. With a focus on the pleabargaining practice of the ICTY and the legal framework of the ICC. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law. 8. Recuperado en: <http://www.kentlaw. edu/jicl/ articles/spring2008/ Petrig_negotiated_justice_final. pdf> [Consulta: 06.01.2014].
Rauxloh, R. E. (2011). Plea bargaining: A necessary tool for the International Criminal Court Prosecutor. Judicature. 94. 4.
Schabas, W. (2004). An introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Scharf, M. P. (2006). From the eXile Files: An Essay on Trading Justice for Peace. Washington and Lee Law Review. 63. l.
Scharf, M.P. & Dowd, P. (2008). No way out? Toe question of unilateral withdrawals of referrals to the ICC and other human rights courts. Case Research Paper Series in Legal Studies. 08-21. Recuperado en <http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1240802> [Consulta: 11.12.2013].
Stahn, C., El Zeidy, M. & Olásolo Alonso, H. (2005). Developments at the Intemational Criminal Court: The Intemational Criminal Court' s ad hoc jurisdiction revisited. American Journal of International Law. 99.
Downloads
Published
2014-06-01
Issue
Section
Artículos
How to Cite
An alternative of legitimacy for the solution by channels of negotiation to the Colombian interna! armed conflict under international criminal law. (2014). Academia & Derecho, 8, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.18041/2215-8944/academia.8.2487
