Algunas críticas al poder judicial constitucional
Keywords:
Constitutional court, legitimacy, paternalism, philosophy of law, constitutional lawAbstract
The objective of this article is to present some criticisms or objections to the constitutional judiciary, based on the various legal philosophical discussions that have arisen since the late 20th and early 21st centuries. These are quite complex and extensive. The research methodology is critical-analytic. We will present the criticisms currently underway, since while we are attempting to write this scientific literary sketch, many more criticisms are being developed by various authors. However, those that will be presented have been considered relevant. We will therefore find that the constitutional judiciary must be more democratic in order to have greater legitimacy.
Downloads
References
Aleinikoff, A. (1987). Constitutional law in the age of balancing. Michigan: The yale law school.
Alemany, M. (2005). El concepto y la justificacion del paternalismo. DOXA, 265303.
Bernal, C. (2007). El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de estudios constitucionales.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Etica privada e igualitarismo politico. Barcelona: Paidos.
Forsthoff, E. (1975). El Estado de la sociedad industrial. Madrid: Instituto de estudios politicos.
Frantz, L. (1963). is the first amendment law- a reply to profesor mendelson. California: California law review.
Hart, H. (1963). Law, liberty and morality. Stanford: Stanford university press.
Laporta, F. (2001). El ambito de la constitucion. DOXA, 460-480.
Mejia, O. (2007). Elites, Eticidades y constitución. Cultura politica y poder constituyente en Colombia. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Nino, C. (2007). Etica y derechos humanos. Buenos aires : Astrea.
Schwartzberg, M. (2009). Was the graphe paranomon a form of judicial review? Dallas: Cardozo law review.
Sunstein, C. (1993). Legal interferences with private preferences. En J. De paramo, Tolerancia y liberalismo. Madrid: Centro de estudios constitucionales.
Tushnet, M. (2014). Revision judicial dialogica. En R. Gargarella, Por una justicia dialogica. el poder judicial como promotor de la deliberacion democratica (págs. 105116). Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editores.
Waldron, J. (2005). Derecho y desacuerdos. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Zimmerling, R. (2005). Influence and power. Kluwer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Cultural Unilibre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
